eess.IVOct 27, 2026

Quantized Edge Inference of a Self-Supervised SAR-Optical Encoder on Commodity x86 Hardware

Authors: Christian Sanchez-Leon, Dongming Chen

Organizations: Software College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Abstract

Self-supervised vision transformers are increasingly used as reusable encoders for Earth observation, but their inference cost on the hardware available in the field is rarely characterized. We deploy a pretrained SAR-optical masked-autoencoder encoder on three commodity x86 nodes, from a low-power CPU without AVX2 to an AVX2+VNNI reference, at FP32, FP16 and INT8 on the CPU and, where present, the integrated GPU, and report latency, energy (RAPL and wall plug) and linear-probe accuracy. Quantization is accuracy-neutral: INT8 changes micro-mAP by only +0.0006, within the seed spread, so precision becomes a pure cost decision. INT8 lowers CPU latency on every node, by 1.45x even on the CPU without AVX2, and CPU energy wherever it is measured, and the VNNI reference (1.53x) suggests a further gain beyond AVX2. The Pareto-optimal device shifts from the integrated GPU, which is 4.38x faster than the CPU on the weakest node, to the CPU as the CPU class improves.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Jul 9, 2026

Rethinking Small VLM Quantization: From Component-Wise Analysis to Hardware-Aware Edge Deployment

The emergence of vision language models with fewer than 3 billion parameters has accelerated the implementation of on-device multimodal intelligence. However, a detailed understanding of component-wise quantization remains a bottleneck for optimal deployment. This paper presents a systematic evaluation framework for empirically validating five hypotheses across six quantization configurations on the Jetson Orin NX and AGX. By separating the vision encoder, projector, and large language model backbone yields the following results: (1) Quantization sensitivity is governed by the structural paradigm (MoE vs. dense) rather than scale alone, with MoE backbones mitigating INT4 noise where dense backbones degrade; (2) SigLIP encoders incur disproportionate INT8 latency on Jetson Ampere--a deployment-specific encoder-kernel-hardware interaction, not a SigLIP flaw; (3) Although INT4 quantization of LLMs greatly reduces VRAM consumption, it also causes slower token generation due to dequantization overhead; (4) Composite quantization errors are largely additive, except along the modality-alignment path, which is architecture-dependent; (5) The intelligence-per-joule profile varies significantly across platforms owing to memory bandwidth constraints.
Sep 14, 2026

Is INT8 Portable? A Cross-Platform Measurement Study of Quantized Inference on Embedded and Automotive Accelerators

Eight-bit integer (INT8) post-training quantization is the default recipe for edge deployment, under a widely held assumption: INT8 makes inference faster at a small, predictable accuracy cost, and a model quantized once can be carried to any target. We test that assumption with a controlled measurement study across seven hardware classes -- ARM and x86 CPUs, a discrete GPU, an NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin iGPU and its NVDLA cores, and two vendor NPUs (Qualcomm Hexagon HTP, DEEPX DX-M1) -- holding the ONNX artifact and the quantization scales fixed so the integer kernel or ISA is the only free variable. Portability fails on three axes. (1) The sign of the INT8 speedup is set by the CPU's dot-product ISA (ARM dotprod/SDOT, x86 VNNI): cores that have it speed up by up to 2.1x, cores that lack it slow down by 1.7x, for the identical model and runtime. (2) INT8 outputs are not portable, and the rule is an invariance rather than a gradient: FP32 predictions are bit-identical for every pair (1000/1000), while INT8 predictions agree 1000/1000 exactly when two targets share an integer kernel and 958-965/1000 whenever they do not -- independent of whether the boundary is CPU<->CPU or CPU<->accelerator, and invisible to top-1 accuracy, which is preserved. (3) Vendor NPUs own quantization: a bring-your-own QDQ graph fails silently on one NPU (external scales ignored, accuracy 0.75 -> 0.005 while it compiles, profiles and runs without error) and loudly on the other (the compiler refuses the graph), so only the vendor's native path yields a correct engine. We further show that edge-NPU latency regimes are set by output/device-to-host transfer size rather than compute, and locate the transition with a fixed-compute sweep. We release the scripts and 32 reports. "Quantize once, deploy anywhere" is unsafe for embedded and automotive deployment, where per-input determinism and redundancy matter.
Jun 17, 2026

FrequencyFormer: A Co-Designed Sensor-to-Processor Pipeline for Frequency-Domain Vision Transformer Inference

Deploying vision transformers (ViTs) on sensor-edge systems is limited not only by on-device compute, but also by the energy and bandwidth required to transmit high-dimensional image data from the sensor to the processor. While in-sensor and near-sensor computing reduce this cost through early feature extraction, existing methods often provide only modest compression. We observe that the frequency domain provides a naturally compact representation of visual information and can be exploited at the sensor level to reduce sensor-to-processor data movement. Building on this insight, we present FrequencyFormer, a co-designed sensor-to-processor pipeline for efficient ViT inference. FrequencyFormer includes: (1) a multi-scale DCT tokenizer that compresses a 224x224 image into compact frequency-domain tokens, achieving up to 128x reduction in off-chip data volume with modest accuracy loss; (2) a LUT-based near-sensor hardware implementation that leverages fixed DCT coefficients for multiplier-free, energy- and area-efficient tokenization; and (3) a modified MIPI-based low-power communication architecture that further reduces transfer energy. FrequencyFormer serves as a drop-in replacement for standard ViT patch embedding and remains compatible with pretrained backbones across classification, detection, and segmentation tasks. The pipeline achieves 28.8 TOPS/W, reduces communication energy by 230x, and lowers total sensor-side energy by 2.22x, demonstrating frequency-domain tokenization as a scalable foundation for in-sensor ViT deployment.