Machine Learning Applications in the Solar Interior and Atmosphere
Authors: Vishal Upendran, Carlos J. Díaz Baso
Organizations: SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA 94043 · Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Palo Alto, CA, USA 94304 · Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway · Rosseland Centre for Solar Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
The solar interior and atmosphere constitute a strongly coupled, multiscale dynamical system defined by continuous temporal evolution. Predicting the state of this system requires modeling physical interactions that span disparate spatial and temporal scales, constrained by heterogeneous and sparse data. This chapter formalizes the Sun within the mathematical framework of dynamical systems theory, defining a global state vector (S) governed by thermodynamical, kinetic, and magnetic properties. Because solar observations represent projected, multi-modal, and partially observable measurements (O[S]) of this hidden state, pure physics-based deduction is fundamentally constrained. We present a unifying thesis: the primary role of machine learning in heliophysics is to act as a structured family of mathematical operators---specifically Inference (I), Emulation (E), Propagation (P), and Control (C)---that reconstruct, simulate, and couple this global state vector across disparate physical layers. By framing the vast, multi-disciplinary literature within this unified state-space taxonomy, we demonstrate how data-driven techniques bridge observational gaps to resolve hidden multiscale couplings and dramatically accelerate the simulation of non-linear processes, establishing a rigorous pathway to predict the global evolution of the Sun.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: An illustration of different layers of the Sun. Art by Kelvinsong - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0. Taken from Wikimedia commons.
Figure 2: An illustration of the length and time scales of various phenomena observed in the Sun. The plotted ranges are compiled from the phenomenon–reference associations in the source table: granulation and supergranulation Rincon and Rieutord (2018) ; chromospheric network Priest (2014) ; sunspots Solanki (2003) ; light bridges Lagg et al. (2014) ; active regions Canfield (2000) ; Type I and Type II spicules Zaqarashvili and Erdélyi (2009) ; nanojets, picoflares, and nanoflares Klimchuk (2015) ; Parker (1988) ; coronal jets Raouafi et al. (2016) ; campfires Berghmans et al. (2021) ; Ellerman bombs and IRIS bombs Ellerman (1917) ; Peter et al. (2014) ; microflares Hannah et al. (2011) ; coronal bright points Madjarska (2019) ; coronal loops Reale (2014) ; solar flares Shibata and Magara (2011) ; CME source regions and global CMEs Chen (2011) ; prominences Parenti (2014) ; coronal holes and open flux regions Cranmer (2009) ; and the solar dynamo Charbonneau (2010) .
Figure 3: Several ways of using ML to perform inference of the solar state vector given observations. These include performing a direct inversion given the observations, or model the forward process in a data-driven manner.
Figure 4: Solar observations in AIA at 193 Å in the left panel, and AIA 1700 Å in the right panel. Several features in the images are marked in both the images. Credit: SDO/AIA team from LMSAL.
Oct 27, 2026·Vishal Upendran, Banafsheh FerdousiScientific ML
SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA 94043 · Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Palo Alto, CA, USA · Air Force Research Lab, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA