This paper presents XingChen-UniFE, a unified large audio language model (LALM) for general speech restoration (GSR) and target speaker extraction (TSE). The proposed model employs complementary semantic and acoustic representations through a dual-stream encoder, where a self-supervised learning model provides hierarchical semantic features and a learnable acoustic branch captures fine-grained structures from complex spectra. A bidirectional cross-attention module further facilitates information exchange between the two representations. The fused representation conditions the LALM for discrete speech token generation with task and speaker information. Experiments demonstrate strong performance on both GSR and TSE and robust generalization to unseen degradation conditions.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overall architecture of XingChen-UniFE. Enrollment speech is used only for TSE.
Figure 2: Overview of the complementary acoustic-semantic encoder. (a) Semantic and acoustic feature encoding; (b) bidirectional feature fusion.
Denoise
TSE
TSE&Denoise
PESQ
STOI
SBS
LPS
PESQ
STOI
SBS
LPS
PESQ
STOI
SBS
LPS
LLaSE-G1
1.218
74.23
.835
.823
1.127
66.81
.774
.654
1.091
61.04
.708
.456
UniSE
1.683
87.47
.884
.869
1.666
84.18
.882
.814
1.377
76.63
.815
.620
UniTok
2.100
90.14
.904
.894
2.015
83.71
.887
.797
1.640
79.22
.845
.678
Proposed
2.137
90.56
.916
.930
2.093
81.74
.888
.786
1.703
78.55
.852
.714
Table 1: Performance on Libri2Mix for Denoise, TSE, and TSE&Denoise using the mix-single , mix-clean , and mix-both subsets, respectively. Best and second-best results are bold and underlined .
Model
Noise
Rev.
Interf.
BW
Clip
Loss
Mixed
Avg.
UniSE
.754/21.8
.833/11.1
.884/7.1
.846/10.2
.873/6.4
.814/13.4
.335/89.1
.763/22.7
UniTok
.805 / 15.4
.836 / 6.7
.897 / 5.7
.853 / 7.8
.892 / 4.3
.828 / 10.3
.472 / 68.5
.798 / 17.0
Proposed
.840 / 10.8
.859 / 5.1
.903 / 5.2
.881 / 4.8
.899 / 3.5
.852 / 8.8
.548 / 55.4
.826 / 13.4
Table 2: GSR subtask performance measured by LPS ↑ / WER (%) ↓ . Mixed denotes samples containing all listed distortion types.
Figure 3: Task-wise ablation of the fusion and acoustic representations. Bars and lines denote Δ SBS and Δ WER relative to XingChen-UniFE, respectively; downward displacement indicates performance degradation.
Codec
Wind Noise
LPS
SBS
WER
LPS
SBS
WER
LLaSE-G1
.824
.855
8.70
.834
.852
8.16
UniSE
.900
.909
5.45
.896
.903
3.91
UniTok
.896
.937
3.29
.880
.920
3.80
Proposed
.896
.938
3.25
.900
.927
3.20
Table 3: Performance under unseen degradation.
PESQ
STOI
SBS
LPS
WER
Proposed
2.14
90.6
.916
.930
7.74
w/o Sem.
2.09
90.2
.902
.892
13.01
w/o Aco.
1.84
89.1
.911
.917
9.03
Table 4: Ablation of the acoustic and semantic branches on Libri2Mix mix-single .