cs.LGOct 15, 2026

Initiating Removal from Operational Symptoms in Federated Vehicular Networks

Authors: Zihao Ding, Jun Huang, Qiang Duan

Organizations: Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA · Information Sciences and Technology Department, Pennsylvania State University, Abington, PA 19001, USA

Abstract

Connected vehicles train a driving model through federated learning (FL) and drive with it, so a faulty contribution often surfaces only as a delayed symptom on the road. Federated unlearning (FU) assumes that a removal request names what to forget. A symptom names no vehicle or round, and aggregation has already spread its cause across the fleet. We propose Aggregation-Time Operational-evidence Neutralization of Effects (\method{}), which makes unlearning a term of the FL aggregation rule. \method{} projects everyday driving errors and reported symptoms onto a subspace spanned by recent global increments. It propagates the surviving effect of every contribution with curvature estimated from these increments and scores all contributions in one backward pass. A two-tier correction suppresses suspected effects in every round and eliminates confirmed ones after a one-round probe. We prove that backward scoring matches forward scoring and that the elimination is exact when training is flat outside the subspace. On three driving datasets, \method{} leaves 43% to 61% less residual harm than the strongest baseline in eight of nine settings while staying within 0.36 points of full retraining in utility.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Oct 27, 2026

Split Federated Unlearning

Split federated learning (SFL) combines partitioned model execution with federated aggregation to support collaborative learning across distributed Web and edge environments. However, removing learned contributions in SFL is challenging due to cross-partition coupling and historical influence propagation through dual-side aggregation. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first systematic formulation of Split Federated Unlearning (SFU), encompassing client-wise and class-wise removal, counterfactual retraining, and partition-specific update constraints. We theoretically characterize historical influence propagation and mode-dependent unlearning feasibility, revealing structural limitations of restricted model updates. As an initial solution, we propose SURE, integrating dual-importance estimation, selective parameter perturbation, and importance-guided recovery. Extensive experiments with existing unlearning methods adapted to SFL reveal substantial forgetting-utility trade-offs across model architectures, data distributions, and update modes. SURE achieves competitive agreement with mode-matched retraining at modest additional cost, while further analyses highlight the impact of split position and update constraints on unlearning behavior. These findings establish SFU as a distinct research problem and provide a foundation for unlearning in partitioned federated systems.
May 19, 2026

Do Vision Models Truly Forget? New Findings from Representation-Level Certification of Visual Unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning

Machine unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) has attracted growing interest, yet existing methods certify forgetting solely using output-level metrics. We challenge these works by introducing Mirage, a representation-level auditing framework that comprises four complementary diagnostics: Linear probe recovery (LPR), centered kernel alignment (CKA), feature separability scoring, and layer-wise recovery analysis. Extensive experiments across seven datasets and seven baseline methods following recent VFL unlearning protocols reveal three key findings: (1) Forgetting gap: methods that pass output-level certification still retain substantial class structure in their representations, with LPR exceeding the retrained baseline by up to 15.4 points; CKA shows that these models remain structurally closer to the original than to the retrained reference, while separability scores indicate persistent geometric discrimination. (2) Unlearning trilemma: no existing method simultaneously achieves high utility, output-level forgetting, and representation-level forgetting. (3) Class-sample asymmetry: class-level forgetting leaves strong representational traces (LPR exceeding 96 percent on several datasets), whereas sample-level forgetting is indistinguishable from chance (LPR is approximately 50 percent); layer-wise analysis further shows that residual class information persists across network depths. These findings call for representation-aware evaluation standards in federated unlearning research. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/YuZhenyuLindy/Mirage.
May 23, 2026

Rethinking Federated Unlearning via the Lens of Memorization

Federated learning (FL) increasingly needs machine unlearning to comply with privacy regulations. However, existing federated unlearning approaches may overlook the overlapping information between the unlearning and remaining data, leading to ineffective unlearning and unfairness between clients. In this work, we revisit federated unlearning through the lens of memorization. We argue that unlearning should mainly remove the unique memorized information attributable to the data to be forgotten, while preserving overlapping patterns that are also supported by the remaining data. Specifically, we propose Grouped Memorization Evaluation, an example-level metric that separates memorized knowledge from overlapping knowledge. Building on this metric, we introduce Federated Memorization Pruning (FedMemPrune), a pruning-based unlearning approach that resets redundant parameters responsible for memorization. Extensive experiments show that FedMemPrune closely matches retraining-based unlearning baselines while more effectively eliminating memorization than existing federated unlearning algorithms, yielding strong unlearning performance without sacrificing the utility of retained knowledge.