cs.CROct 13, 2026

ProtoArena: Can AI Agents Discover and Exploit Real-World Cross-Component Protocol Vulnerabilities?

Authors: Fasheng Miao, Zhaoyu Hu, Xiang Li, Changqing An, Jiutian Zeng, Longtao Huang, Haixin Duan, Jilong Wang

Organizations: Tsinghua University · Alibaba Group · Nankai University · Quancheng Lab

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used for vulnerability analysis, yet existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of exploitation that depends on interactions among network protocol components. Such vulnerabilities arise from inconsistencies in message interpretation, timing, state, or trust assumptions across participants. We introduce ProtoArena, a black-box, multi-component, dynamic benchmark with 80 cross-component vulnerability-exploitation environments spanning 11 protocol and application domains and 7 attack categories. Tasks are primarily informed by published protocol-attack mechanisms. Agents interact with running systems through scoped interfaces to achieve security-effect objectives without target source code. Three information levels assess guided reproduction, exploitation with mechanism and topology context, and effect-directed black-box exploration. A hybrid verifier combines rule-based checks with LLM review of independently collected traffic and logs. We evaluate five LLMs. Claude Opus 4.8 achieves the highest observed success rates: 48.8% under L1 guidance and 12.5% under effect-directed black-box L3. In a separate DNSBomb optimization experiment, it achieves a peak downstream-response to average query-input byte-rate ratio exceeding 171,000 times. The results show that agents can achieve verifiable exploitation effects in some cross-component environments, but success with limited black-box information remains low and varies across domains and attack categories. All experiments use controlled, explicitly authorized targets; they do not test production systems or disclose previously unknown vulnerabilities.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables1 asset

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. ZeroDayBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Unseen Zero-Day Vulnerabilities for Cyberdefense

    Mar 2, 2026Nancy Lau, Louis Sloot, Jyoutir Raj +6AI Agent Security BenchmarksLLMs for Cybersecurity

  2. Decoupling Reconnaissance and Exploitation: Measuring the Capability Boundaries of LLM-Based Web Penetration Testing

    Jun 24, 2026Liwei Yu, Shuo Li, Ming Zhou +2LLM Agent EvaluationAI Agent Security Benchmarks

  3. ExploitBench: A Capability Ladder Benchmark for LLM Cybersecurity Agents

    May 13, 2026Seunghyun Lee, David BrumleyAI Agent Security BenchmarksLLMs for Cybersecurity