Diff-IrisPAD: Modeling Bona Fide Iris Distributions for Unsupervised Presentation Attack Detection

Human perceptual priors have shown promise in saliency-guided deep learning training, particularly in the domain of iris presentation attack detection (PAD). Common saliency approaches include hand annotations obtained via mouse clicks and eye gaze heatmaps derived from eye tracking data. However, the most effective form of human saliency for raising generalization to unknown attack classes in iris PAD remains under-explored. In this paper, we conduct a series of experiments comparing hand annotations, eye tracking heatmaps, segmentation masks, and foundation model embeddings to a state-of-the-art deep learning-based baseline on the task of unknown attack type classification for iris PAD. Results in a leave-one-attack-type out paradigm indicate that denoised eye tracking heatmaps show the best generalization improvement over cross entropy in Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate (APCER) at Bona Fide Presentation Classification Error Rate (BPCER) of 1%. Along with this paper, we offer trained models, code, and saliency maps for reproducibility and to facilitate follow-up research efforts.

Iris presentation attack detection (PAD) is security-critical when a subsystem that appears reliable during development encounters presentation attack instruments (PAIs) or acquisition conditions absent from validation data. We benchmark three compact scratch-trained computer-vision models, each with at most approximately 0.26 million trainable parameters, on the Notre Dame subset of LivDet-Iris 2017 under PAI-driven domain shift and environmental degradation. All models are trained without external pretraining or data augmentation and evaluated over five seeds. A validation-selected threshold is transferred unchanged to the known-attack, unknown-attack, corrupted, and pooled test partitions. From known to unknown attack presentations, Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate (APCER) increases by 17.11-30.47 percentage points and Detection Equal Error Rate (D-EER) increases by 7.38-12.73 percentage points. At the validation-selected threshold, ZACH-ViT obtains the lowest unknown-attack APCER (47.69 +/- 4.84%) and D-EER (38.87 +/- 0.93%), while Compact-TransMIL obtains the lowest Bona Fide Presentation Classification Error Rate (BPCER). ZACH-ViT also gives the lowest unknown-attack BPCER at an APCER limit of 10% (81.29 +/- 1.95%). The high absolute errors show that the comparative advantage of the best compact model does not constitute deployment readiness under unknown PAIs.

Vision foundation models have demonstrated strong transferability across diverse visual recognition tasks and are increasingly considered for biometric applications. Their suitability for iris Presentation Attack Detection (PAD), particularly under realistic open-set operating conditions, remains insufficiently examined. This work presents a systematic failure analysis of general-purpose vision foundation models for open-set iris PAD using periocular imagery. Five representative foundation models are evaluated under three open-set protocols that explicitly separate different sources of distribution shift: unseen Presentation Attack Instruments (PAIs), unseen datasets captured with different sensors and cross-spectral transfer from near-infrared (NIR) to visible spectrum (VIS) imagery. Both frozen feature representations and parameter-efficient task adaptation using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) are assessed within a unified experimental framework. The results indicate that foundation models can transfer across datasets with similar sensing characteristics, but fail to generalise reliably to unseen attack instruments and degrade sharply under cross-spectral evaluation. While LoRA improves performance in certain cross-dataset settings, it frequently amplifies failure under attack-level and spectral shifts. Additional validation experiments using segmented iris inputs, full backbone fine-tuning, joint cross-dataset and cross-PAI shifts, and reverse VIS to NIR transfer further confirm that these failures are not simply artefacts of periocular input, weak adaptation, or one-directional spectral evaluation. These findings show that strong closed-set or cross-dataset performance should not be treated as evidence of robust open-set security, and highlight the need for PAD representations that maintain sensitivity to presentation artefacts while remaining stable under realistic deployment variation.