QD-Rec: Open-Ended Evolution of Recommendations via Quality-Diversity

Search and recommendation serve a shared discovery objective but encode intent differently. We study this boundary through Dear Algo on Threads, a deployed product where open-ended requests such as more NBA news or less politics steer subsequent feed recommendations rather than return a one-shot result list. Its agentic intent layer compiles explicit, inferred, negative, and compound intent into a grounded executable plan, then invokes conventional retrieval and optional semantic or multimodal reranking. The layer shares an intent-to-retrieval contract without requiring one model or serving path across search-like and recommendation-like modes. We evaluate Dear Algo under a precision-first objective. In a blinded audit of 300 public request-item pairs (296 evaluable), a strict categorical LLM-as-a-judge gate achieved 94.4% exact-Relevant precision [88.8%, 98.9%]. Across 72 normalized request clusters, the full configuration produced 7.73 judge-qualified candidates per 20 slots versus 6.61 for an LLM-derived-query baseline, a gain of 1.11 [0.12, 2.12]. In a candidate-randomized serving-path study restricted to the reranker path's first 72 eligible hours, the user-weighted judge-Irrelevant share among judged admissions was 2.80% versus 4.78% off (-1.97 points [-3.02, -0.94]), while Exact-Relevant share was 2.24 points higher [0.08, 4.41]. Together, these studies show how explicit natural-language intent can be carried into feed recommendation under a precision-first evaluation framework

Decision models, such as the commercial Jev, are language models that return one probability for each option of a question instead of generating text. We present Decision4Rec, an open and modular framework that makes decision models useful for recommendation. A knowledge graph writes the logs of each recommendation scenario as short statements on a defined scale, such as "sold: top 10%". A pool of agents, proposes candidates, and a residual ranker keeps the best 30. A decision model, trained once on real choices of three scenarios, reads them through one interface of typed questions, and a fusion step combines its answers with the score of the ranker. Any model with this interface can be used, and we run the commercial Jev, the released open Kev and Kev models trained by us on recommendation requests. The framework with a trained 4B decision model is 25 to 36% above the best trained baseline in NDCG@10 in three sparse Amazon catalogues, one of them never used to train the decision model, and almost tie with baselines on the dense Steam dataset. Most of the gain comes from the pool, and with a trained recommender it comes from what the agents know about its candidates rather than from new candidates. The 27B decision model adds to the pool 5 to 6% above the 0.8B model in three of four domains. A trained 0.8B open model beats the released Jev in eleven of fifteen settings and is never worse. On MovieLens-1M, a dense domain never seen in training, the gain is 5 to 7%. Code, configurations and trained models are available at https://github.com/marcopoli/decision4rec and https://huggingface.co/m-polignano.

Large language models can improve recommendation quality by reasoning explicitly over user history and candidate items - for example, extracting a user's preferences or explaining why one item fits better than another - rather than mapping history directly to a ranked list. This reasoning, however, is expensive to repeat on every ranking request and, once produced, is typically consumed once and discarded, leaving it neither reusable across future requests nor easy to inspect or correct as user tastes drift. Our insight is that reasoning does not need to be regenerated at every call if it can instead be compressed once into a compact, structured memory that a lightweight model retrieves from. We propose rEDMRec, which distills a teacher LLM's reasoning into four typed, editable experience channels - long-term preference, short-term context, item-perception, and counterfactual hard-negative comparisons - maintained by an LLM memory controller that performs Add/Delete/Modify/Keep operations and refines entries via K-agent debate. A lightweight student LLM then ranks candidates purely by retrieving from this memory, without invoking the teacher again, decoupling online inference cost from reasoning depth. Across ML-1M, Amazon Beauty, and Steam and ten student backbones, rEDMRec improves HR@1 over zero-shot, few-shot, and RAG on every backbone, and over GraphRAG on most backbones, with Impv up to 13.3% vs. the second-best baseline on ML-1M. Channel ablations show that short-term context is the only channel that helps consistently across capacity tiers, whereas long-term, item-perception, and counterfactual contributions are capacity-dependent (and can reverse on the strongest students); debate-based memory optimization lowers bank duplication by 7.4 percentage points while raising downstream HR@1 by up to +0.029 over six optimization epochs.