Autoregressive video diffusion models generate videos chunk by chunk, yet producing plausible continuations does not guarantee that they capture how scenes evolve. Under teacher forcing, strong temporal redundancy may allow local visual continuity to serve as a shortcut for current-chunk denoising, reducing the pressure to model visual evolution. We introduce Future Chunk Prediction (FCP), an auxiliary objective jointly optimized with teacher-forced denoising that predicts temporally separated chunks without access to the intervening visual context. Drawing supervision directly from training videos, FCP requires no additional pretrained visual encoder and leaves autoregressive inference unchanged. Our method achieves superior physical plausibility over standard teacher-forced autoregressive training with a lower overall training compute budget, highlighting the effectiveness and efficiency of future-chunk supervision for modeling visual evolution. Intriguingly, our visualizations suggest that FCP fosters a more structured representation space, which may be valuable for building autoregressive world models.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of Future Chunk Prediction (FCP). Intermediate representations from the autoregressive backbone condition auxiliary transformer blocks for future-chunk prediction.
Figure 2: Two variants of future-prediction supervision, illustrated through the green paths from ht to ft+3 . The chained design passes hidden states between predictors, whereas the parallel design conditions each predictor directly on the source representations.
Model
Params
IQ ↑
SP ↑
ST ↑
WS ↑
MSE ↑
Bidirectional
Wan2.2-5B ( Wang et al., 2025a )
5B
24.9
34.2
22.1
21.1
22.1
Sora 2 ( OpenAI, 2025 )
–
26.5
37.3
27.0
26.9
14.8
Cosmos3-Nano ( Aditi et al., 2026 )
A8B
29.1
40.4
22.0
24.6
29.5
Wan2.2-14B ( Wang et al., 2025a )
A14B
32.2
51.1
20.5
28.5
28.9
HunyuanVideo-1.5 ( Team, 2025 )
8.3B
33.4
47.1
26.9
29.7
30.0
Table 1: Physics-IQ Verified results for image-to-video generation ( Rädsch et al., 2026 ) . Baseline scores are primarily from the benchmark. IQ is the overall score. Params counts visual-denoiser parameters. Bold and underlined mark the best and second-best autoregressive scores.
ID
Method
I2V
V2V
IQ ↑
SP ↑
ST ↑
WS ↑
IQ ↑
SP ↑
ST ↑
WS ↑
(a)
Teacher Forcing
30.4
34.8
32.8
24.0
40.6
48.5
40.8
37.8
(b)
+ FCP (3 offsets)
32.1
33.6
39.3
23.2
43.0
50.3
44.6
39.8
(c)
+ FCP (3 offsets, chained)
30.7
34.6
33.0
23.3
40.5
48.5
39.3
37.9
(d)
+ FCP (5 offsets)
33.8
36.8
41.1
25.2
44.4
51.1
47.2
40.7
(e)
+ FCP (5 offsets, chained)
31.0
35.6
33.0
23.9
39.9
47.6
38.9
36.6
Table 2: Controlled Physics-IQ Verified ( Rädsch et al., 2026 ) comparisons on Wan2.2-TI2V-5B. The shaded row and columns mark our default configuration and overall IQ scores, respectively.
Figure 3: Qualitative comparison of teacher forcing (top) and FCP (bottom). Left: FCP predicts domino toppling along the expected direction (green arrows), whereas teacher forcing produces an anomalous collapse at the center (red box). Right: FCP captures the rise in water level as the ice melts (green Δ ), a detail missed by teacher forcing.
Benchmark
Metric
Teacher Forcing
+ FCP (Ours)
WorldModelBench ( Li et al., 2025a )
Instruction ↑
1.77
1.81 (+0.04)
Physical Laws ↑
4.28
4.47 (+0.19)
Common Sense ↑
1.17
1.36 (+0.19)
Total ↑
7.22
7.64 (+0.42)
PAI-Bench-G ( Zhou et al., 2025 )
AV ↑
63.54
64.81 (+1.27)
Common Sense ↑
90.90
92.10 (+1.20)
Table 3: Results on WorldModelBench, PAI-Bench-G, and PhyGround. All variants are based on Wan2.2-TI2V-5B and use matched training settings.
Figure 7
Figure 5: Spatial Feature Similarity Maps. Each map shows within-frame similarity to a selected query token. The top and bottom rows correspond to teacher forcing and FCP, respectively.
Figure 6: Spatiotemporal Feature Similarity Maps. The top row shows video frames, while the bottom row visualizes similarity to a selected query token across space and time.
Appendix figures & tables8 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Configuration
Wan2.1 T2V-1.3B
Wan2.2 TI2V-5B
Backbone depth
30
30
Hidden dimension d
1536
3072
FFN intermediate dimension
8960
14336
Source feature layers
9, 15, 21, 27
3, 12, 21, 30
Auxiliary DiT depth
3
3
Auxiliary initialization layers
17, 18, 19
28, 29, 30
Appendix
Table 5: Model configurations. All layer indices are one-based. Hidden and FFN dimensions apply to both the backbone and its auxiliary DiT blocks.
clean
noisy
text
chained
IQ ↑
SP ↑
ST ↑
WS ↑
MSE ↑
source
source
condition
connection
27.6
32.8
25.5
20.4
31.6
✓
28.8
33.0
29.5
21.0
31.9
✓
29.9
34.7
28.2
21.6
35.0
✓
✓
30.9
36.2
29.6
23.2
34.5
✓
✓
✓
29.8
34.8
28.4
22.0
34.2
Appendix
Table 6: Ablation study of the main components on Physics-IQ Verified ( Rädsch et al., 2026 ) . All variants are implemented based on Wan2.1 1.3B. The shaded row denotes our default configuration.
