Progressive Subset Selection and Cascaded Consistency for Unsupervised Vision-Language Model Adaptation
Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada
Abstract
Pretrained Vision-Language Models (PVLMs) achieve strong zero-shot recognition but often suffer performance degradation under target-domain shift. Unsupervised adaptation provides a practical way to improve target-domain performance without labeled data, but it remains challenging because pseudo-labels generated by the model can be unreliable and no labeled validation set is available for model selection or early stopping. We propose a simple framework for unsupervised PVLM adaptation that combines progressive margin-based subset selection with cascaded consistency learning. The subset selection strategy constructs a class-balanced pseudo-labeled set using prediction margins and gradually expands it during training, enabling adaptation to start from reliable supervision anchors before incorporating broader target-domain data. Cascaded consistency learning further exploits unlabeled samples by using temporally smoothed teacher predictions on weakly augmented views to supervise student predictions on strongly augmented views, with confidence filtering to reduce the influence of uncertain pseudo-labels. To preserve the pretrained embedding structure, the framework updates only normalization parameters in the visual encoder and class prototypes initialized from text prompts. Experiments across multiple recognition benchmarks with both CLIP and SigLIP backbones show consistent improvements over zero-shot baselines and competitive performance against recent unsupervised PVLM adaptation methods. These results suggest that progressive pseudo-label selection and teacher-guided consistency provide an effective and lightweight strategy for adapting PVLM classifiers without labeled target data.
Figures & tables
| Methods | FGVCAircraft | DTD | CIFAR100 | Food101 | OxfordPets | CIFAR10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIP ( Radford et al., 2021 ) | 18.9 | 44.4 | 62.3 | 83.3 | 87.5 | 88.3 |
| UPL ( Huang et al., 2022 ) | 17.1 | 45.4 | 67.4 | 84.3 | 83.8 | 91.3 |
| POUF ( Tanwisuth et al., 2023 ) | 19.8 | 47.0 | 68.9 | 84.0 | 89.5 | 92.5 |
| LaFTer ( Mirza et al., 2023 ) | 19.9 | 50.3 | 69.8 | 82.5 | 84.9 | 94.6 |
| DPA ( Ali et al., 2025 ) | 20.7 | 55.7 | 76.5 | 84.8 | 90.7 | 96.0 |
| Ours | 22.9 | 57.7 | 74.1 | 84.8 | 90.3 | 96.0 |
| Methods | FGVCAircraft | DTD | CIFAR100 | Food101 | OxfordPets | CIFAR10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIP ( Radford et al., 2021 ) | 24.9 | 43.9 | 66.6 | 87.7 | 89.0 | 90.1 |
| UPL ( Huang et al., 2022 ) | 22.5 | 45.9 | 70.4 | – | 88.0 | 92.9 |
| POUF ( Tanwisuth et al., 2023 ) | 24.4 | 48.6 | 66.3 | – | 91.8 | 92.3 |
| LaFTer ( Mirza et al., 2023 ) | 22.4 | 54.8 | 76.3 | – | 85.3 | 96.5 |
| DPA ( Ali et al., 2025 ) | 25.1 | 50.7 | 78.1 | – | 93.2 | 96.4 |
| Ours | 26.2 | 53.4 | 76.1 | 89.3 | 93.5 | 97.2 |
| Method | FGVCAircraft | DTD | CIFAR100 | Food101 | OxfordPets | CIFAR10 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SigLIP ( Zhai et al., 2023 ) | 43.9 | 63.4 | 70.8 | 89.4 | 94.2 | 92.5 | 75.7 |
| Ours | 47.4 | 67.9 | 82.9 | 91.6 | 95.2 | 97.6 | 80.4 (+4.7) |
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Subset Schedule ( ) | Threshold ( ) | FGVCAircraft | DTD | OxfordPets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed | 21.4 | 55.8 | 89.3 | |
| Progressive | 21.3 | 57.1 | 89.4 | |
| Progressive | 21.8 | 58.4 | 89.9 | |
| Progressive | 22.9 | 57.7 | 90.3 |
VLM Adaptation
Vision-language model adaptation tailors pretrained image-text and multimodal models to new tasks and domains while retaining transferable capabilities.
See all 545 papers