World action models (WAMs) jointly predict future visual states and robot actions, but processing dense future-frame tokens incurs substantial inference latency. We propose CF-Prune, a training-free framework for pruning future-frame tokens in pretrained WAMs. Our key insight is that future visual predictions support action generation and therefore need not preserve every visual detail required for high-fidelity video synthesis. CF-Prune combines instruction and action attention to identify task-relevant tokens during the initial denoising forward pass, even when future-frame and action representations remain highly noisy. An entropy-based phase identification mechanism further retains dense computation during precision phases to mitigate pruning-induced performance degradation. Experiments on RoboLab, RoboCasa, and real-world manipulation tasks demonstrate consistent inference speedups. At a 35% pruning ratio, CF-Prune achieves average speedups of 1.19-1.27x while improving task success rates. At a 50% pruning ratio, it achieves 1.29-1.33x average speedups on both simulation benchmarks, with overall success rates within 1.0 percentage point of the baseline.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Rethinking future-video generation for action prediction.
Figure 2: Overview of CF-Prune. k denotes the current denoising step, and K is the total number of denoising steps.
Figure 3: Real-world experimental setup and the three manipulation tasks used for evaluation.
Method
Variant
Success Rate (%)
Speedup
FLOPs
Simple
Moderate
Complex
Overall
Coarse
Average
Dense
–
40.3
34.1
27.6
36.5
–
1.00×
100%
SpecPrune-VLA
Obs-only (70%)
33.4
33.8
24.7
32.3
1.07×
1.06×
93.1%
Obs + future (25%)
36.9
28.2
23.5
32.2
1.26×
1.23×
77.5%
SP-VLA
Obs-only (70%)
34.4
24.1
21.2
29.2
1.05×
1.05×
93.1%
Obs + future (25%)
37.5
32.3
23.5
33.8
1.24×
1.24×
77.5%
Table 1: Results on RoboLab. Success rates are averaged over tasks. Coarse phase latency excludes precision phases, while average latency and FLOPs are averaged over all inference calls.
Method
Variant
Success Rate (%)
Speedup
FLOPs
Artic.
Transfer
Control
Nav.
Overall
Coarse
Average
Dense
–
95.0
55.0
72.0
38.0
65.0
–
1.00×
100%
SpecPrune-VLA
Obs-only (70%)
65.0
17.0
72.0
44.0
49.5
1.06×
1.05×
95.4%
Obs + future (25%)
92.0
51.0
78.0
36.0
64.3
1.21×
1.17×
82.8%
SP-VLA
Obs-only (70%)
82.0
27.0
75.0
42.0
56.5
1.07×
1.07×
93.7%
Obs + future (25%)
94.0
38.0
90.0
37.0
64.8
1.18×
1.17×
82.8%
Table 2: Results on four representative RoboCasa tasks, with 100 rollouts per task. The columns represent articulation (OpenStandMixerHead), object transfer (CoffeeSetupMug), device control (TurnOnElectricKettle), and navigation (NavigateKitchen).
Method
Success Rate (%)
Speedup
Emergency Button
Block Pick-and-Place
Block Stacking
Overall
Coarse
Average
Dense
84.0
92.0
80.0
85.3
–
1.00×
CF-Prune ( α=35% )
88.0
96.0
88.0
90.7
1.37×
1.27×
Table 3: Real-world evaluation results. Success rates are measured over 25 rollouts per task, and Overall denotes the average success rate across the three tasks.
Selection Strategy
Success Rate (%)
Instruction-only
34.0
Action-only
30.8
Instruction-first
34.3
Action-first (Ours)
35.3
Table 4: Token selection strategy ablation on RoboLab at 35% pruning.
Figure 4: Layer-wise normalized attention entropy at the first denoising step across sampled RoboLab tasks. In each subfigure, the left heatmap shows entropy over rollout progress averaged across tasks, while the right shows task-wise entropy averaged over sampled rollout stages.
Figure 5: Effect of Gaussian smoothing on token pruning. Navy cells mark pruned positions in the first future latent frame, overlaid on the input observation.
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 6: Camera views used in our real-world experiments. The right and front views provide third-person observations, while the wrist-mounted camera captures local interactions near the gripper.
