Compression Does Not End at Selection: Post-Selection Positional Geometry for Sparse KV Caches

Cross-request KV caching reduces the prefill cost of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), but conventional prefix caching severely limits cache reuse across requests. Position-Independent Caching (PIC) removes this constraint by reusing independent chunks, but their KV states miss cross-chunk interactions. Existing methods selectively recompute token states to recover these missing interactions, but primarily allocate the recomputation budget to selecting which states to recompute, while fixing the recomputation context to the full causal prefix. We introduce RelaxKV, which formulates selective cache repair as a joint allocation problem over repair targets and recomputation context. Guided by the user query, RelaxKV identifies layer-specific repair targets and restricts their recomputation to a query-relevant context, reducing attention computation. Across four decoder models, RelaxKV at a 15% anchor ratio improves aggregate LongBench performance over ProphetKV on all models. On Qwen3-14B, RelaxKV provides a stronger quality-TTFT trade-off than ProphetKV across a 5%-30% anchor-ratio sweep, and achieves the best selective results on RULER-MV and LV-Eval at 16K and 32K context lengths. Controlled ablations further demonstrate the importance of recomputation context selection.

A core bottleneck in large language model (LLM) inference is the cost of attending over the ever-growing key-value (KV) cache. Although near-oracle top-k KV selection can preserve the quality of dense attention while sharply reducing computation and bandwidth, existing sparse methods generally rely on posterior heuristics, i.e., selectors conditioned on observed attention or proxy scores. Such conditioning introduces posterior bias: it tends to distort true token importance and miss salient tokens, thereby impairing long-range reasoning. To tackle this problem, we propose Pre-hoc Sparsity (PrHS), which selects KV entries before attention scoring and provides explicit accuracy control. Let the attention mass of discarded entries be delta (the dropped mass). Through a marginal-to-mutual-information analysis, we derive an upper bound on the mutual-information loss that depends only on the dropped mass. This relation explains failure modes of posterior heuristics and enables verifiable guarantees by controlling the dropped mass in advance. Within PrHS, we instantiate three orthogonal pre-hoc selectors along the axes of time, depth, and layer. Extensive experiments on LLaMA and Mistral families validate PrHS. Across GSM8K and CoQA, PrHS reduces retrieval overhead by over 90%, achieving 3x higher retrieval sparsity than HShare at matched or better accuracy. It incurs under 1% average degradation on LongBench, lowers attention FLOPs by about 15% versus prior sparse baselines, and yields a 9.9x speedup in attention-operator latency and 2.8x higher throughput on NVIDIA A100-80GB GPUs than the dense baseline.

A long-lived KV cache must be compressed before the queries that will read it exist. Selection by observed attention collapses there: on a NoPE-MLA model, H2O and SnapKV retrieve 0.00 and 0.33 of needles at 8x compression, because a token's importance has not yet been observed. VestigeKV instead derives a sparse attention pattern from a signal the cache already carries, occupying the sparse-attention literature's one unoccupied quadrant: training-free and query-independent. In NoPE-MLA the 64-dimensional decoupled branch is a vestige of RoPE that training repurposes into a salience channel; reading 11% of each row, it partitions the cache into an attended tier and a GPU-resident archive that no row ever leaves, reachable each step by a certified, query-adaptive trigger. Nothing is trained and cache rows are never quantized, so every quality effect attributes to selection and scheduling. On Kimi Linear 48B, retrieval holds at 1.00 under 8x and 0.96 under 32x from 8k to 65k context, with zero gap to full-row selection, and the recall tier holds 128x at 1.00 (8k). Both tiers stay on the GPU, so the win is speed, not memory: the per-step scan reads ~26% of the bytes dense attention would, and on a two-node sglang deployment the crossover sits at ~40k context, reaching 1.18x at 256k and 1.39x at 496k. The mechanism is exclusive to NoPE: the identical operator on a RoPE MLA collapses to 0.08, query-independent salience exists only without rotation, and query-universal exact merging is provably impossible under RoPE. All thresholds were frozen before their data; 20 archived verdicts and 8 closed routes accompany the paper.