One-shot Human Video-Guided Adaptation for Vision-Language-Action Models
Authors: Qi Chen, Yuwei Wu, Quan Chen, Kunpeng Gao, Jin Chen, Che Sun, Zhi Gao, Yunde Jia
Organizations: Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Technology, School of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology. · Guangdong Laboratory of Machine Perception and Intelligent Computing, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University. · AInnovation Technology Group Co., Ltd.
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have recently achieved remarkable progress by leveraging large-scale robot datasets and foundation models for general-purpose robot manipulation. However, their ability to rapidly adapt to novel manipulation tasks beyond the training distribution remains limited. Existing approaches often require task-specific robot demonstrations and additional training, which are labor- and compute-intensive, limiting the scalability of VLA adaptation to open-world scenarios. To reduce this dependence on target-task robot data, we propose CapPro, a framework that enables a VLA policy to adapt to previously unseen manipulation tasks using only a single human demonstration video. CapPro consists of two components. First, a phase-aware human video representation module constructs a compact video representation through learned visual token selection and learns task-relevant query representations under phase-caption supervision. Second, a video-conditioned adaptation module jointly incorporates the compact video and query-derived representations into the action-conditioning context of the pretrained VLA policy. % This design introduces task-specific guidance while largely preserving the original VLA action-generation backbone. In this way, the human demonstration provides task-specific execution guidance rather than an embodiment-aligned trajectory to imitate, without requiring target-task robot demonstrations or target-task fine-tuning. Experiments across source and unseen target tasks show that CapPro improves average performance across unseen target groups while maintaining comparable performance on the source tasks. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of human-video guidance for cross-task VLA adaptation.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overview of the proposed one-shot human-video-guided VLA adaptation framework. Our framework consists of a phase-aware human video representation module and a video-conditioned adaptation module, which respectively extract task-relevant guidance from a human demonstration in the context of the current robot observation and incorporate the resulting guidance into the VLA policy for action generation. Phase-level auxiliary supervision is used only during training and is not required at inference time.
Split
# Tasks
Task Shift
Source
13
Source training
Target-A1
6
Near-task shift
Target-A2
10
Object / interaction / affordance shift
Target-B
10
Compositional task shift
TABLE I: RoboTwin task splits used in our experiments.
Hyperparameter
Value
Human support frames Ns
8
GridS tokens per frame S
32
Learnable query tokens M
4
Caption loss weight λcap
0.1
Action gate initialization
0.1
Batch size
128
TABLE II: Key hyperparameters used in our experiments.
Method
Source
Target-A1
Target-A2
Target-B
Overall
π0.5
64.4
34.5
2.5
4.0
28.4
Direct Video Prefix
43.5
25.2
1.5
1.4
19.1
CapPro
68.9
44.8
29.0
20.7
42.6
TABLE III: Success rates (%) on the RoboTwin task splits. All methods use the same Source training data. Results are averaged over the clean and randomized evaluation settings.
Variant
Source
Target-A1
Target-A2
Target-B
Target Avg.
Full CapPro
68.9
44.8
29.0
20.7
29.5
w/o GridS
w/o Phase-Aware Caption
76.5
39.9
5.9
3.1
12.7
w/o Caption Loss
w/o Query-to-Action Guidance
w/o Human Video Progress
TABLE IV: Ablation study of the proposed components. Results are reported as task success rates (%), averaged over the clean and randomized evaluation settings. Target Avg. denotes the average over all 26 target tasks.
Split
Task
π0.5
CapPro
Source
Coke → box
3/5 (60%)
Source
Marker → holder
5/5 (100%)
Source
Fold short-sleeve garment
5/5 (100%)
Target-A
Beverage → box
5/5 (100%)
Target-A
Cable → box
4/5 (80%)
Target-B
Fold pants
0/5 (0%)
TABLE V: Real-world manipulation results. Each task is evaluated over five trials. Results are reported as successful trials and success rates.