cs.CLOct 15, 2026

ToMStories: Interpreting Theory-of-Mind in Synthetic Narratives

Authors: Melanie Subbiah, Chia-En Jacklyn Tsai, Kathleen McKeown

Organizations: Columbia University

Abstract

Understanding people often requires inferring what they feel or want from how they behave rather than from what they state outright. We ask whether language models can make these inferences, and how they do so. We introduce Theory-of-Mind Stories (ToMStories), an evaluation dataset of ~6,000 short synthetically generated narrative vignettes, each paired with a multiple-choice or open-ended question about a character's emotion, fear, motivation, or emotional wound. These psychological states are conveyed implicitly (showing), explicitly (telling), or with conflict between dialogue and description. Evaluating thirteen open-weight models (1B-72B parameters), we find that the largest models match humans on multiple choice but not open-ended questions. Our analyses point to simplifications models make in both interpretation and generation of implicit psychological states, indicating that synthetic data can help us understand how models perform interpretation, but likely overestimates how well models interpret humans.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables9 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. DialToM: A Theory of Mind Benchmark for Forecasting State-Driven Dialogue Trajectories

    Apr 22, 2026Neemesh Yadav, Palakorn Achananuparp, Jing Jiang +1LLM EvaluationTheory of Mind

  2. PICTURE: Enhancing Theory-of-Mind in Large Language Models by Revealing, Not Hiding, Characters' Lack of Knowledge

    Aug 3, 2026Eojin Jeon, SangKeun LeeTheory of MindLLM Prompting

  3. OmniToM: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in LLMs via Explicit Belief Modeling

    May 25, 2026Adam Bawatneh, Sagar Sapkota, Amrit Singh Bedi +2LLM EvaluationTheory of Mind