cs.ROOct 16, 2026

ORD-WM: Learning Object-Centric Rigid Dynamics for 3D World Modeling in Robotic Manipulation

Authors: Yueyang Weng, Xiaopeng Zhang, Yuxi Ou, Yongjin Mu, Chengzhi Zhao, Yanjie Li

Organizations: Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen

Abstract

World models provide robots with a predictive mechanism for reasoning about how actions change object states in manipulation tasks. However, existing image-based and dense 3D world models do not explicitly impose object-level rigid motion, leaving rigid-object geometry preservation to be learned implicitly and making multi-step rollouts susceptible to shape drift or object-level motion inconsistency. To address this, we propose ORD-WM, a 3D world model that learns object-centric rigid dynamics for robotic manipulation. ORD-WM learns a vector-neuron variational autoencoder supervised by signed distance fields, which encodes each object point cloud as a geometry-aware latent representation composed of 3D vector features, and uses an action-conditioned dynamics model to predict object-wise SE(3) motion increments. Rather than generating unconstrained next latent states, ORD-WM analytically applies predicted object-wise rigid transformations to the current latent states, separating persistent object geometry from pose changes. Experiments show that ORD-WM enables stable, geometry-preserving multi-step prediction and supports efficient real-time replanning for closed-loop model predictive control in simulated and real-world manipulation scenarios.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables17 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Jun 30, 2026

3D Point World Models: Point Completion Enables More Accurate Dynamics Learning

Learning predictive models of the world enables robotic control through planning, potentially allowing robots to improvise solutions on new tasks. However, large video-based dynamics models lack explicit 3D spatial structure and suffer from geometrically inconsistent long-term rollouts with compounding errors. Emerging 3D dynamics models based on partial point clouds improve geometric consistency but remain sensitive to occlusions and accumulated prediction drift. To address these challenges, we present 3D Point World Models (3DPWM) - a task-agnostic world model that operates entirely in 3D space by first completing partial point clouds and then learning action-conditioned dynamics in this completed 3D scene. By operating on completed geometry, 3DPWM enables reliable long-horizon rollouts and more accurate cost evaluation for model-based planning while supporting adaptation to new tasks. Experiments across different robotic embodiments and tabletop manipulation benchmarks demonstrate that 3DPWM achieves significantly more reliable long-horizon rollouts (100-300+ steps), supports both open-loop and closed-loop planning, and enables successful sim-to-real transfer.
Oct 2, 2026

PointWAM: 3D World Action Modeling for Dexterous Robotic Manipulation

World action models jointly learn to forecast world dynamics and predict robot actions, such that the learned internal world dynamics guide accurate actions. Existing approaches typically represent the world as RGB frames or latent counterparts while predicting actions as end-effector poses or joint angles, but they often struggle to capture the 3D spatial structure and contact geometry central to dexterous manipulation. We introduce Point World Action Model (PointWAM), a 3D world action model that decomposes the world into a scene (i.e., environment) and hands (i.e., actor), and jointly forecasts both as 3D point trajectories within a shared space-time coordinate frame. This explicit, disentangled representation enables effective pre-training on large-scale human demonstration videos without requiring any task-specific object or keypoint selection. Given a colored point cloud and a language instruction, PointWAM predicts how the scene and hands co-evolve in 3D space over time, then retargets the forecast hand motion to robot actions. Pre-training on human videos improves average DexJoCo success by 56.9 percentage points, and scene-trajectory supervision adds 10.9 points over forecasting the hands alone. With both, PointWAM surpasses the prior state of the art on ten DexJoCo tasks by 11.7 points and outperforms strong VLAs on a real robot.
May 27, 2026

World Models for Robotic Manipulation: A Survey

Robotic manipulation depends on the ability to anticipate how actions reshape objects, contacts, and scene geometry before execution. Learned world models provide this capability by predicting task-relevant future evolution under robot intervention, yet the term now spans latent dynamics models, action-conditioned video generators, three- and four-dimensional scene predictors, physics-informed simulators, and predictive modules inside vision-language-action systems. This breadth has fragmented the literature and obscured the design choices that matter for manipulation. We survey world models for robotic manipulation through three questions: what future representation is predicted, how prediction is connected to action, and when prediction is used in the robot-learning pipeline. We operationally define a world model as an action-conditioned predictive system and distinguish it from perception modules, inverse models, policies, rewards, and value functions. We then organize existing work into five representation families, develop a functional taxonomy that separates integrated prediction-action models from explicit predictive planners, and characterize infrastructure roles including synthetic experience generation, candidate filtering, search-based evaluation, learned environments, and outcome verification. We further map these roles across pretraining, post-training, and inference adaptation, review 34 manipulation datasets, and synthesize evaluation protocols for predictive fidelity, task performance, and simulator reliability. This survey shows that world models are evolving from task-specific dynamics predictors into predictive infrastructure for robot learning, while exposing open challenges in contact modeling, hallucination control, action alignment, and benchmarking under closed-loop use.