Retrieval-Augmented Online Textual Memory for Episodic Memory Video Question Answering
Organizations: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Italy
Abstract
Long egocentric videos pose a central challenge for multimodal language models: the visual stream must be compressed into a memory representation that can be searched efficiently while still preserving the evidence needed for question answering. Building on an online textual-memory framework in which first-person videos are converted into temporally grounded captions, this work systematically studies the role of retrieval in episodic-memory video question answering. We evaluate how different retrieval units, query formulations, context budgets, and reranking strategies affect multiple-choice answering on QAEgo4D-Closed, isolating retrieval as the main variable while keeping the underlying generated memory fixed. Our best configuration, Parent, matches fine-grained caption subchunks, then provides their full parent captions to the reasoner. It achieves 56.4 % accuracy, matching strong full-memory and retrieval baselines while exposing only a small fraction of the textual memory at question time. More importantly, our analysis shows that better temporal coverage does not necessarily translate into better answers: increasing the retrieval budget improves temporal Hit@K and Recall@K, but can reduce accuracy by introducing visually plausible distractors and uncertain caption evidence. These findings suggest that retrieval-augmented egocentric memory should not be optimized only for evidence recall, but also for the reliability, specificity, and answer-discriminative value of the retrieved context. The study motivates more structured episodic memories that move beyond raw caption retrieval toward evidence-aware representations for long-form egocentric reasoning.
Figures & tables
| System | Acc. | Hit@K | Recall@K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 56.4% | 79.0% | 70.7% |
| Flat | 55.6% | 80.4% | 72.3% |
| Sub | 54.2% | 76.6% | 67.5% |
| Parent-Rerank | 53.8% | 79.0% | 70.7% |
| Sub-Rerank | 53.4% | 82.4% | 74.3% |
| Hybrid | 53.0% | 78.8% | 69.1% |
| Method | Acc. | Memory | Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground VQA [ 3 ] | 48.7% | 1.29 MB/min | – |
| ReKV-LLaVAOneVision 0.5B [ 7 ] | 50.0% | 68.92 MB/min | 12,544 |
| ReKV-LLaVAOneVision 7B [ 7 ] | 56.0% | 329.64 MB/min | 12,544 |
| Lando et al. Gemini-based [ 8 ] | 56.0% | 3.57 KB/min | 10,880 |
| Parent (Ours) | 56.4% | 66.07 KB/min | 3,600 |
Egocentric Video QA
Egocentric video question answering uses first-person camera footage to answer grounded questions about activities, objects, space, and time.
See all 46 papers