Reinforcement learning on the EPRI AI-ccelerating Unit Commitment benchmark: diagnosing over-commitment and guiding MILP with learned policies

Maintaining instantaneous balance between electricity supply and demand is critical for reliability and grid instability. System operators achieve this through solving the task of Unit Commitment (UC),ca high dimensional large-scale Mixed-integer Linear Programming (MILP) problem that is strictly and heavily governed by the grid physical constraints. As grid integrate variable renewable sources, and new technologies such as long duration storage in the grid, UC must be optimally solved for multi-day horizons and potentially with greater frequency. Therefore, traditional MILP solvers increasingly struggle to compute solutions within these tightening operational time limits. To bypass these computational bottlenecks, this paper proposes a novel framework utilizing a transformer-based architecture to predict generator commitment schedules over a 72-hour horizon. Also, because raw predictions in highly dimensional spaces often yield physically infeasible results, the pipeline integrates the self-attention network with deterministic post-processing heuristics that systematically enforce minimum up/down times and minimize excess capacity. Finally, these refined predictions are utilized as a warm start for a downstream MILP solver, while employing a confidence-based variable fixation strategy to drastically reduce the combinatorial search space. Validated on a single-bus test system, the complete multi-stage pipeline achieves 100% feasibility and significantly accelerates computation times. Notably, in approximately 20% of test instances, the proposed model reached a feasible operational schedule with a lower overall system cost than relying solely on the solver.

The growing number of individual generating units, hybrid resources, and security constraints has significantly increased the computational burden of network-constrained unit commitment (UC), where most solution time is spent exploring branch-and-bound trees over unit-hour binary variables. To reduce this combinatorial burden, recent approaches have explored learning-based guidance to assist commitment decisions. However, directly using tools such as large language models (LLMs) to predict full commitment schedules is unreliable, as infeasible or inconsistent binary decisions can violate inter-temporal constraints and degrade economic optimality. This paper proposes a solver-compatible dimensionality reduction framework for UC that exploits structural regularities in commitment decisions. Instead of generating complete schedules, the framework identifies a sparse subset of structurally stable commitment binaries to fix prior to optimization. One implementation uses an LLM to select these variables. The LLM does not replace the optimization process but provides partial variable restriction, while all constraints and remaining decisions are handled by the original MILP solver, which continues to enforce network, ramping, reserve, and security constraints. We formally show that the masked problem defines a reduced feasible region of the original UC model, thereby preserving feasibility and enabling solver-certified optimality within the restricted space. Experiments on IEEE 57-bus, RTS 73-bus, IEEE 118-bus, and augmented large-scale cases, including security-constrained variants, demonstrate consistent reductions in branch-and-bound nodes and solution time, achieving order-of-magnitude speedups on high-complexity instances while maintaining near-optimal objective values.

The Newton-Raphson (NR) method is widely used for solving power flow (PF) equations due to its quadratic convergence. However, its performance deteriorates under poor initialization or extreme operating scenarios, e.g., high levels of renewable energy penetration. We propose the use of reinforcement learning (RL) to optimize the initialization of NR, and introduce a quantum-enhanced RL environment update mechanism that addresses the combinatorially large action space at each RL timestep by formulating the voltage adjustment task as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem, solved with an Ising machine. RL initialization is benchmarked against flat start and start from the DC (linearized) PF solution on a standard 4-bus system, Iwamoto's ill-conditioned 11-bus system, and the IEEE 118-bus system under normal and stressed loading and reactive power limits, with verified operational solutions. On all systems, a supervised initializer refined by RL requires fewer NR iterations than flat and DC starts and than the same initializer without RL, for all seeds. For example, on the 118-bus system under normal and stressed loading, it reached 2.04 and 2.86 NR iterations, compared with 3.02 and 5.13 from DC start and 2.61 and 3.09 without RL. In wall-clock time, this pays off only for an initializer integrated into the solver and reused for many solves on a fixed topology. On the 4-bus system, a quantum-enhanced RL agent with a quantum-inspired annealer moved challenging initial states that required 29 and 44 NR iterations to initializations that required three NR iterations within one RL timestep.