Do Speech BCIs Need Larger Models? Rethinking Neural Decoding beyond Scaling
Organizations: Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Nanyang Technological University · Zhejiang University
Abstract
Recent speech brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) increasingly rely on large models and complex multi-stage pipelines for neural decoding. However, in speech BCI, where training data are scarce, noisy, and expensive to collect, the benefits of model scaling remain unclear. This work revisits a fundamental question: are large models truly necessary for accurate neural decoding? We propose BEST (Brain-Encoding-Speech-Text), a two-stage framework for efficient neural-to-text decoding. Instead of relying on large generative models or phoneme-centric pipelines, BEST introduces hierarchical intermediate representations and a compact speech-oriented decoder that directly maps neural activity to text. This design preserves essential structure while significantly reducing computational cost, enabling robust generalization in low-resource settings and practical deployment under constrained resources. On the Brain-to-Text '24 and '25 benchmarks, BEST achieves word error rates (WERs) of 6.19% and 1.62%, respectively, using only 3.85% of the parameters required by comparable methods. Beyond these results, we provide three key insights: (1) decoder scaling yields non-monotonic gains; (2) cross-modal alignment is more critical than model size; and (3) overfitting degards sequence-level performance. Representation analysis further reveals a consistent neural-audio-text alignment pathway.
Figures & tables
| Model | #Param, RAM | Brain-to-text ’24 T12 | Brain-to-text ’25 T15 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PER | CER | Valid WER | WER | PER | CER | Valid WER | WER | ||
| RNN(Baseline) [ 48 ] | 5.70B, 300GiB | 0.2122 | 0.2561 | 0.2271 | 0.0976 | 0.1310 | 0.2075 | 0.1127 | 0.0667 |
| Transformer [ 11 ] | 14.79B, 320GiB | 0.1628 | 0.1732 | 0.1121 | 0.0818 | 0.1081 | 0.1573 | 0.0934 | 0.0612 |
| DCoND [ 23 ] | 10.50B, 320GiB | 0.1534 | - | - | 0.0860 | - | - | - | - |
| BIT [ 58 ] | 1.53B, 32GiB | 0.1439 | - | 0.1607 | 0.1567 | 0.0712 | - | 0.0879 | 0.1106 |
| BIT [ 58 ] | 1.53B, 350GiB | - | - | - | 0.0635 | - | - | - | 0.0406 |
| Decoder | #Params | Dimension | Valid WER | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full fine-tuning | Partial fine-tuning | Frozen | |||
| Whisper-tiny [ 39 ] | 34M | 384 | 0.3678 | 0.2845 | 0.2996 |
| Whisper-base [ 39 ] | 74M | 512 | 0.2409 | 0.2183 | 0.2235 |
| DistilGPT2 [ 41 ] | 82M | 768 | 0.2091 | 0.1930 | 0.2006 |
| Whisper-large [ 39 ] | 1.55B | 1280 | 0.1461 | 0.1460 | 0.1572 |
| Whisper-medium [ 39 ] | 769M | 1024 | 0.1351 | 0.1309 | 0.1366 |
| Neural encoder | Whisper-small | Audio-LLM | Decoder gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEST encoder | 0.0681 | 0.0989 | 0.0308 |
| Transformer encoder | 0.0862 | 0.1217 | 0.0355 |
| GRU encoder | 0.1054 | 0.1462 | 0.0408 |
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Hyperparameter | Value |
|---|---|
| GRU Layers / Units | 5 / 768 |
| GRU Dropout | 0.4 |
| Patch Size / Stride | 14 / 4 |
| Input Dropout | 0.2 |
| Optimizer | Adam ( =0.9, =0.999) |
| Weight Decay |
Neural Decoding
Neural decoding maps brain activity or error-correction syndromes to stimuli, behavior, language, or corrective actions.
See all 179 papers