Figure 7: Comparison of the token selection strategies in Table 4 on the same RoboLab scene at 35% pruning. All variants use the same attention scores and 5×5 Gaussian smoothing. Navy cells indicate pruned positions.
Figure 8: Examples of future-token pruning at 35% and 50% on RoboLab, RoboCasa, and recorded real-world inputs. Navy cells indicate pruned positions.
Figure 9: Representative real-world rollouts of the dense baseline and CF-Prune on emergency-button pressing, block pick-and-place, and block stacking. Each row shows eight selected frames illustrating task progression from left to right.
World-action models (WAMs) leverage pretrained video models to improve generalization in robot control by jointly predicting future visual states and actions. This capability comes at a substantial inference cost, as dense future-frame tokens are repeatedly processed during denoising. Prior methods address this by token pruning that prioritizes visual fidelity to reduce denoising costs in video diffusion models. However, these methods do not use action relevance to determine which future-frame tokens to retain during joint denoising in WAMs. In this paper, we propose Sparse-WAM, a training-free framework for action-guided sparse imagination that selectively processes future-frame tokens to accelerate WAM inference. We observe substantial overlap in the spatial distribution of attention from action tokens to future-frame tokens (action-to-future attention) between consecutive denoising steps, despite continued updates to the future representations. Motivated by this, we develop Action-Guided Token Selection to retain frame-specific action-relevant regions together with cross-frame context. However, a naive implementation can incur attention-scoring and token-packing overhead that offsets the computational savings from pruning. We therefore introduce Pilot, an efficient engine that reduces sparse inference overhead through lightweight scoring and cross-step reuse of token selections. On LIBERO with FastWAM-Joint and RoboLab-120 with Cosmos 3 Edge, Sparse-WAM achieves inference speedups of approximately 2.0× and 1.8×, respectively, over dense eager inference on an NVIDIA RTX 4090, while largely preserving task performance.
World-Action Models (WAMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for embodied control by coupling future visual prediction with action generation. However, most existing WAMs rely on photorealistic future prediction, which incurs high inference latency and makes real-time robot deployment difficult. This motivates a more efficient WAM design that preserves the control benefits of future visual prediction while reducing its inference cost. We introduce Efficient-WAM, a World-Action Model that reduces the cost of future imagination while preserving its control benefit. Efficient-WAM improves inference efficiency via a compact video expert transferred from WAN-2.2-5B, token-sparse video latents, and asymmetric video-action denoising that allocates fewer sampling steps to video than to actions. Instead of optimizing the future branch for visual fidelity, Efficient-WAM treats future video prediction as a compact guidance signal for action generation. Comprehensive experiments on RoboTwin 2.0 and real-world manipulation tasks show that Efficient-WAM maintains strong action performance despite visibly coarse future predictions. While maintaining competitive control capabilities, our 1B-parameter model can reduce per-chunk latency to around 100 ms during physical deployment, achieving a 30x speedup over existing WAMs.
Jiajun Li, Tiecheng Guo, Yifan Ye +9
1The University of Hong Kong · 2Peking University · 3Muka Robotics +2
World action models (WAMs) predict the future alongside actions during training. Due to the heavy computation cost of video denoising, whether the future must still be generated during inference is disputed: Explicit WAMs denoise it into clean frames along with every action chunk, whereas Latent WAMs discard it entirely for acceleration. We find that latent WAMs, despite matching explicit ones on in-distribution tasks, fail to retain the generalization benefits that originally motivated WAMs. To demonstrate this, we evaluate generalization along three axes: environmental perturbation, data efficiency, and task generalization. Controlled comparisons with a matched backbone, training data, and budget reveal consistent degradation across all three axes when the action expert no longer conditions on future representations. Further analysis shows that the gap arises almost entirely from the first denoising step: the benefit comes from preparing the future, not generating it. We therefore propose Simple-WAM, which simplifies future modeling into a single forward pass of fully noised video tokens and adapts the training-time noise schedule to this inference behavior. Across simulation and real-world tasks, Simple-WAM achieves the best of both worlds, leading explicit WAMs in generalization performance with efficiency comparable to Latent WAMs. Project Page: https://zrporz.github.io/Simple-WAM-Web/
Renping Zhou, Zanlin Ni, Zihao Fan +8
Leap Lab, Tsinghua University · University of Science and Technology of China · Beijing Institute of Technology