Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on diverse vision-language tasks, but their computational demands limit deployment under constrained budgets, particularly on edge devices. Many works focus on Knowledge Distillation (KD) and try to transfer knowledge from powerful teacher models to students. In addition to reducing model size, visual token compression provides a complementary route to efficiency, but introduces mismatched visual token counts that complicate direct token-wise knowledge transfer. To mitigate this, we propose DVTR-KD, a knowledge distillation framework based on Dense Visual Token Reconstruction, which reconstructs the teacher's dense visual tokens from the student's compressed tokens. We reconstruct visual states after the final LLM layer and at the input to an intermediate layer identified as important for visual-information readout. At the intermediate layer, reconstruction is supervised through the teacher's response predictions rather than by direct token-wise KL or MSE matching. An auxiliary attention-readout loss complements this response-level supervision by aligning how the student and the original teacher integrate contextual information when predicting responses. Evaluations on diverse benchmarks demonstrate that DVTR-KD improves the performance of token-compressed students while retaining the inference efficiency afforded by visual token compression.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Layer-wise sensitivity to visual-value ablation after SFT and before distillation. We zero the value vectors of all visual tokens in one transformer layer at a time and report the change in response NLL ( ΔNLL ), averaged over the same diagnostic subset. In the legends, 1× denotes uncompressed models, while 4× and 16× denote models with nominal fourfold and sixteenfold reductions in visual-token count. The sample counts are summed over all training datasets before distillation.
Figure 2: Overview of DVTR-KD. (a) The intermediate reconstructor Rmid reconstructs student visual states in the teacher’s dense layout at PVRL, substituting teacher’s visual states; this reconstruction is supervised through response predictions produced by the teacher from the PVRL onward. Native response distillation and an independent final-layer reconstructor Rlast provide additional supervision. (b) Readout alignment uses attention outputs from the original teacher and the student. (c) An illustration to the reconstructor.
Model
Stage 1
Stage 1.5
SFT
KD
Student
LLaVA-PreTrain-558K
–
LLaVA-NeXT-779K
LLaVA-NeXT-779K
Same-data teacher
LLaVA-PreTrain-558K
–
LLaVA-NeXT-779K
Frozen
Data-rich teacher
LLaVA-PreTrain-558K
LLaVA-ReCap-558K
LLaVA-OneVision-SI-3.3M
Frozen
Table 1: Training data for model preparation and knowledge distillation. “–” indicates a skipped stage; “Frozen” indicates that the teacher is used without parameter updates during KD.
General
Knowledge
OCR
Method
ρ2
GQA
MME
RWQA
SQA
AI2D
MMMU
MMStar
ChartQA
DocVQA
TextVQA
OCRBench
Avg11
Qwen3-0.6B teacher trained on 4.4M samples → Qwen3-0.6B compressed students
Teacher
1×
56.6
1862.9
61.7
88.2
73.6
37.0
50.2
78.8
87.5
77.3
74.3
68.3
SFT
4×
57.8
1450.2
53.6
59.8
59.9
32.1
38.3
64.6
67.7
63.1
49.8
54.4
MiniLLM
4×
58.3
1616.3
56.1
61.3
60.8
32.1
38.6
64.6
66.9
65.1
52.2
55.8
LLaVA-KD ∗
4×
59.7
1636.3
58.0
62.6
64.9
32.3
40.5
70.6
74.4
68.0
56.3
58.7
Table 2: Distillation results across visual-token compression ratios, teacher data regimes and teacher scales. All methods are re-implemented for fair comparison and start from the corresponding SFT model. ρ2 denotes the nominal visual-token compression factor. LLaVA-KD ∗ means we use our reconstruction method to align different visual-token counts after last block. MME scores are divided by 28 when calculating the average scores. Avg11 is the mean over all 11 benchmarks.
Lresp
Lvis
LDVTR
Lreadout
Avg11
✓
–
–
–
51.0
✓
✓
–
–
51.2
✓
✓
✓
–
52.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
53.0
Table 3: Ablation study on contributions from key components in our method.
ρ2
type
Avg11
4×
MSE
60.2
4×
response
59.9
16×
MSE
51.9
16×
response
53.0
Table 4: Ablation study on supervision type for reconstruction at PVRL.
ℓ
AvgG
AvgK
AvgO
Avg11
1
55.5
49.7
51.6
52.0
11
56.6
50.8
51.6
52.7
13
55.9
50.5
52.3
52.6
12 ( ℓ∗ )
56.6
51.0
52.4
53.0
Table 5: Reconstruction at different layers. AvgG , AvgK , and AvgO denote the mean scores on the General, Knowledge, and OCR benchmarks, respectively.
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Hyperparameter
Stage-1
Stage-1.5
Stage-2
KD
Train ViT Backbone
–
–
–
–
Train Projector
✓
✓
✓
✓
Train Compressor
✓
–
✓
✓
Train LLM
–
✓
✓
✓
Train Reconstructor
–
–
–
✓
Projector LR
10−3
2×10−5
2×10−5
2×10−5
Appendix
Table 6: Training hyperparameters across different stages.
Benchmark
Split
Count
Metric
GQA
Test-dev balanced
12,578
Exact match
MME
Test
2,374
Acc. + Acc. +
RWQA
Test
765
Accuracy
SQA
Test (image subset)
2,017
Accuracy
AI2D
Test
3,088
Accuracy
MMMU
Validation
900
Accuracy
Appendix
Table 7: Evaluation splits and metrics. Counts denote evaluated questions.
Lresp
Lvis
Lrel
Avg11
✓
–
–
51.0
✓
✓
–
51.2
✓
✓
✓
50.6
Appendix
Table 8: Effect of relation distillation in our adapted LLaVA-KD baseline under ρ2=16 .
Figure 3: Layer-wise sensitivity to visual-value ablation after distillation. We compare DVTR-KD students with the data-rich teacher and the corresponding SFT students.
Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable multimodal understanding and reasoning capabilities, yet remain computationally expensive due to dense visual tokenization. Existing efficiency approaches either merge redundant visual tokens or drop them progressively in language backbone, often trading accuracy for speed. In this work, we propose DUET-VLM, a versatile plug-and-play dual compression framework that consists of (a) vision-only redundancy aware compression of vision encoder's output into information-preserving tokens, followed by (b) layer-wise, salient text-guided dropping of visual tokens within the language backbone to progressively prune less informative tokens. This coordinated token management enables aggressive compression while retaining critical semantics. On LLaVA-1.5-7B, our approach maintains over 99% of baseline accuracy with 67% fewer tokens, and still retains >97% even at 89% reduction. With this dual-stage compression during training, it achieves 99.7% accuracy at 67% and 97.6% at 89%, surpassing prior SoTA visual token reduction methods across multiple benchmarks. When integrated into Video-LLaVA-7B, it even surpasses the baseline -- achieving >100% accuracy with a substantial 53.1% token reduction and retaining 97.6% accuracy under an extreme 93.4% setting. These results highlight end-to-end training with DUET-VLM, enabling robust adaptation to reduced visual (image/video) input without sacrificing accuracy, producing compact yet semantically rich representations within the same computational budget. Our code is available at https://github.com/AMD-AGI/DUET-VLM.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) encode images into dense visual token sequences, creating substantial attention and KV-cache overhead. Existing visual token compression methods reduce this cost by pruning low-saliency tokens in shallow layers, but this practice couples temporary computational deactivation with irreversible information deletion. We show that this coupling breaks an intrinsic inference pattern in MLLMs. Through layer-wise attention analysis, we identify Visual Backtracking: visual pivots remain spatially stable, yet in middle layers they actively retrieve context from tokens that appeared unimportant earlier. Thus, early low-saliency tokens can be inactive for computation while still being useful for later reasoning. Motivated by this finding, we propose ReTrace, a backtracking-aware compression framework that introduces a dormant token state. ReTrace caches non-pivot tokens outside expensive layer-wise computation, restores them during the backtracking window, and prunes only after their information has been absorbed. Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL and InternVL3 demonstrate nearly 90% reductions in FLOPs and KV cache, a 2.83× prefilling speedup, and strong performance retention across complex vision-language benchmarks.
Guangzong Si, Dong Wang, Yifan Yu +3
University of Science and Technology of China · Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo · Tsinghua University +2
While knowledge distillation (KD) is widely adopted for training lightweight models by leveraging supervision from larger teacher models, relying solely on output token distributions has proven insufficient for compressing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Since output tokens are a byproduct of the model attending to visual inputs, prior works have explored explicitly distilling attention to provide a direct supervisory signal. While promising, the precise utility of which attention signals to distill remains under-explored. In this work, we challenge the conventional reliance on prompt-to-vision attention by revealing that downstream performance correlates strongly with response-to-vision attention similarity to the teacher, but negligibly with that of prompt-conditioned attention. Furthermore, we observe that attention distributions exhibit significant variance across individual tokens, indicating that a uniform distillation objective is suboptimal. To this end, we introduce Token-level Response-visual Attention Guidance (TRAG), a distillation objective that 1) shifts the focus to response-to-vision signals and 2) employs token-specific objectives by adaptively weighting the Kullback-Leibler divergence based on attention entropy, effectively guiding the student to mirror the teacher's precise visual focus. Extensive experimental results on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that TRAG significantly outperforms prior distillation baselines.
Jaehyun Jang, Eunseop Yoon, Hee Suk Yoon +3
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea · University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA