RGraph-Eval: Task-Grounded Scene Graphs for Evaluating Robot Video Generation

Generated videos provide useful visual motion priors for robot manipulation, but their visual plausibility does not imply physical executability. A generated video usually lacks metric geometry, grasp grounding, robot kinematic feasibility, and execution-time feedback, which makes direct trajectory replay unreliable in real-world manipulation. This paper presents GenVid2Robot, a rigid-geometric consistency framework that converts generated video motion into executable real-robot manipulation trajectories. Given an initial RGB-D observation and a task instruction, GenVid2Robot samples task-relevant semantic anchors from the real first frame, tracks these anchors through generated video candidates, and verifies whether the resulting 2D motion can be explained by first-frame RGB-D anchors under a sparse relative $SE(3)$ model. In this way, generated videos are treated as uncertain visual motion hypotheses rather than direct robot demonstrations. Only geometrically consistent motion is transferred to the robot. The accepted relative motion is then applied to the real grasp-time TCP pose selected by mask-constrained grasping, producing a grasp-conditioned execution trajectory that is consistent with both the visual motion prior and the physical grasp configuration. To reduce execution mismatch caused by RGB-D noise, calibration residuals, and small contact-induced displacement, a bounded depth-compensation module corrects local depth-direction errors without assuming full online replanning. Real-robot experiments demonstrate that GenVid2Robot improves the reliability of generated-video-guided manipulation by grounding visual motion priors with sparse metric geometry, grasp constraints, robot feasibility checking, and bounded execution feedback.

Human manipulation videos provide rich motion and interaction cues for acquiring robot skills without robot demonstrations. Video generation models synthesize such demonstrations from an initial scene image and task instruction, avoiding the need to record demonstrations for each task. However, the recovered motion captures only one scene-specific realization, leaving task structure, geometric relations, and constraints implicit. We present V2-STRep, a zero-shot framework that converts generated video motion into reusable robot skills through VLM-grounded structured task representations. The representation specifies motion phases, references, and task-relevant constraints, with targets described by minimal geometric structures: points, point-normals, axes, planes, and full 6D poses. VLM-provided 2D image-space cues are lifted into 3D using RGB-D observations to reconstruct task geometry and candidate grasp poses. Geometry-specific rules transfer motion to new scenes, while task-constrained trajectory optimization couples grasp selection with complete robot motion planning. It preserves task requirements while using remaining rotational freedom to accommodate joint limits. Updating deployment grounding and constraints enables reuse under new compatible instructions without generating another video. Experiments on six real-world manipulation tasks demonstrate improved execution success over baselines, reliable cross-scene transfer of successfully acquired skills, and adaptation to changed deployment instructions. Details are available on the project website: https://tuwien-asl.github.io/V2-STRep/.

Robot world models now generate synthetic manipulation videos, but evaluating them is hard: realistic-looking outputs often violate physical laws, temporal consistency or task logic, while conventional metrics and monolithic Vision-Language Model (VLM) judges return scores that do not say what failed. We present RoboGaze, a training-free multi-agent VLM evaluator that grounds the task and scene, routes each subtask to dimension-specific specialists and verifies their findings with a critic, producing temporally localized diagnostic reports that state what failed, when, why and how severely, under a schema of 6 dimensions and 30 failure types whose annotation reliability and coverage we measure. To benchmark it, we introduce RoboGazeBench, 914 human-annotated clips from five generators, conditioned on simulated and real-world data and running from 4.9 to 148.9 s. Across eight open-source and proprietary VLM backbones, RoboGaze outperforms every baseline; even a published agentic detector given the same schema and a slightly larger inference budget trails it by 10.1-12.3 description-F1 points, a margin that blinded human raters confirm. On the strongest backbone it closes 83% of the gap between chain-of-thought prompting and human agreement, and its critic curbs the "cry-wolf" false positives of standard VLMs, lifting mean clean-clip accuracy from 17% to 85%. The advantage is largest on held-out generators and long clips, and carries over to selecting generated demonstrations (80% vs. 71% precision).