Generating novel views from limited observations requires preserving both the appearance and spatial structure of a scene. Although recent approaches exploit fine-grained geometric cues, they do not explicitly model high-level semantic and spatial properties such as object identity, attributes, and inter-object relationships. In this work, we investigate whether 3D language understanding can provide complementary supervision for novel-view generation. We introduce Ask4NV, built on a pretrained unified multimodal model with a Mixture-of-Transformers (MoT) architecture. Our model incorporates camera geometry into both VAE and ViT representations and leverages understanding features during generation through joint self-attention with a modality-aware attention masking strategy. Experiments demonstrate strong image quality and geometric consistency in novel-view generation, alongside competitive 3D language understanding. Further analysis shows that joint training improves cross-view correspondence in VAE representations and similarity in a 3D-aware feature space.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: We present Ask4NV , which enhances novel-view generation through 3D language understanding. Within a Mixture-of-Transformers architecture, 3D language understanding supervision trains the understanding transformer to interpret scene semantics and spatial relationships. During novel-view generation, joint self-attention combines this knowledge with the generation transformer’s visual synthesis capabilities. Ask4NV achieves higher PSNR than the baseline trained solely on novel-view generation on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets.
Figure 2: Shared scene properties across 3D language understanding and novel-view generation. Questions about object categories, attributes, and spatial relationships address the same scene properties that should be represented in novel views. The knowledge required to answer these questions can provide complementary semantic and spatial supervision for novel-view generation.
Figure 3: Overall architecture of Ask4NV. Given source images and camera parameters of the source and target views, (a) for novel-view generation, the images are first encoded into VAE and ViT features by their respective visual encoders, and camera geometry is incorporated into these representations before they are passed to the transformers. (b) The generation transformer processes the camera-aware VAE tokens, while the understanding transformer processes the camera-aware ViT tokens together with text tokens for 3D language understanding. (c) During novel-view generation, these modality-specific tokens interact through joint self-attention under a unified modality-aware attention mask.
Figure 4: Layer-wise cross-view correspondence. We report PCK@1, PCK@2, and PCK@4 across Transformer layers on ScanNet ( Dai et al., 2017 ) for Lance-FT ( Fu et al., 2026 ) and Ask4NV. Layer l=26 exhibits the strongest correspondence across all PCK thresholds.
Dataset
Method
PCK@1
PCK@2
PCK@4
ScanNet
Lance-FT
30.30
42.03
58.22
Lance-FT + ViT
38.77
54.93
72.09
Ask4NV (Ours)
46.13
60.73
74.99
ScanNet++
Lance-FT
33.34
44.31
60.28
Lance-FT + ViT
31.40
44.91
63.87
Ask4NV (Ours)
43.27
55.25
69.55
Table 1: Cross-view Correspondence at Layer 26. We report PCK@1, PCK@2, and PCK@4 on ScanNet and ScanNet++ for Lance-FT, Lance-FT + ViT and Ask4NV.
Method
DL3DV
ScanNet
Re10K
ScanNet++
Lance-FT
0.512
0.498
0.580
0.514
Lance-FT + ViT
0.546
0.555
0.636
0.538
Ask4NV (Ours)
0.599
0.557
0.680
0.557
Table 2: Patch-wise feature similarity between generated and ground-truth views. We report feature similarity on DL3DV, ScanNet, RealEstate10K (Re10K), and ScanNet++.
Dataset
Method
2D Metrics
3D Metrics
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
ATE ↓
RPE r ↓
RPE t ↓
MEt3R ↓
DL3DV
CAT3D † ( Gao et al., 2024 )
12.662
0.287
0.489
0.777
15.59
1.674
0.446
Matrix3D ( Lu et al., 2025 )
13.997
0.344
0.412
0.351
4.80
0.691
0.358
NVComposer ( Li et al., 2025 )
11.532
0.255
0.560
0.995
32.34
1.748
0.511
CAMEO ( Kwon et al., 2025 )
12.991
0.312
0.463
0.628
13.16
1.174
0.388
Omni-View ( Hu et al., 2026 )
13.009
0.221
0.558
1.226
27.86
2.514
0.511
Table 3: Evaluation of novel view generation. We evaluate on DL3DV and ScanNet (in-domain for Ask4NV) and ScanNet++ and Re10K (out-of-domain for Ask4NV). We report metrics for both 2D image fidelity and 3D geometric consistency. † denotes the reproduced CAT3D model. Bold and underline indicate the best and second-best, respectively.
