stat.MLOct 14, 2026

A polylogarithmic bound for list replicability

Authors: Ari Blondal, Hamed Hatami, Pooya Hatami, Chavdar Lalov, Sivan Tretiak

Organizations: McGill University · Ohio State University

Abstract

Zhang [Zha26] recently posted a manuscript announcing that the list-replicability number of every class of M≥2M\ge 2 binary concepts on N≥2N\ge 2 domain points is O(log⁡2Mlog⁡N)O(\log^2 M\log N), which would be the first polylogarithmic upper bound on this quantity. In this note, we present a short, self-contained proof of this bound, following the high-level approach of the manuscript but with considerably simpler arguments.

Explore similar work

Jun 4, 2026

Tight list replicability bounds via a novel sphere covering theorem

In recent years, list replicability has emerged as a framework for formalizing reproducibility in learning theory. A central question is how the required list size relates to the accuracy parameter and natural complexity measures of the hypothesis class. To achieve sharp bounds on list replicability, we prove a novel topological sphere covering theorem, derived from the Borsuk-Ulam theorem. Specifically, if the dd-sphere is covered by open sets, each of which lies in an open hemisphere, then d+1d+1 of these sets must have a common intersection. Using this result, we obtain a sharp bound on the relationship between list size and accuracy for VC classes. We also show that for large-margin half-spaces, provided the margin is not too large, the optimal list size equals the ambient dimension. However, when the margin is taken to be very large, we devise a replicable algorithm achieving the minimal list size of ⌈d/2⌉+1\lceil d/2 \rceil + 1.
Jun 16, 2026

Sign-Rank, Index, and List Replicability: Connections and Separations

In learning theory, the sign rank of a binary concept class captures the smallest dimension in which it can be represented by points and halfspaces. Despite tremendous interest, lower bounds on sign rank are notoriously difficult to come by. Two recent approaches to the problem establish lower bounds on sign rank by measures that are easier to analyze: the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-index and the list replicability number. We order these measures, showing that the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-index is upper-bounded by a linear function of the list replicability number. As a main consequence, we obtain a strong separation between sign rank and Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-index, thereby resolving a question of Frick, Hosseini, and Vasileuski. This motivates a thorough study of list replicability, the stronger of the two lower-bounding measures. We establish upper bounds on the list replicability number by two combinatorial measures: height and minimum star number. We also prove a fundamental composition result, showing that the product of two concept classes has list replicability number bounded by the sum of the list replicability numbers of the two classes.
Oct 18, 2026

The Optimal Sample Complexity of Pointwise Replicable Agnostic Learning

Pointwise replicability asks that two independently trained predictors, using the same random seed, agree at each fixed query with high probability. We determine its optimal agnostic sample complexity on finite and countable domains. For every nonempty binary class of finite VC dimension d≥1d\ge1, the required number of independent examples is Θ ⁣(dρ2α2+log⁡(1/β)α2)Θ\!\left(\frac{d}{ρ^2α^2}+\frac{\log(1/β)}{α^2}\right), uniformly over independent accuracy, failure, and disagreement parameters α,β,ρ∈(0,1/10)α,β,ρ\in(0,1/10). The learner returns one binary function, may be improper, and uses unrestricted shared randomness. Its sample budget is fixed before observing data, and the replicability guarantee includes queries of zero marginal mass. The main construction combines an ensemble of empirical-risk minimizers with a smooth, signal-dependent risk decomposition. A single shared phase selects the final binary predictor. Record times certify its weak-signal risk, while a uniform bound protects the strong-signal risk at that same selected time. A phase-comparison theorem controls the actual shared-seed execution under simultaneous changes in the marginals and risk coefficients. A rare repair step then makes the confidence cost additive. Together with matching lower bounds, this removes the remaining logarithmic overhead and parameter restrictions in the general countable-domain sample-complexity problem. This extended version also retains the earlier explicit constructions and their proofs, including proper learning for VC-one classes, the full finite-atom class, a faster realizable bound, and counterexamples that separate restrictions of particular algorithms from restrictions of the learning problem.