A note on data-efficient finetuning of vision foundation models

Vision foundation models are increasingly reused as frozen backbones for downstream visual recognition, making parameter-efficient adaptation a central problem. Prompt-based adaptation, including Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT), provides a lightweight way to specialize these models, but its layer-wise behavior remains poorly understood: performance is sensitive to prompt depth, placement, and task distribution, and gains on standard in-domain benchmarks do not always translate into robust generalization. We argue that this limitation is not solely an optimization issue, but a layer-wise information allocation issue: existing prompt-based methods lack principled control over what prompt-conditioned representations should preserve, suppress, and propagate across depth. Inspired by the Information Bottleneck principle, we introduce Prompted Information Bottlenecks (PIB), a framework that regularizes layer-wise compression-sufficiency trade-offs and promotes a more coherent cross-layer information path. The key idea is that effective adaptation should be minimal yet sufficient, retaining task-relevant local evidence in earlier layers while progressively discarding nuisance factors and redundant details in deeper layers. Extensive experiments show that PIB achieves strong performance across 34 datasets, reaching 92.1% on FGVC, 93.01% on HTA, and 77.33% on VTAB-1k, while tuning only 0.35% parameters on average across the main settings. Beyond benchmark accuracy, PIB helps explain the non-monotonic behavior of prompt capacity scaling, reduces shortcut reliance, and improves robustness under distribution shift and fine-grained recognition settings. These results position PIB as both a practical method and an information-allocation perspective for adapting frozen vision foundation models. Our code is available at https://github.com/itsnotacie/MM-26-PIB

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as the de facto standard for parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of foundation models, enabling the adaptation of billion-parameter networks with minimal computational and memory overhead. Despite its empirical success and rapid proliferation of variants, it remains elusive which architectural choices, optimization techniques, and deployment constraints should guide practical method selection. This overview revisits LoRA through the lens of signal processing (SP), bridging modern adapter designs with classical low-rank modeling tools and inverse problems, as well as highlighting how SP principles can inform principled advances of fine-tuning approaches. Rather than providing a comprehensive enumeration and empirical comparisons of LoRA variants, emphasis is placed on the technical mechanisms underpinning these approaches to justify their effectiveness. These advances are categorized into three complementary axes: architectural design, efficient optimization, and pertinent applications. The first axis builds on singular value decomposition (SVD)-based factorization, rank-augmentation constructions, and cross-layer tensorization, while the second axis deals with initialization, alternating solvers, gauge-invariant optimization, and parameterization-aware methods. Beyond fine-tuning, emerging applications of LoRA are accounted across the entire lifecycle of large models, ranging from pre- and post-training to serving/deployment. Finally, open research directions are outlined at the confluence of SP and deep learning to catalyze a bidirectional frontier: classical SP tools provide a principled vocabulary for designing principled PEFT methods, while the unique challenges facing modern deep learning, especially the overwhelming scale and prohibitive overhead, also offer new research lines benefiting the SP community in return.

Modern pretrained vision models achieve strong accuracy but demand substantial GPU memory for fine-tuning, making edge deployment impractical. This paper compares five parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods (Full FT, LoRA, AdaLoRA, QLoRA, BitFit) on Transformers- (ViT-Small, TinyViT) and Mamba-based vision backbones (Vim-Small, MambaVision-T) under an on-device VRAM budget (e.g., 2 GB), together with three gradient-checkpointing strategies (none, static, and a proposed memory-budget-aware adaptive algorithm); and we evaluate three families of foundation-model baselines: zero-shot contrastive vision language models (OpenCLIP, SigLIP), self-supervised vision backbones with lightweight evaluation protocols (DINOv2), and autoregressive VLMs for prompt-based classification (PaliGemma, MobileVLM, SmolVLM). Experiments on CIFAR-100 and DTD report accuracy, training time, energy, and the NetScore family of multi-objective metrics, which we extend with two deployment-aware variants. QLoRA and BitFit cut energy 20-30% at a 1-2% accuracy cost; the adaptive algorithm reduces peak memory 43-79% with 9-30% energy overhead. DINOv2 surpasses fine-tuned models on CIFAR-100 (0.917 vs. 0.897) at a fraction of the energy, while small autoregressive VLMs remain uncompetitive.