MUB: An Identity-Masked Benchmark for Music Understanding in Multimodal Language Models
Abstract
Evaluating musical perception in multimodal language models requires separating audio evidence from answers recoverable through metadata or external tools. We present the Music Understanding Benchmark (MUB), a locally assembled collection of 500 identity-masked recordings with existing annotations for tempo, key, time signature, and structural intervals. The collection covers all 24 major/minor key combinations, tempos of 47--180 beats per minute, and 4,676 annotated intervals. Original titles, artists, and platform identifiers are excluded from evaluation inputs. Relative to recent music question-answering and temporal-grounding work, MUB emphasizes scalar tempo prediction and full-recording interval outputs, together with a documented metadata-masking protocol. Saved baseline predictions yield 53.6% tempo accuracy for a simple DSP estimator and 98.4% time-signature accuracy for a constant 4/4 predictor. We identify important limitations, including an asymmetric legacy key metric, unverified independent annotation agreement, extreme metre imbalance, and unresolved recording-level rights clearance. No contemporary multimodal language model comparison has yet been completed. MUB is therefore an evaluation resource and protocol under validation, rather than a completed demonstration of model capabilities.
Figures & tables
| Work | Year | Evaluation or modelling emphasis |
|---|---|---|
| MuChoMusic | 2024 | Human-validated music multiple-choice questions. |
| GPT as a judge | 2025 | Annotation judgement with symbolic representations. |
| Audio Flamingo 3 | 2025 | General audio-language modelling and long audio. |
| Music Flamingo | 2025 | Specialized music audio-language modelling. |
| HumMusQA | 2026 | Expert-written musical reasoning questions. |
| GaMMA | 2026 | Global/temporal questions and segmentation evaluation. |
| Field | Evaluator records | Model request |
|---|---|---|
| Original title and artist | Removed | Excluded |
| Original platform song/task IDs | Removed | Excluded |
| Account and operator names | Removed | Excluded |
| Opaque MUB identifier | Retained | Routing only |
| Partial-file fingerprint | Retained | Must be excluded |
| Gold labels | Retained | Excluded |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Recordings | 500 |
| BPM range | 47–180 |
| BPM: 25th percentile / median / 75th percentile | 75 / 101 / 128 |
| BPM below 70 / 70–99 / 100–129 / at least 130 | 87 / 156 / 150 / 107 |
| Major / minor | 268 / 232 |
| Key/mode combinations | 24 |
| Measure | DSP | Constant prior |
|---|---|---|
| BPM hit rate ( 4%) | 53.6% | 9.0% |
| BPM median relative error | 2.9% | 22.3% |
| Legacy key score (defective rule) | 25.4% | 9.2% |
| Time-signature accuracy | 36.6% | 98.4% |
| Mean interval F1 (no intervals predicted) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Audio-Language Model Evaluation
Audio-language model evaluation tests whether systems understand speech, music, and environmental sound reliably, fairly, and with evidence grounded in audio.
See all 206 papers