Figure 5: Qualitative results of novel view generation of Ask4NV and baselines on in-domain DL3DV ( Ling et al., 2024 ) and out-of-domain ScanNet++ ( Yeshwanth et al., 2023 ) . Blue and red cameras indicate source and target viewpoints, respectively.
Table 4: Evaluation of 3D language understanding. We provide quantitative comparison of Ask4NV and baselines on 3D question answering (SQA3D ( Ma et al., 2022 ) and ScanQA ( Azuma et al., 2022 ) ) and 3D visual grounding (ScanRefer ( Chen et al., 2020 ) and Multi3DRefer ( Zhang et al., 2023 ) ). Results are reported from prior works, and “-” indicates an unavailable result. C, B-4, M, and R denote CIDEr, BLEU-4, METEOR, and ROUGE, respectively.
Source
Method
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
Views
N=2
Lance-FT
13.001
0.294
0.459
Ask4NV (Ours)
13.900
0.329
0.388
N=3
Lance-FT
13.292
0.298
0.430
Ask4NV (Ours)
14.559
0.344
0.355
Table 5: Ablation on different numbers of source views.
Method
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
Unidirectional
13.653
0.314
0.424
Bidirectional (Ours)
14.939
0.355
0.313
Table 6: Ablation on bidirectional VAE attention.
Appendix figures & tables12 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Dataset
Joint
Gen-ViT
Und-VAE
2D Metrics
3D Metrics
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
ATE ↓
RPE r ↓
RPE t ↓
MEt3R ↓
DL3DV
✗
✗
✗
13.291
0.297
0.432
0.185
3.80
0.354
0.361
✗
✓
✗
13.878
0.321
0.384
0.267
5.37
0.498
0.367
✓
✓
✓
13.482
0.313
0.421
0.380
5.96
0.681
0.407
✓
✓
✗
14.939
0.355
0.313
0.158
3.11
0.298
0.349
ScanNet
✗
✗
✗
14.292
0.530
0.518
0.233
15.45
0.351
0.398
Appendix
Table 7: Ablation on joint training settings for novel-view generation. All Gen-ViT configurations use the same generation-side camera conditioning.
Table 8: Ablation on joint training settings for 3D language understanding.
Figure 6: Cross-view correspondence accuracy throughout training.
Figure 7: Visualization of cross-view VAE feature similarity.
Dataset
ViT–VAE
Noise–Clean
2D Metrics
3D Metrics
bidir.
bidir.
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
ATE ↓
RPE r↓
RPE t↓
MEt3R ↓
DL3DV
✗
✗
13.573
0.310
0.410
0.378
6.54
0.687
0.373
✗
✓
13.945
0.326
0.384
0.319
6.28
0.607
0.363
✓
✗
13.653
0.314
0.424
0.409
5.59
0.748
0.406
✓
✓
14.939
0.355
0.313
0.158
3.11
0.298
0.349
ScanNet
✗
✗
15.542
0.557
0.446
0.200
13.03
0.348
0.420
Appendix
Table 9: Ablation on bidirectional attention between visual tokens.
Dataset
QA
Grounding
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
DL3DV
✓
✗
13.66
0.313
0.402
✗
✓
13.03
0.291
0.453
✓
✓
12.92
0.285
0.451
ScanNet
✓
✗
13.94
0.525
0.524
✗
✓
13.50
0.514
0.552
✓
✓
13.54
0.510
0.546
Appendix
Table 10: Ablation on the composition of 3D language understanding supervision.
Figure 8: Additional qualitative results of novel view generation on DL3DV, comparing Ask4NV with baseline methods. Blue and red cameras indicate source and target viewpoints, respectively.