Fusion strategy
IQ ↑
SP ↑
ST ↑
WS ↑
MSE ↑
Token Concat
28.8
34.1
28.1
21.0
32.0
Dim Concat
29.5
32.2
31.2
20.6
34.1
AdaLN
30.9
36.2
29.6
23.2
34.5
Appendix
Table 7: Ablation study of feature-fusion strategies for injecting features into the future-prediction branch on Physics-IQ Verified ( Rädsch et al., 2026 ) . All variants are implemented based on Wan2.1 1.3B. The shaded row denotes our default configuration.
Figure 7: Additional Spatial Feature Similarity Maps. Each map shows within-frame similarity to a selected query token; two further examples continue in the next panel. Within each example, the top and bottom rows correspond to teacher forcing and FCP, respectively.
Figure 8: Additional Spatial Feature Similarity Maps (continued). Two further examples using the same query-to-token similarity visualization.
Figure 9: Additional Spatiotemporal Feature Similarity Maps. In each example, the top row shows video frames, while the bottom row visualizes similarity to a selected query token across space and time.
Figure 10: Detailed Spatiotemporal Feature Similarity Maps. In each example, the top row shows video frames, while the middle and bottom rows show similarity to a selected query token under teacher forcing and FCP, respectively.
Figure 11: Auxiliary Future Predictions. In each example, the top row shows the ground-truth video, while the middle and bottom rows show outputs from auxiliary branches at the future offsets indicated on the left.
Autoregressive video generation creates videos frame by frame or in chunks, conditioning each prediction on prior context for streaming and interactive use.
Causal video generators must predict from the past, but they need not learn only from it. In streaming autoregressive video diffusion, each emitted segment becomes a commitment that future segments must preserve. Standard training, however, only asks each causal state to explain the present. This creates what we call a representation-level planning gap: states that fit the current segment may discard identity, layout, and motion information needed for a consistent future. We introduce Video-Mirai, a training-only method that closes this gap without changing causal inference: the generator rolls out causally, a frozen foresight encoder reads the completed rollout non-causally, and a lightweight predictor distills the resulting stopped-gradient targets into causal states. Future frames supervise representations, never generator inputs. At inference, the encoder and predictor are discarded, leaving the original architecture, per-step FLOPs, and KV-cache behavior unchanged. Video-Mirai improves a strong Causal-Forcing baseline on 5-second VBench from 83.8 to 84.6 in terms of Total Score. On 30-second rollouts beyond the training horizon, subject consistency improves from 84.9 to 88.5 and background consistency from 90.2 to 91.9. Ablations identify future-conditioned targets as the key ingredient, and probes show that future frames become more decodable from current features. Causality should constrain inference, not representation supervision. Our study highlights that visual autoregressive models need foresight. Project page: https://y0uroy.github.io/Video-Mirai.
Yonghao Yu, Lang Huang, Runyi Li +2
The University of Tokyo · National Institute of Informatics · Peking University
Autoregressive video generators synthesize long videos through chunk-wise rollouts, yet they are typically trained to predict only the immediate future. This limited prediction horizon makes it challenging to maintain video quality over extended rollouts. To address this problem, we introduce Prospective Forcing, a multi-head prediction framework that injects long-range predictive signals into autoregressive video representations. Built on a rolling-window generator, Prospective Forcing attaches lightweight, offset-specific heads that share the same conditioning information and independently predict chunks at different future temporal offsets. By extending supervision beyond the next chunk, these heads encourage the shared history representation to retain information useful for longer-horizon prediction, supporting temporally consistent generation. At inference time, we accelerate sampling by using accepted future-chunk predictions to skip full-window backbone executions. We equip the head with learnable embeddings to generate multiple candidates for the next chunk, and a learned verifier either selects a candidate or rejects all and falls back to standard autoregressive generation.
Yifan Shen, Yewei Xia, Gongxu Luo +6
Mohamed bin Zayed University of AI · Institute of Foundation Models · Carnegie Mellon University
Autoregressive video generation has emerged as a powerful paradigm for World Action Models (WAMs). However, existing approaches suffer from slow training convergence and limited converged accuracy, particularly at high frame rates, as the training supervision is confined to the current chunk without explicit signals about future dynamics; they also suffer from slow inference due to iterative video denoising. In this paper, we present Next Forcing, a multi-chunk prediction (MCP) framework for causal world modeling that enables faster training, higher accuracy, and accelerated inference. Inspired by multi-token prediction in large language models, Next Forcing introduces an MCP training objective that augments the main model with lightweight auxiliary MCP modules to simultaneously denoise video chunks at multiple future temporal horizons (next1, next2, next3 chunks). These MCP modules form a causal chain across prediction depths, where intermediate features fused from multiple layers of the main model are leveraged to predict future dynamics, allowing near-future predictions to inform farther-future ones and providing dense multi-scale temporal supervision back to the main model. During training, the MCP modules significantly accelerate convergence and improve converged accuracy, especially at high frame rates: at 50 fps, Next Forcing achieves a 93.1% relative improvement over LingBot-VA at 5k training steps and 2.3x faster convergence, and establishes new state-of-the-art results on the RoboTwin benchmark (94.1/93.5% on Clean/Random). At inference, the MCP modules can be retained to predict the next video chunk in parallel with the current one, achieving 2x inference acceleration. Next Forcing also demonstrates significant improvements on PhyWorld, a benchmark evaluating adherence to physical laws in video generation, and over 50% FVD reduction on general video pretraining.