cs.LGOct 18, 2026

Steered Not Stirred: Effective Reward Tilting using Surrogate Reward Mixing

Authors: Alec Sargood, Olivia Gallup, Georg Maierhofer, Noam Ghenassia, Paul Duckworth, Krisztina Sinkovics, Avishek Joey Bose

Organizations: InstaDeep · University College London · University of Oxford · University of Cambridge · 

Abstract

Continuous-time generative models, from diffusion models, flow matching, and now flow maps, owe their practical value to high-fidelity generation and steerability. In many applications, a ground-truth latent ``oracle'' reward R∗R^* is unavailable or expensive to evaluate, e.g., human judgments or experimental measurements. Although the oracle reward is not directly observable, it can often be approximated through multiple cheaper surrogates that, individually, provide incomplete characterizations but collectively reveal substantial information about the downstream task. In this paper, we present a method for composing such surrogates to steer a pretrained model toward the distribution tilted by an unavailable R∗R^*. Given a small feedback set of oracle rankings or numerical rewards, we introduce Mixing And Reward Tilting for INference-time Improvement (MARTINI), which learns a surrogate composition for plug-and-play use with standard inference-time steering methods. Our theory characterizes surrogate information limits and relates population recovery error to ideal-target KL at small tilt strength. For preferences, the bound additionally accounts for an irreducible mismatch between the Plackett-Luce population target and the conditional mean. Experiments demonstrate improved oracle-tilt fidelity in language generation and ImageNet alignment, and improved joint pose accuracy and validity in protein-ligand cofolding, without inference-time oracle queries.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables31 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

May 16, 2026

TILT: Model-Intrinsic Reward Alignment For Compositional Diffusion

Consider conditional generation p(x∣C={c1,c2,…ck})p(x \mid C=\{c_1, c_2, \dots c_k\}) where CC is a prompt composed of multiple concepts cic_i. Diffusion models often struggle with compositional prompts, producing samples in which some concepts dominate while others are missing or weakly represented. Prior work attributes these failures to mode collision, where single-concept modes of p(x∣ci)p(x\mid c_i) overlap with modes of the joint p(x∣C)p(x \mid C). To seek out collision-free modes of p(x∣C)p(x \mid C), or "pure modes", corrector-based approaches have attempted to suppress collisions at intermediate diffusion times. However, local corrections are often heuristic and do not necessarily steer the generation to a "pure mode" in the final data space. Derived from a principled formulation, we present TILT (Test-time model-Intrinsic reward aLignment via Tilting), a training-free framework that poses eventual pure mode sampling as a reward for intermediate-time alignment. This reward offers valuable advantages: (1) it is intrinsic to the model, hence external reward models need not be trained by modality-specific datasets, (2) it yields a closed-form target under a variational approximation, which makes it realizable through standard diffusion sampling, and (3) it is interpretable, hence amenable to preference-based modifications. Project page: https://debottam-dutta7.github.io/tilt_web/
Sep 30, 2026

Fenchel Tilting: Weighted Correction for Efficient Finetuning of Generative Models

Adapting a pretrained generative model to an arbitrary preference expressed as a utility function underlies reward alignment, guided design, and constraint satisfaction, enabling diverse applications. Existing fine-tuning methods trade off generality against computational cost: they either restrict the family class of supported preferences to keep optimization simple or preserve generality at the expense of efficiency. We introduce Fenchel Tilt Flow Control (FTFC), which decouples utility optimization from generative-model fitting. FTFC first optimizes for a target distribution by jointly fitting an effective reward and density-ratio weights on pretrained samples. Method combines the utility's variational structure with Fenchel duality, supporting general ff-divergence penalties that determine how rewards are transformed into an distribution-correction weights. These weights are then frozen and used to modify a diffusion or flow model in a single stage of importance-weighted denoising or flow matching, without differentiating through sampling trajectories. We establish exact duality for concave utilities under suitable conditions and show that weighted fitting reproduces the optimal target distribution for a given utility. Across image and molecule generation benchmarks, FTFC improves over baselines on diverse preference functions, while also being up to 20×20\times more efficient. roposed method enables adaptation beyond expected-reward maximization without complex optimization, while preserving robustness for more general class of the utility functions compared to baselines.
Jun 1, 2026

Are we really tilting? The mechanics of reward guidance in flow and diffusion models

Reward guidance algorithms steer a learned generative process toward the reward-tilted measure at inference time. While empirically powerful, these methods are prone to reward hacking: the guided model over-optimizes the reward at the cost of fidelity to the learned distribution. Prior work has attributed this to the complexity of neural reward functions or implicit biases in diffusion training, but its fundamental origins remain poorly understood. We show that reward hacking arises from an approximation made in most practical implementations of reward-guided diffusion -- finite-particle plug-in estimation of the Doob h-function -- even in the simplest non-trivial settings of Gaussian and Gaussian mixture targets with quadratic rewards. In closed form, we isolate two distinct failure modes of the plug-in estimator: it leads to reward hacking within each mode and it cannot select high-reward modes. We propose a closed-form reward damping schedule that corrects the within-mode bias with no additional compute, and clarify the role of best-of-n sampling in compensating for the mode selection failure. Experiments on Gaussian mixture targets, a 2D checkerboard, and FLUX.1 text-to-image generation confirm that our theoretical insights carry over to practical settings.