Large audio language models (LALMs) have made substantial progress in audio understanding. However, autoregressive text generation introduces computational overhead and latency in high-throughput applications that require frequent selection, judgment, and scoring. To address this limitation, we introduce Qwen-Audio-Jev, which augments Qwen-Audio-3.1-ASR-Flash-Next with a dedicated Jev decision head. The model unifies selection, binary judgment, and scoring through three decision primitives: CHOICE, NOUL, and SCORE. Given an audio input, a natural-language question, and an explicit answer specification, Qwen-Audio-Jev directly outputs a task-conditioned probability distribution or a numerical score through typed decision readouts. Evaluation across 18 benchmarks demonstrates the model's effectiveness: CHOICE achieves 78.40 percent accuracy on MMAU and 83.14 percent on MMSU; NOUL achieves 93.76 percent accuracy on the VoxCeleb1-O speaker verification benchmark; and SCORE achieves a normalized mean absolute error of 0.1235 on NISQA overall quality assessment. These results highlight the potential of Qwen-Audio-Jev for efficient audio decision-making in applications such as large-scale audio screening, speaker verification, and automated quality assessment.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Qwen-Audio-Jev model architecture. Audio and serialized question/criteria inputs feed the shared Qwen-Audio-3.1-ASR-Flash-Next decoder. Its final-prefix hidden state, computed before target-answer tokens, supports three typed affine readouts. Choice and Score normalize only valid candidate or level positions. The requested primitive selects the active output; the three readouts do not imply simultaneous multi-question inference.
Type
Answer space
Native output
Choice
2–64 ordered candidate descriptions
Candidate probabilities and the selected option
Noul
A binary proposition
Probability that the proposition is true
Score
2–10 ordered rating levels
Level probabilities and the expected level index
Table 1: Answer spaces and native outputs of the three decision readouts in the current implementation.
Figure 2: Training pathways of Qwen-Audio-Jev. (a) SFT compares predicted distributions with observed labels and directly backpropagates task-specific losses. (b) The optional RLCD-inspired stage initializes from SFT, samples multiple decisions, and uses label-based group rewards for reward-weighted policy-gradient updates. Choice, Noul, and Score are alternative question-conditioned tasks; only the requested primitive is active.
Benchmark
Accuracy (%) ↑
CochlScene
78.9645
NSynth
74.2432
NonSpeech7k
90.4828
DiDiSpeech
100.0000
MELD
58.1511
MMAU
78.4000
Table 2: Choice accuracy (%) of Qwen-Audio-Jev on eight labeled benchmarks covering acoustic-scene classification, musical-instrument recognition, human non-speech sound recognition, speaker-gender classification, speech emotion recognition, and audio question answering.
Configuration
Accuracy (%) ↑
EER (%) ↓
AUC ↑
Brier ↓
FPR (%) ↓
FNR (%) ↓
VoxCeleb1-O
93.7595
6.1714
0.983857
0.047376
5.6199
6.8613
Clotho-AQA
79.7802
19.0659
0.884508
0.148500
12.0101
26.5306
PodSarc
99.6877
0.3195
0.999898
0.003059
0.3195
0.3037
In-the-Wild
74.0072
22.8112
0.850632
0.167138
3.6870
63.6764
Table 3: Noul performance of Qwen-Audio-Jev on speaker verification, binary audio question answering, sarcasm detection, and audio-deepfake detection. Accuracy, FPR, and FNR use a probability threshold of 0.5.
Configuration
MOS MAE ↓
MOS RMSE ↓
Normalized MAE ↓
Normalized RMSE ↓
Pearson ↑
Spearman ↑
NISQA overall
0.493912
0.615819
0.123478
0.153955
0.779906
0.753822
NISQA noise
0.557110
0.720885
0.139278
0.180221
0.654883
0.688694
NISQA coloration
0.410769
0.514844
0.102692
0.128711
0.809775
0.820855
NISQA discontinuity
0.419045
0.511465
0.104761
0.127866
0.860221
0.825081
NISQA loudness
0.453387
0.564739
0.113347
0.141185
0.676132
0.608626
VoiceMOS
0.371024
0.466741
0.092756
0.116685
0.880209
0.872587
Table 4: Score performance of Qwen-Audio-Jev on NISQA speech-quality dimensions and VoiceMOS/BVCC synthetic speech. Error and correlation metrics summarize numerical accuracy and agreement with human quality ratings.
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China · China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing, China · Innovation and Management Center of the School of Software (Ningbo), Zhejiang University, Ningbo, China +2