Referring Expression Comprehension (REC) localizes the image region described by a natural language expression, underpinning applications such as autonomous navigation, human-robot interaction, and medical image analysis. Under weak supervision, REC is challenged by the visual-linguistic semantic gap and the difficulty of inferring region-text correspondences from coarse image-level signals alone. Moreover, no single visual encoder captures all complementary properties---semantic alignment, fine-grained texture, and boundary awareness---while naively fusing multiple pretrained encoders yields heterogeneous, hard-to-reconcile representations. We propose LaMER, a weakly supervised REC framework that dynamically aggregates four frozen expert encoders through a language-conditioned Cross-Modal Routing Fusion module, adapting expert selection to each referring expression without instance-level bounding-box supervision. A Cell-Text Matching Head with Negative Anchor Augmentation, trained with a multi-objective loss combining contrastive, reconstruction, alignment, and load-balancing terms, further stabilizes optimization. LaMER achieves 77.67%, 62.81%, and 69.49% Acc@IoU≥0.5 on RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, and RefCOCOg, surpassing DViN and WeakMCN by up to 16.49 and 14.49 points, with ablations validating each component.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overall architecture of the proposed LaMER framework.
Dataset
Images
Objects
Expressions
Train / Val / Test
RefCOCO
19,994
50,000
142,210
120.6k / 10.8k / 10.7k
RefCOCO+
19,992
49,856
141,564
120.1k / 10.7k / 10.6k
RefCOCOg
25,799
49,822
95,010
80.5k / 4.8k / 9.6k
Table 1: Statistics of the benchmark datasets.
RefCOCO
RefCOCO+
RefCOCOg
Method
val
testA
testB
val
testA
testB
val
GT Proposals
VC ( Niu et al., 2018 )
–
33.3
30.1
–
34.6
–
30.3
ARN ( Liu et al., 2019a )
38.1
36.4
36.5
34.5
36.4
–
39.6
KPRN ( Liu et al., 2019b )
36.3
35.3
37.7
37.2
36.1
–
38.4
DTWREG ( Sun et al., 2021 )
39.2
41.1
37.7
39.2
40.0
–
43.2
Table 2: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on REC datasets.
RefCOCO
RefCOCO+
Method
val
testA
testB
val
testA
testB
YOLO11x + 4 Experts
74.1
74.2
72.9
56.2
61.3
50.9
+ Cross-Attn Router
76.6
77.9
73.6
60.8
65.9
55.4
+ MultiScale Fusion
77.5
78.3
74.2
60.2
65.5
53.8
+ Bottleneck Proj.
77.6
78.7
75.4
62.3
67.6
56.2
+ Unfreeze C2PSA
77.7
79.1
75.9
62.8
67.9
57.0
Table 3: Cumulative ablation study of LaMER.
Figure 2: Same image, different queries. Blue: LaMER prediction; green dashed: annotated target. Panels (a)–(d) are from a ReferItGame test image and (e)–(h) from a RefCOCO testA image. The queries in (a)–(c) and (e)–(h) lead LaMER to seven different people; in (d) the target is among the candidate boxes, but LaMER returns the box of (a).
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Component
Specification
Operating System
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
CPU
AMD EPYC 9654 (96 cores)
System Memory
256 GB
GPU
2 × RTX 5090 (32 GB GDDR7)
CUDA Version
13.0
DL Framework
PyTorch 2.11.0
Appendix
Table 4: Experimental environment configuration.
RefCOCO
RefCOCO+
Expert Encoder
val
testA
testB
val
testA
testB
YOLO11x (Base)
67.2
65.4
70.9
38.1
37.7
39.4
CLIP
37.5
44.1
30.2
36.6
41.8
27.0
SigLIP-ViT
49.3
55.7
46.2
39.7
46.6
31.4
DINOv2 ViT-B
59.1
59.5
56.3
40.5
48.0
34.1
DINOv2 ViT-L
60.3
61.6
59.6
42.5
49.0
35.8
Appendix
Table 5: Comparison of different mixtures of visual features on RefCOCO and RefCOCO+.
RefCOCO
RefCOCO+
Top- N
val
testA
testB
val
testA
testB
Top-1
38.1
38.6
38.3
29.2
29.2
26.6
Top-2
75.5
76.4
74.0
59.3
64.9
53.2
Top-3
77.1
78.8
75.5
61.0
67.5
55.1
Top-4
77.7
79.1
75.9
62.8
67.9
57.0
Appendix
Table 6: Ablation of the number of visual experts.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
IoU
0.72
0.82
0.90
0.00
0.97
0.87
0.83
0.90
SigLIP
0.29
0.31
0.27
0.30
0.28
0.26
0.27
0.26
DINOv2
0.17
0.10
0.29
0.15
0.18
0.14
0.25
0.14
EfficientSAM
0.49
0.53
0.31
0.50
0.50
0.58
0.44
0.57
ConvNeXt
0.05
0.06
0.12
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.03
Appendix
Table 7: IoU with the annotated target and router weights over the four experts, for panels (a)–(h) of Figure 2 .
State Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Hybrid Augmented Intelligence, Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Xi’an Jiaotong University · Xingchen AGI Lab, China Telecom Artificial Intelligence Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. · Beijing Normal University +4