Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are bottlenecked by the scarcity of robot data. Egocentric human manipulation videos offer an abundant, diverse, and semantically-rich alternative that inherently captures manipulation intent. However, the embodiment gap makes it difficult to extract action-relevant representations from these videos. From the perspective of action execution, human hands and robots share analogous manipulation primitives---reaching, grasping, placing---yet exhibit distinct kinematics tied to their embodiments. This might motivate our key approach: egocentric video pretraining can yield shared action representations capturing transferable manipulation skills, while human-specific motion patterns should be disentangled to avoid interfering with robot policy learning. To this end, we propose EXE, an Egocentric Cross(X)-Embodiment pretraining framework that learns a factorized latent action representation from egocentric human videos, separating shared manipulation priors from embodiment-specific signals. By leveraging the shared action space, the robot policy acquires generalizable manipulation semantics from diverse human demonstrations without being biased by human-specific kinematics. This shared knowledge transfers across embodiments with different kinematic structures, enabling the same pretraining to benefit both parallel grippers and dexterous hands. EXE yields consistent gains over baseline without pretraining on RoboTwin 2.0, RoboCasa GR1, and real-world manipulation tasks.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Factorized Action Tokenizer. Sha./Spec. Enc. and Dec. denote the shared/specific encoder and decoder. The shared group uses one cross-domain codebook, the specific group per-domain codebooks.
Fig. 2: Overview of EXE. The VLM takes egocentric/robot images, instructions, and shared/specific action placeholders (dashed boxes) as input. Stage 2 predicts action codes at the placeholder positions; Stage 3 decodes VLM features into continuous actions.
Fig. 3: (a) EgoLive & RoboTwin 2.0 and (b) EgoLive & Robocasa GR1. Each panel shows three views: the Shared Token Distribution , the Specific Token Distribution , and the absolute 3D end-effector/wrist trajectories projections of a robot chunk ( top ) and a human chunk ( bottom ) quantized to the same shared code, where both moves to the same direction (green = start, red = end).
Type
Domain
Actived
Co
Domain
Actived
Co
Shared
H & R
59
58
H & R
64
64
Specific
H
64
–
H
64
–
R
64
–
G
64
–
TABLE I: Stage 1 codebook utilization. “Co” means the number of codes co-actived in both domains. H refers to Human domain, R refers to RobotWin2.0, G refers to Robocasa GR1.
Model
Params
RPT
Easy
Hard
AVG
SmolVLA [ 52 ]
0.5B
×
59.2
60.8
60.0
X-VLA [ 50 ]
0.8B
√
72.9
72.8
72.9
TurboVLA [ 53 ]
0.4B
×
–
–
60.2
EXE base
0.8B
×
68.4
65.2
66.8
EXE
0.8B
×
75.6
76.8
76.2
TABLE II: Evaluation Results (%) on RoboTwin 2.0. RPT: robot-pretraining on large-scale teleoperated data. EXE base is an ablated EXE without our Stage 1–2 pretraining.
Table 6
Fig. 4: Real-world evaluation on the AgileX Piper bimanual platform.
Stage 1
Stage 3
Easy
Hard
AVG
InfoNCE
Language Align
Bridge Feature
×
×
×
74.1
72.3
73.2
✓
×
×
74.6
73.0
73.8
✓
✓
×
75.2
73.0
74.1
✓
✓
✓
75.6
76.8
76.2
TABLE V: Ablation of EXE components on RoboTwin success rate (%).
Human Dataset
Robot Dataset
Easy
Hard
AVG
VITRA-1M [ 9 ]
RoboTwin 2.0
75.2
75.2
75.2
EgoDex [ 8 ]
RoboTwin 2.0
75.2
76.4
75.8
EgoLive [ 10 ]
RoboTwin 2.0
75.6
76.8
76.2
TABLE VI: Generalization across human datasets (%).