cs.LGOct 14, 2026

On Global Joint Lower Bounds in Zeroth-Order Nonconvex Optimization

Authors: Yuxuan Xia, Xiao-Tong Yuan

Abstract

Recent work has sought to transfer first-order nonconvex optimization guarantees to zeroth-order methods through gradient estimators, typically incurring a factor linear in dd. \citet{kornowski2024} obtained an O(dδ−1ε−3)\mathcal{O}(dδ^{-1}ε^{-3}) oracle complexity for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization and asked whether its dependence on all three parameters is jointly optimal. Although the dimension dependence and the first-order dependence on (δ,ε)(δ,ε) are separately known to be unavoidable, a matching zeroth-order lower bound has remained open. We answer this question in the unrestricted full-space setting. For smooth stochastic nonconvex optimization, we establish a scalar-oracle lower bound of Ω ⁣(dL02min⁡{ΔH,L02}/ε4)Ω\!\left(dL_0^2\min\{ΔH,L_0^2\}/ε^4\right) assuming a smooth, globally lower-bounded population objective and a second-moment bound on sample Lipschitz constants. A smooth reduction then yields a lower bound for Goldstein stationarity, proving the joint minimax optimality of the dependence on (d,δ,ε)(d,δ,ε) under explicit high-dimensional and small-accuracy conditions. Crucially, our results allow algorithms to query arbitrary points in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, adaptively select sample-function labels, reuse the same sampled function at any number of locations, and output points without spatial restrictions. Thus, unlike lower bounds based on bounded query regions or fresh evaluation noise, our guarantees apply to a fully adaptive, reusable-sample scalar oracle. We also establish a separate noiseless exact-value lower bound against randomized algorithms, and hence also against deterministic methods. Our proof combines a globally defined sequential nonconvex construction with an exact Gaussian scalar channel, multistage random-field estimates, and an antithetic finite-sample realization that preserves information hardness under adaptive reuse.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 23, 2026

Zeroth-Order Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise

This paper considers the nonconvex nonsmooth problem in which the objective function is Lipschitz continuous. We focus on the stochastic setting where the algorithm can access stochastic function value evaluations with heavy-tailed noise, which is prevalent in many popular machine learning applications. We propose a stochastic zeroth-order algorithm that refines the framework of online-to-nonconvex conversion by clipping the two-point gradient estimator. The theoretical analysis shows that our algorithm can find a (δ,ε)(δ, ε)-Goldstein stationary point with zeroth-order oracle complexity of O(dp2(p−1)δ−1ε−2p−1p−1){\mathcal O}(d^{\frac{p}{2(p-1)}}δ^{-1}ε^{-\frac{2p-1}{p-1}}), where dd is the problem dimension and p∈(1,2]p\in(1,2] is the order of bounded moments. Note that our dependence on dimension dd matches the best-known results of stochastic zeroth-order optimization for finding the sub-optimal solution of a stochastic convex nonsmooth problem. In addition, our dependence on accuracy parameters δδ and εε is consistent with that of the best-known stochastic first-order algorithms for stochastic nonconvex nonsmooth problems. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Oct 1, 2026

Lower Bounds for Stochastic First-Order Algorithms with Variance Reduction in Nonconvex--Concave Minimax Optimization

We establish complexity lower bounds for stochastic first-order algorithms in nonconvex--concave minimax optimization, allowing algorithms to use variance reduction. Our main contribution is a lower bound for a zero-respecting algorithm class that permits variance reduction, extending beyond the algorithmic restrictions imposed by some existing lower bounds. We consider objectives with an LL-Lipschitz continuous joint gradient, a compact convex dual domain of Euclidean radius at most DYD_Y, and a primal value function, defined by maximizing the objective over the dual variable, with initial suboptimality at most ΔΔ. The target accuracy ε\varepsilon is measured by the gradient norm of the Moreau envelope of the constrained primal value function with parameter 1/(2L)1/(2L). Under an unbiased stochastic first-order oracle with variance at most σ2σ^2 and mean-square smoothness, we prove the lower bound Ω ⁣(L2DYΔε−3+L3DY2Δσ2ε−6)Ω\!\left(L^2D_YΔ\varepsilon^{-3}+L^3D_Y^2Δσ^2\varepsilon^{-6}\right). This result quantifies the dependence on accuracy, dual-domain radius, and oracle noise even when variance reduction is allowed. We also establish complementary lower bounds for nonconvex--strongly-concave minimax optimization. With dual strong-concavity parameter μ>0μ>0 and condition number κ:=L/μκ:=L/μ, we obtain Ω ⁣(LΔκ ε−2+LΔκσ2ε−4)Ω\!\left(LΔ\sqrtκ\,\varepsilon^{-2}+LΔκσ^2\varepsilon^{-4}\right) under the bounded-variance oracle model. Under the additional mean-square smoothness condition with constant Lˉ\bar L, we obtain Ω ⁣(LΔκ ε−2+ΔLˉσκ3/2ε−3)Ω\!\left(LΔ\sqrtκ\,\varepsilon^{-2}+Δ\bar Lσκ^{3/2}\varepsilon^{-3}\right). Together, these results identify complexity barriers across the concave and strongly concave regimes, with the main nonconvex--concave bound remaining valid for algorithms that use variance reduction.
Aug 10, 2026

A Tight Lower Bound for Smooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization with Bounded Gradient Noise

We prove a sharp lower bound for smooth nonconvex stochastic optimization with uniformly bounded gradient noise. In the K=1K=1 fresh-sample model, every randomized adaptive algorithm requires Ω(ΔLε2+ΔLσ2ε4)Ω\left( \frac{ΔL}{ε^2} + \frac{ΔLσ^2}{ε^4} \right) queries to find a point with expected gradient norm at most εε. This matches the standard upper bound and, to the best of our knowledge, resolves the question raised by [Arjevani et al. 2023] of whether almost-surely bounded oracle error permits a better rate than bounded variance. The proof was independently generated with GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex's Ultra mode during a two-hour session. The human author supplied the prompt and was responsible only forchecking the proof and revising and polishing the manuscript.