Figure 9: Additional qualitative results of novel view generation on ScanNet, comparing Ask4NV with baseline methods. Blue and red cameras indicate source and target viewpoints, respectively.
Figure 10: Additional qualitative results of novel view generation on Re10K, comparing Ask4NV with baseline methods. Blue and red cameras indicate source and target viewpoints, respectively.
Figure 11: Additional qualitative results of novel view generation on ScanNet++, comparing Ask4NV with baseline methods. Blue and red cameras indicate source and target viewpoints, respectively.
Figure 12: Additional qualitative results of novel view generation on N=3 source views, comparing Ask4NV with baseline methods. Blue and red cameras indicate source and target viewpoints, respectively.
Figure 13: Additional qualitative results of novel view generation on N=2 source views, comparing Ask4NV with baseline methods. Blue and red cameras indicate source and target viewpoints, respectively.
Current Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) struggle with spatial reasoning tasks requiring viewpoint-dependent understanding, largely because they are confined to a single, static observation. We propose Thinking with Novel Views (TwNV), a paradigm that integrates generative novel-view synthesis into the reasoning loop: a Reasoner LMM identifies spatial ambiguity, instructs a Painter to synthesize an alternative viewpoint, and re-examines the scene with the additional evidence. Through systematic experiments we address three research questions. (1) Instruction format: numerical camera-pose specifications yield more reliable view control than free-form language. (2) Generation fidelity: synthesized view quality is tightly coupled with downstream spatial accuracy. (3) Inference-time visual scaling: iterative multi-turn view refinement further improves performance, echoing recent scaling trends in language reasoning. Across four spatial subtask categories and four LMM architectures (both closed- and open-source), TwNV consistently improves accuracy by +1.3 to +3.9 pp, with the largest gains on viewpoint-sensitive subtasks. These results establish novel-view generation as a practical lever for advancing spatial intelligence of LMMs.
Recent works augment Vision-Language Models with geometry features from pretrained 3D models, expecting that the geometric signal will boost spatial reasoning. However, we find that simply fusing geometry features and training on standard spatial QA yields only marginal improvements on high-level multi-hop tasks. We attribute this gap to a training-signal problem: standard spatial QA can be largely answered from visual features and language priors, so the geometry pathway receives weak gradients and fails to integrate with the visual features. To provide a training signal that requires geometry, we propose novel-view semantic rendering as an auxiliary training task that requires the model to predict the semantic layout of an unobserved viewpoint, inspired by humans' ability to mentally simulate novel viewpoints during spatial reasoning. This task encourages joint use of both pathways: geometry provides pose-dependent visibility, while vision provides semantic content. Our auxiliary task yields consistent improvements over the geometry-augmented baseline across all three benchmarks (up to +1.6 on VSI-Bench, +2.2 on ReVSI, +2.9 on our 3D-Point-QA dataset) and our full model surpasses prior open-source methods on VSI-Bench and on ReVSI. Project page: https://yuqunw.github.io/Render2Reason/.
Novel view synthesis from sparse images must reconcile faithful reconstruction of observed regions with plausible completion of unseen content, while maintaining world consistency across viewpoints. Existing geometry-based methods preserve observed scene structure but often struggle to complete unseen regions, whereas video generative models offer rich appearance priors but accumulate inconsistencies during sequential view generation. We propose GeoVerse, a framework that synthesizes world-consistent novel views by performing generation within the geometric latent space of a pretrained 3D foundation model and injecting appearance priors from a video generative model. Specifically, GeoVerse extracts multilevel features from Wan2.2 VACE and injects them into the geometric latent diffusion model via a ControlNet-style adapter, incorporating video-learned appearance priors to enhance structural completion. To enforce cross-view coherence, a global spatial memory continuously aggregates observed and synthesized content, reprojecting target-aligned guidance to anchor subsequent predictions to a shared scene representation. Extensive experiments across diverse datasets demonstrate improved visual quality and geometric consistency, with a 2.23 dB higher PSNR on DL3DV and 32.4% lower ATE on Mip-NeRF360 compared to GLD.
Kerui Ren, Tao Lu, Linning Xu +5
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · The Chinese University of Hong Kong +3