Less is More: Concise Retrieval and Critic-based Re-ranking for Composed Image Retrieval
Authors: Yuqian Zheng, Hyoju Ahn, Hyeongjin Ahn, Eunil Park
Organizations: Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea · Department of Immersive Media Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea · Jaume I University, Castellon, Spain
Zero-shot composed image retrieval (ZS-CIR) aims to retrieve a target image based on a reference image and modification text. Recent approaches commonly rely on large vision-language models to generate target image captions for retrieval. However, these captions may include redundant semantic details, introducing noise when retrieving the target image and leading to suboptimal retrieval results. To address this issue, we propose Less-is-More CIR, a two-stage training-free framework that combines Concise Retrieval and Critic Re-ranking. In the first stage, concise target-oriented captions are generated that preserve only the most discriminative modification semantics, thereby reducing semantic noise in the retrieval. In the second stage, a critic re-rank module further evaluates the retrieved candidates from the perspectives of modification consistency and reference preservation. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed framework for the ZS-CIR. Our code is available at: https://github.com/dxlabskku/LM-CIR.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Comparison of target image captions generated by existing ZS-CIR methods and our concise reasoning strategy. Normal CoT introduces semantic noise, whereas concise reasoning generates cleaner target descriptions. Comparison of target image captions generated by existing ZS-CIR methods and our concise reasoning strategy. Normal CoT introduces semantic noise, whereas concise reasoning generates cleaner target descriptions.
Figure 2. Overview of the two-stage LM-CIR framework. (a) In Stage 1, an LVLM generates a concise target image caption and retrieves N candidates using fused image-image and text-image similarity scores. (b) In Stage 2, the Top-20 candidates are re-ranked based on EDIT and PRESERVE scores predicted by the LVLM critic. Overview of the two-stage LM-CIR framework. (a) In Stage 1, an LVLM generates a concise target image caption and retrieves N candidates using fused image-image and text-image similarity scores. (b) In Stage 2, the Top-20 candidates are re-ranked based on EDIT and PRESERVE scores predicted by the LVLM critic.
Benchmark
CIRCO
CIRR
Metric
mAP@ k
Recall@ k
Recall sub @ k
Backbone
Method
k =5
k =10
k =25
k =50
k =1
k =5
k =10
k =50
k =1
k =2
k =3
ViT-G/14
CIReVL ( Karthik et al., 2024 )
26.77
27.59
29.96
31.03
34.65
64.29
75.06
91.66
67.95
84.87
93.21
OSrCIR ( Tang et al., 2025 )
30.47
31.14
35.03
36.59
37.26
67.25
77.33
–
69.22
85.28
93.55
SEIZE ( Yang et al., 2024 )
32.46
33.77
36.46
37.55
38.87
69.42
79.42
–
74.15
89.23
95.71
CoTMR ( Sun et al., 2025 )
32.23
32.72
35.60
36.83
36.36
67.52
77.82
93.99
71.19
86.34
93.87
Table 1. Performance comparison on the CIRCO and CIRR test benchmarks. sub denotes the CIRR subset retrieval task. Moreover, the best and second-best results are indicated by bold and underlined text, respectively.
Backbone
Method
Shirt
Dress
Toptee
Avg.
R@10
R@50
R@10
R@50
R@10
R@50
R@10
R@50
ViT-G/14
CIReVL ( Karthik et al., 2024 )
33.71
51.42
27.07
49.53
35.80
56.14
32.19
52.36
OSrCIR ( Tang et al., 2025 )
38.65
54.71
33.02
54.78
41.04
61.83
37.57
57.11
AutoCIR ( Cheng et al., 2025 )
36.36
55.84
26.18
47.69
37.28
60.38
33.27
54.63
SEIZE ( Yang et al., 2024 )
43.60
65.42
39.61
61.02
45.94
71.12
43.05
65.85
CoTMR ( Sun et al., 2025 )
38.32
62.24
34.51
57.36
41.90
64.30
38.25
61.32
Table 2. Performance comparison on the FashionIQ validation benchmark. The best and second-best results are indicated by bold and underlined text, respectively.
Figure 3. Examples of Concise Retrieval on the CIRR and FashionIQ validation benchmarks. Retrieval results are shown from left to right according to the ranking order, where the ground-truth target images are successfully retrieved at top ranks. Examples of Concise Retrieval on the CIRR and FashionIQ validation benchmarks. Retrieval results are shown from left to right according to the ranking order, where the ground-truth target images are successfully retrieved at top ranks.
