Lifting: Quantum State Discrimination Framework for Mid-Circuit Measurements

Circuit cutting lets a large quantum neural network (QNN) run as independent subcircuits on small devices, but rebuilding its outputs by reconstruction carries a classical sampling overhead exponential in the number of cuts - the dominant runtime cost in prior work. We ask whether, for machine-learning tasks, this step is necessary, and replace it with late fusion: each subcircuit is trained and measured independently, and a small classical head combines their outputs - a linear-cost, decision-level combination borrowed from multimodal learning. To characterize the trade-off we introduce a quantumness dial $Q$, a tunable reconstruction budget interpolating from pure fusion to full reconstruction, and a cut-entanglement diagnostic that indicates how much reconstruction a task needs (Spearman $ρ=0.59$ over $104$ runs). Across synthetic and standard datasets, independently trained late fusion matches full reconstruction accuracy within $0.04$ at every point of the controlled sweep and on every classical benchmark, at exponentially lower cost; it is also markedly more robust to shot and device noise. Controlled entangled-data experiments locate the boundary where fusion must fail. We do not claim advantage over classical machine learning - consistent with recent benchmarking, quantum offers no accuracy edge on these datasets. Late fusion is thus an efficient, noise-robust, self-characterizing alternative to reconstruction for circuit-cutting QML.

Fast and accurate qubit-state assignment is essential for feedback, calibration, and error correction in quantum processors. In superconducting platforms, frequency-multiplexed readout makes this task intrinsically multivariate as measured traces can encode crosstalk, qubit-state relaxation events, and other transient nonidealities that are not fully captured by conventional matched filtering. Here, we introduce spiking neural network (SNN) discriminators for superconducting qubit readout. By processing the measurement window in successive time chunks, the networks exploit temporal structure and update classification scores as data arrive, rather than waiting until the end of the readout window. The spiking networks outperform matched-filter discrimination and approach the accuracy of a full-trace artificial neural network. Beyond reaching the performance of artificial neural networks, the key advantage of SNNs is that they provide a streaming, time-resolved estimate of the qubit state that evolves as the readout signal is acquired. Using quantisation-aware training and hls4ml synthesis, we further demonstrate that each FPGA inference update can be completed before the next readout chunk arrives. These results establish spiking neural networks as a promising route to low-latency, real-time qubit readout on FPGA hardware, with broader implications for time-critical quantum-control and scientific-inference applications.

Supervised approaches to quantum error mitigation learn a map from noisy circuit outputs to ideal ones, and therefore require the ideal outputs. Producing those ideal outputs demands noiseless classical simulation, whose cost grows exponentially with system size, so supervision is unavailable in exactly the regime where mitigation matters most. We ask whether cheap, individually unreliable signals drawn from circuit structure and hardware calibration can take the place of ideal labels. We assemble sixteen heuristic labeling functions (stabilizer and parity constraints, relaxation and readout characteristics, local depth, gate counts, and neighboring activity), reconcile their disagreements with a probabilistic label model, and read the resulting per-qubit error probabilities as a readout channel whose inverse mitigates the measured distribution. No ideal output enters the training path. On $147{,}000$ five-qubit circuits executed on two IBM devices, the method removes $24.3\%$ (Algiers) and $28.8\%$ (Hanoi) of the Kullback-Leibler divergence to the ideal distribution, against $15.4\%$ and $21.5\%$ for the strongest published analytical baseline, a margin that holds on both devices and lies far outside its bootstrap interval. Supervised neural models trained on ideal distributions remain stronger where such labels exist, and we quantify that gap rather than setting it aside; the method's claim is to the regime where they do not, since the labels they require cannot be computed for the circuits mitigation is needed for. The codes will be released shortly.