cs.CVOct 14, 2026

DeSpatial: The devil of Agentic Spatial Reasoning Lies in 3D Itself

Authors: Yifei Liu, Xiaolong Zhou, Ziyang Gong, Yifan Zhou, Yuanyuan Gao, Yuning Gong, Yuchen Yang, Hongjie Zhang, 

Organizations: Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · Beihang University · Shanghai Jiaotong University · HKUST · 

Abstract

Spatial agents have access to reconstruction and segmentation tools, yet inconsistent predictions and fragmented object identities can prevent their outputs from becoming reliable 3D scene information. A simple oracle experiment exposes this perception bottleneck: replacing tool-predicted perception with ground-truth 3D bounding boxes raises an agent to nearly full score across five object-centric VSI-Bench tasks, while retaining the same reasoning tools. Motivated by this finding, we believe the devil of spatial reasoning lies in 3D itself, and introduce DeSpatial(Devil of Spatial), which explicitly decomposes spatial understanding into perception and reasoning. DeSpatial has a shared 3D perception tool to reconcile independent perception outputs into a unified, metric, gravity-aligned 3D scene. This perception tool has two core components: a) a joint segmentation--depth co-refinement module that consolidates masks of the same object and removes projection artifacts caused by inconsistent segmentation and depth within a single frame; b) a cross-view instance fusion module that consolidate voxel-overlapping instances but not allowed to merge same-frame instances. This fusion module additionally fuses spatially disjoint fragments caused by insufficient multi-view observations, by checking their 3D structure and source mask appearance. After receiving the complete and unified 3D scene information, the agent chooses reasoning or computational tools to solve the spatial problem. DeSpatial achieves leading performance on VSI-Bench, MindCube-Tiny, and ViewSpatial, with additional long-video results on VSI-SUPER, revealing the bottleneck of spatial understanding lies in a precise 3D perception itself.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Jun 18, 2026

S-Agent: Spatial Tool-Use Elicits Reasoning for Spatial Intelligence

Real-world spatial intelligence requires reasoning over a continuous and evolving 3D world, yet existing VLMs and tool-augmented agents largely remain tied to static, stateless inference from isolated visual observations. We introduce S-Agent, a spatial tool-use agentic paradigm for understanding and reasoning over continuous multi-view images and videos. By formulating spatial reasoning as spatio-temporal evidence accumulation rather than isolated frame-level prediction, S-Agent reshapes spatial perception into scene-centric understanding beyond frame-centric recognition. Specifically, S-Agent casts the VLM as a semantic planner that decides what evidence is needed, while a hierarchy of spatial tools and experts grounds objects in 2D, lifts them into 3D geometric evidence, and aggregates this evidence into high-level spatial knowledge (e.g., counting, measurement, orientation, and relative position). Additionally, a temporal memory mechanism, including Scene Memory for maintaining the evolving scene state and Agent Memory for accumulating reasoning context, enables evidence integration across frames and reasoning steps. Comprehensive experiments on multi-view and video spatial reasoning benchmarks show that S-Agent consistently improves both open-source and closed-source VLMs in a training-free manner. Beyond inference-time augmentation, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on S-Agent-generated spatial trajectories S-300K yields S-Agent-8B, a compact spatial agent that significantly surpasses similar-scale baselines (e.g., Qwen3-VL-8B) and performs comparably to advanced closed-source models (e.g., GPT-5.4 and Gemini 3).
Oct 20, 2026

S-Agent 2.0: Spatial Reasoning with a General Coding Agent

Spatial reasoning asks a model to work out where objects are in 3D space, how they relate to one another, and how they move. Agentic VLMs have recently brought large improvements on such tasks by letting the model actively gather evidence with 3D perception tools instead of answering in a single pass. Even so, on many questions the tools return the right evidence and the model still does not arrive at the correct answer: the gap between model and tools, where raw readings become usable conclusions, is left unfilled. We present S-Agent 2.0, a spatial reasoning agent that equips an off-the-shelf general coding agent with a command-line perception toolkit, and we design the interface around one principle: help the VLM close the evidence loop: acquire scene evidence, remember it in a persistent scene memory, and interpret each reading in plain spatial language. This design keeps the full flexibility of a coding agent, and every reading it acts on stays grounded in the tools' geometry. On MMSI-Bench and ReVSI, the toolkit improves a strong open-source model, Qwen3.8-27B, by +13.9 and +20.5 points over the same agent without tools, and a strong closed-source model, Gemini-3.8-Flash, by +11.2 and +9.6 points. With the open backbone S-Agent 2.0 reaches 66.5 on MMSI-Bench and 82.3 on ReVSI, ahead of the specialized system SpatialClaw on the same backbone (62.6 and 74.5), and with Gemini-3.8-Flash it reaches 74.1 and 90.5 against its 67.0 and 79.7. Both tool gains shrink as the backbone grows more capable, but SpatialClaw's shrinks far more on ReVSI, from +13.2 to +2.7, while ours stays at +9.6. S-Agent 2.0 also works across different general coding agent harnesses, such as Codex and Claude Code.
May 29, 2026

SpatialAct: Probing Spatial Reasoning-to-Action Capabilities of VLM Agents in 3D Scenes

Humans can effortlessly perceive spatial layouts, form cognitive representations, reason about spatial relations, and translate such reasoning into actions in everyday 3D environments. Although recent vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising performance on observation-conditioned spatial perception and reasoning tasks, it remains unclear whether they can build coherent spatial understanding, act upon it, and refine their actions through multi-turn feedback. To study this problem, we introduce SpatialAct, a simulator-grounded benchmark for probing action-conditioned spatial reasoning in 3D scenes. Starting from the most challenging setting, Multi-turn Interactive Refinement, we further design its decomposed counterpart, Single-step Error Detection and Fix, together with five fundamental spatial ability tasks to diagnose the underlying causes of model failures. Experiments reveal a clear reasoning-to-action gap: current VLMs can perform well on isolated spatial reasoning tasks, but struggle to maintain coherent spatial beliefs and produce reliable actions during multi-turn feedback, substantially underperforming humans. These results suggest that current VLM agents still lack robust spatial state tracking under action-induced environment changes, even when low-level control is abstracted away.