Figure 4. Example of the proposed critic-based re-ranking. The ground-truth target image, which is ranked low in the Stage-1 retrieval results, is successfully promoted to a higher rank after critic-based re-ranking. This figure shows a qualitative example of critic-based re-ranking. A reference image and modification text are used to generate the target caption. Candidate images retrieved in Stage 1 are then evaluated by an LVLM critic using EDIT and PRESERVE scores. The ground-truth candidate is promoted from rank 4 to rank 1 after re-ranking the list.
Methods
mAP@5
mAP@10
mAP@25
mAP@50
1. Critic Re-ranking Number
Top-5
32.82
33.16
35.58
36.70
Top-10
36.82
35.47
37.86
38.98
Top-20 (Full model)
39.82
39.61
40.74
41.86
2. Critic Re-ranking LVLM
Qwen2.5-32B (Full model)
39.82
39.61
40.74
41.86
Table 3. Ablation studies on the CIRCO test set using the ViT-L/14 backbone.
Methods
mAP@5
mAP@10
mAP@25
mAP@50
Concise (GPT-5.1)
25.28
26.13
28.49
29.53
Concise (Qwen3)
24.28
25.47
27.54
28.47
CIReVL
18.57
19.01
20.89
21.80
OSrCIR
23.87
25.33
27.84
28.97
AutoCIR
24.05
25.14
27.35
28.36
Table 4. Comparison of different caption generation strategies on the CIRCO test set under pure text-image retrieval.
Figure 5. Failure cases of Concise Retrieval and Critic Re-ranking. Failure cases of Concise Retrieval and Critic Re-ranking.
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) aims to retrieve target images by integrating a reference image with a corresponding modification text. CIR requires jointly considering the explicit semantics specified in the query and the implicit semantics embedded within its bi-modal composition. Recent training-free Zero-Shot CIR (ZS-CIR) methods leverage Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to generate detailed target descriptions, converting the implicit information into explicit textual expressions. However, these methods rely heavily on the textual modality and fail to capture the fuzzy retrieval nature that requires considering diverse combinations of candidates. This leads to reduced diversity and accuracy in retrieval results. To address this limitation, we propose a novel training-free method, Geodesic Mixup-based Implicit semantic eXpansion and Explicit semantic Re-ranking for ZS-CIR (G-MIXER). G-MIXER constructs composed query features that reflect the implicit semantics of reference image-text pairs through geodesic mixup over a range of mixup ratios, and builds a diverse candidate set. The generated candidates are then re-ranked using explicit semantics derived from MLLMs, improving both retrieval diversity and accuracy. Our proposed G-MIXER achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple ZS-CIR benchmarks, effectively handling both implicit and explicit semantics without additional training. Our code will be available at https://github.com/maya0395/gmixer.
Zero-shot composed image retrieval (ZS-CIR) aims to retrieve a target image from a multimodal query consisting of a reference image and an edit text describing the desired modification. Recent ZS-CIR studies have relied on projection-based methods that map a reference image into pseudo-word tokens in the text embedding space. However, such methods require additional projection and re-encoding steps, increasing training complexity, reducing efficiency, and introducing a discrepancy between training and inference. In this paper, we propose DiCE-CIR, a direct composition learning method that predicts composed query representations by directly composing a reference image and an edit text. To enable scalable training without manually annotated triplets, we automatically construct compositional training samples from large-scale image-caption pairs using a large language model. Based on these samples, we train a lightweight composition module with objectives that promote alignment with the target, edit-consistent semantic transformation, and retrieval discriminability. We conduct extensive experiments on ZS-CIR benchmarks and show that DiCE-CIR achieves state-of-the-art performance on CIRCO and competitive performance on CIRR while maintaining high computational efficiency.
Gwang-Ho Na, Ho-Joong Kim, Seong-Whan Lee
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-ku, Seoul 02841, Korea
Composed image retrieval requires identifying a target image from a gallery by integrating a reference image with a textual modification instruction. In a training-free zero-shot setting, this task relies on constructing a retrieval-oriented textual query within a frozen vision--language embedding space at inference time. Existing approaches predominantly rely on a single-pass generation strategy that fuses the reference context and modification text into a unified description. This strategy makes it difficult to detect or correct semantic distortions and omissions during generation. Consequently, the preservation of reference attributes and the integration of textual requirements interfere with each other, which degrades retrieval precision. To address these challenges, we introduce PEC-CIR, a training-free framework that structures query construction as a multi-stage reasoning pipeline. The framework operates through a Planner--Executor--Critic architecture where the Planner extracts explicit constraints, the Executor generates multiple candidate target descriptions, and the Critic evaluates these candidates based on constraint compliance. By reframing query construction as a staged inference process instead of a single-pass output, PEC-CIR reduces the propagation of generative errors by explicitly evaluating candidate queries before retrieval, thereby improving retrieval stability.
Gunho Jung, Jeong-Woo Park, Seon Bin Kim +1
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea