Visually Irrelevant Hallucinations in Medical Vision-Language Models
Authors: Ke Zou, Nan Zhou, Tao Yang, Meng Liu, Linchao He, Zehui Liao, Ling Huang, Guangren Huang, Yidi Chen, Yi Zhang, Hu Chen, Huazhu Fu
Organizations: K. Zou is with the Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228. · N. Zhou, T. Yang, M. Liu, L. He, and H. Chen are with the College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China. · Z. Liao is with the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. · L. Huang is with the Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK. · G. Huang is with the Department of Radiology, Beihai People’s Hospital, Beihai, Guangxi 536000, China. · Y. Chen is with the Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, China. · Y. Zhang is with the School of Cyber Science and Engineering and the Key Laboratory of Data Protection and Intelligent Management, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China. · H. Fu is with the institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138632.
Medical vision-language models (VLMs) show strong performance in radiology report generation (RRG) and medical visual question answering (Med-VQA), producing free-form clinical descriptions and answers from medical images. However, they may generate clinically meaningful statements that lack visual evidence or contradict image content. We refer to these errors as visually irrelevant hallucinations and investigate them at the phrase level. We propose CLEAR (Counterfactual Localized Evaluation of Alignment and Response), a model-agnostic post-hoc framework for phrase-level hallucination risk estimation. CLEAR decomposes generated responses into visually assessable clinical phrases. For each phrase, phrase-conditioned grounding identifies a candidate visual region, which is selectively perturbed by a localized counterfactual intervention. CLEAR characterizes the intervention using two complementary auditing cues: response cues, capturing semantic and clinically meaningful changes in the generated response, and alignment cues, measuring changes in image-phrase compatibility. These cues are normalized and jointly modeled to estimate phrase-level hallucination risk. Across four datasets spanning RRG and Med-VQA, CLEAR outperforms state-of-the-art hallucination detection baselines across multiple medical and general-purpose VLMs. On MIMIC-CXR, CLEAR improves AUPRC from 85.10% to 90.23%. Its effectiveness is further validated on a GT-derived controlled VIH benchmark. These results establish visually irrelevant hallucination as an important fine-grained reliability failure mode in medical VLMs and demonstrate the value of model-agnostic visual-support auditing for more trustworthy multimodal clinical generation.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Motivation and overview of phrase-level visually irrelevant hallucination (VIH) detection. (a) A fluent VLM response may contain both visually supported and irrelevant clinical phrases, including positive and negative statements; therefore, response-level assessment cannot localize unreliable content. (b) Given the image I , query Q , generated response R , CLEAR performs post-hoc auditing and estimates a VIH risk for each atomic, visually assessable phrase Si . The same formulation applies to both RRG and Med-VQA.
Fig. 2: Overview of CLEAR. The VLM-generated response is decomposed into clinical phrases. For each phrase, a candidate visual region is localized and perturbed, after which the same VLM generates a counterfactual response.
Fig. 3: Architectural overview of Counterfactual Auditing Representation and Calibration in CLEAR.
Method
MIMIC-CXR
IU-Xray
VQA-RAD
MIMIC-Diff-VQA
AUC ↑
PRC ↑
F1 ↑
AUC ↑
PRC ↑
F1 ↑
AUC ↑
PRC ↑
F1 ↑
AUC ↑
PRC ↑
F1 ↑
MedGemma-4B-it [ 7 ]
AvgProb
67.33
76.00
66.88
55.86
71.70
55.57
60.06
62.80
56.12
47.39
78.01
69.60
AvgEnt
68.06
78.84
68.90
60.84
74.23
59.50
65.69
78.12
64.97
54.94
80.95
75.71
MaxProb
65.28
75.36
66.97
58.74
73.78
57.98
61.58
60.12
54.92
49.60
79.20
71.52
MaxEnt
66.21
77.62
68.33
61.59
75.31
64.20
65.06
78.21
72.68
60.87
80.71
78.29
TABLE I: HALLUCINATION DETECTION PERFORMANCE OF CLEAR AND EIGHT COMPETING METHODS ON OPEN-ENDED VQA AND RRG BENCHMARKS. BEST RESULTS ARE SHOWN IN BOLD , AND THE SECOND-BESTRE SULTS ARE UNDERLINED .Statistical significance using pairedt-tests are reported,wherenumbers in blue and red indicate p-values < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively.AUC and PRC denote Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC), respectively.
Method
RRG
VQA
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
RadFlag
76.69
76.51
79.83
79.03
85.82
85.88
Cross-Checking
74.62
79.66
80.62
73.67
82.18
79.49
CLEAR
80.10
89.08
85.28
82.11
87.43
91.55
TABLE II: Hallucination detection performance on the GT-derived controlled evaluation set. The best result in each column is shown in bold .
Fig. 4: Qualitative phrase-level hallucination detection examples of CLEAR. For each radiology image, multiple generated clinical phrases are grounded to their corresponding visual regions and independently assigned hallucination risk scores. Red boxes indicate phrases predicted as hallucinated, while green boxes indicate phrases predicted as supported.
CLEAR Components
RRG
VQA
Resp.
Align.
Norm.
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
✓
✗
✗
70.87
83.49
72.48
68.02
85.01
76.18
✗
✓
✗
65.46
78.71
66.41
65.18
80.79
67.80
✓
✓
✗
72.02
84.13
74.44
70.89
86.60
80.84
✓
✓
✓
75.06
87.83
78.84
72.56
89.95
83.43
TABLE III: Ablation study of CLEAR. Resp., Align., and Norm. denote the counterfactual response cues, counterfactual alignment cues, and percentile normalization, respectively. Results are macro-averaged across the evaluated VLM–dataset settings within the RRG and Med-VQA tasks. The best result in each column is shown in bold .
Fig. 5: Hard-case analysis of CLEAR. Bars report the prevalence of five non-exclusive phrase and evidence patterns among false-positive and false-negative cases. Negated or normal phrases are the most prevalent pattern, followed by limited counterfactual alignment variation.
Fig. 6: Counterfactual auditing-cue attribution of CLEAR. Absolute feature attributions are aggregated into response cues, including semantic persistence and clinically meaningful response changes, and alignment cues, capturing image–phrase compatibility and its intervention-induced variation. Bars show the mean normalized absolute attribution for false-positive and false-negative cases. Both error types exhibit similar attribution patterns, with response cues contributing approximately 65% and alignment cues approximately 35%.
Backbone
Perturbation
MIMIC-CXR
IU-Xray
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
MedGemma
Blur
79.75
90.23
84.07
76.00
81.40
79.79
Mask
79.60
90.09
84.06
76.52
81.72
80.01
Mean
79.60
90.08
84.12
76.55
82.01
79.95
Noise
79.62
90.11
84.11
76.59
81.83
79.89
LLaVA-Med
Blur
79.12
94.83
91.22
75.67
89.29
88.83
TABLE IV: Robustness analysis of CLEAR under different localized counterfactual perturbations across backbone models. Blur, Mask, Mean, and Noise denote alternative operators for constructing counterfactual images. Comparable performance across these perturbations indicates that CLEAR is not strongly dependent on a specific intervention strategy.
Backbone
Blur Radius
MIMIC-CXR
IU-Xray
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
AUROC
AUPRC
F1
MedGemma
5
79.68
90.12
84.08
76.16
81.80
79.81
10
79.61
90.10
84.06
76.55
82.16
79.95
20
79.75
90.23
84.07
76.00
81.40
79.79
LLaVA-Med
5
78.79
94.73
90.98
78.45
89.50
88.83
10
79.01
94.72
91.00
78.56
89.46
88.90
TABLE V: Sensitivity analysis of CLEAR with respect to the Gaussian blur radius on the MIMIC-CXR and IU-Xray benchmarks. The results show that CLEAR maintains stable detection performance across different blur scales. The best result for each backbone and evaluation metric is highlighted in bold .
Ke Zou received the Ph.D. degree in Computer Science from Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, in 2024. From 2022 to 2023, he was a Visiting Ph.D. Student with the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore. He is currently a Research Fellow with the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. His research interests include medical image analysis, vision-language models, foundation models, and agentic AI. His work has been published in leading journals and conferences in medical imaging and artificial intelligence, including The Lancet Digital Health , IEEE TPAMI , IEEE TCYB , MedIA , and MICCAI . He has served a Guest Editor for the IEEE JBHI and served as an Area Chair for MICCAI 2025 and 2026.
Table 12
Nan Zhou received the B.E. degree from Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, in 2022. She is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree at Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. Her research interests include medical image analysis, deep learning, and uncertainty estimation.
Table 13
Tao Yang received the B.E. degree from Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, China, in 2025. He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in computer science and technology at Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. His research interests include medical image analysis, multimodal large language models, and multi-agent systems, with a particular focus on their applications in healthcare.
Table 14
Meng Liu is a Ph.D. candidate at Sichuan University. He received his Master degree from Sichuan University in 2023. He is now focusing on medical image analysis, multimodal learning and uncertainty estimation.
Table 15
Linchao He received the B.S. degree from Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, China, in 2020. He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree at Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, where he is affiliated with the National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision. His research interests include medical image analysis, deep learning, and computational imaging inverse problems.
Table 16
Zehui Liao is a Research Fellow at the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she works with Prof. Jianfei Cai. Before joining Monash University, she received her PhD in Computer Science from Northwestern Polytechnical University under the supervision of Prof. Yong Xia. From 2024 to 2025, she was a visiting PhD student at the Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, under the supervision of Dr. Huazhu Fu and Dr. Liangli Zhen. Her research interests include medical image analysis, with a particular focus on multimodal large language models and learning under label uncertainty.
Table 17
Ling Huang received the Ph.D. degree in 2023 from Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Compiègne, France, where she conducted her doctoral research in a laboratory affiliated with the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS). She is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher at Imperial College London, London, U.K., and a Visiting Research Fellow at the National University of Singapore, Singapore. Her research interests include the theory of belief functions and its applications to uncertainty quantification, causal inference, and decision explanation in medicine. She has authored or coauthored more than 40 papers, including over 20 papers published in leading journals and conferences, such as Information Fusion, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Medical Image Analysis, ICML, ECCV, ACL, ACM MM, and MICCAI. She serves as an Editorial Board Member for Information Fusion.
Table 18
Guangren Huang is a Deputy Chief Physician in the Department of Radiology at Beihai People’s Hospital, Guangxi, China. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree at Guangxi Medical University. His research focuses on lung cancer, glioma, and medical imaging.
Table 19
Yidi Chen received his Ph.D. degree from The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and is currently an Associate Professor at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. He was previously a joint doctoral candidate at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. His research focuses on hepatocellular carcinoma and magnetic resonance imaging.
Table 20
Yi Zhang received the Ph.D. degree in computer science and technology from Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, in 2012. He is currently a Full Professor with the School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Sichuan University. His research interests include medical imaging, compressive sensing, and deep learning. He serves as a Guest Editor for the International Journal of Biomedical Imaging and Sensing and Imaging, and as an Associate Editor for the IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging and the IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.
Table 21
Hu Chen received the Ph.D. degree from the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, in 2011. From 2008 to 2009, he was a visiting doctoral student at the University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. He is currently an Associate Professor with the School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. His research interests include image and video processing, computer vision, and artificial intelligence. He has authored or coauthored more than 40 papers in these areas.
Table 22
Huazhu Fu (SM’18) is a Principal Scientist at the Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), ASTAR, Singapore. He earned his Ph.D. from Tianjin University in 2013. Prior to his current position, he was a Research Fellow at NTU, Singapore from 2013 to 2015, a Research Scientist at I2R, ASTAR, Singapore from 2015 to 2018, and a Senior Scientist at the Inception Institute of Artificial Intelligence, UAE from 2018 to 2021. His research focuses on medical image analysis, AI for healthcare, and trustworthy AI. He is an Associate Editor for several IEEE journals, including IEEE TMI, IEEE TNNLS, IEEE TAI, and IEEE JBHI.
Vision-Language models (VLMs) reliability in medical diagnosis is challenged by trust-undermining hallucinations. Existing hallucination detection approaches mainly focus on identifying factual inconsistencies between generated text and reference data. While some studies analyze where models attend in images, they seldom verify whether such attention truly reflects the visual evidence supporting the generated text. To address this gap, we propose Co}unter-Evidence Verification (CoEV), a training-free plug-and-play framework that detects and corrects hallucinations through evidence-based factual consistency verification. CoEV performs bidirectional verification between textual assertions and visual evidence, testing whether each statement is supported by its corresponding evidence region, and assigns each statement into a four-quadrant diagnostic map capturing combinations of text factuality and visual grounding. CoEV detects hallucinated content and serves as a post hoc refinement tool, correcting hallucinations without retraining. Extensive experiments on four medical datasets show that CoEV combats hallucinations in VLMs.For hallucination detection, CoEV consistently outperforms existing methods, improving average PR-AUC and ROC-AUC by 3.0% and 3.9% absolute points respectively, with notable gains of up to 18.5% in specific VQA scenarios. For hallucination correction, it improves Micro-F1 by up to 12.5%, reduces hallucination rates by over 11.9% on medical report generation, and also boosts medical VQA accuracy. These results show that CoEV enables reliable detection and correction of hallucinations, providing clinicians with dependable, evidence-based cues for diagnosis. Code will be released upon acceptance.
Nan Zhou, Ke Zou, Meng Liu +5
the College of Computer Science, Sichuan University. · Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore. · National Key Laboratory of Autonomous Intelligent Unmanned Systems, Beijing2026 Institute of Technology. +2
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used for medical image interpretation, yet they frequently hallucinate, generating clinically plausible but factually incorrect findings that pose direct patient safety risks. We introduce HalluCXR, a benchmark evaluating six architecturally diverse VLMs across 856 stratified MIMIC-CXR chest radiographs and three query types, yielding 15,408 model evaluations. An eight-category hallucination taxonomy with clinical severity ratings and a two-layer detection pipeline are validated against 250 human annotations (auto-detection F1=0.959; LLM judge F1=0.907). We find that 61.9--82.3% of outputs contain hallucinations, with clinically dangerous errors in up to 80.2%. Three key patterns emerge: normal radiographs paradoxically attract the most severe hallucinations, common findings are systematically over-fabricated while rare findings go under-detected, and response length alone predicts hallucination risk (AUC up to 0.908). A six-model ensemble reduces fabrication by up to 84.8% at the cost of increased omission; a three-model subset retains comparable performance at half the cost. These results establish that hallucination auditing, verbosity-based risk monitoring, and ensemble-based safety layers are prerequisites for clinical deployment.
Haoyu Wang, Zitong Li
Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
While medical Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in assisting diagnosis, they still frequently generate hallucinated responses that appear linguistically plausible but lack visual evidence. Such hallucinations pose risks to clinical decision-making and necessitate effective detection. Existing introspective detection methods primarily perform uncertainty estimation or logical verification by analyzing model responses conditioned on original or perturbed inputs. However, such external perturbations are often heuristic and context-agnostic, which overlooks the internal cross-modal dependency between generated tokens and related visual tokens during decoding. To address this issue, we propose VIHD, a Visual Intervention-based Hallucination Detection method that leverages targeted visual token masking to calibrate semantic entropy for more effective hallucination detection. VIHD locates visually dominant decoder layers via Visual Dependency Probing (VDP), executes Visual Intervention Decoding (VID) via token masking to calibrate the semantic distribution, and quantifies the resulting Calibrated Semantic Entropy (CSE) as a reliable hallucination signal. Extensive experiments on three medical VQA benchmarks with two medical MLLMs demonstrate that VIHD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, underscoring the importance of fine-grained visual dependency for hallucination detection. The code will be available at https://github.com/Jiayi-Chen-AU/VIHD
Jiayi Chen, Benteng Ma, Zehui Liao +3
Department of Data Science & AI, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia · Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China · Alfred Health Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia +1