Calibrating Attention-Based Token Pruning for Efficient Multi-Image Synthesis in UMMs
Organizations: Beihang University · KlingAI Research · Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Abstract
Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) enable powerful multi-image synthesis but incur substantial computation from long visual contexts. While token pruning offers a direct route to accelerating inference, existing methods are primarily adapted from understanding tasks, suffering from insufficient reference image exploration, confused conditional guidance, and pooling-induced ambiguity that degrades generation quality. To address these issues, we propose CATP, the first training-free context-compression method tailored to UMM generation, which Calibrates the discrepancies of general Attention-based Token Pruning for better quality-efficiency trade-off. Concretely, building on independent layer-wise pruning during denoising, we introduce Guidance-Consistent Pruning (GCP) to synchronize pruning decisions across conditioning branches, and a Taylor-Calibrated Attention Metric (TCAM) that derives a theoretically grounded second-order correction for pooling-induced bias. In addition, a Fast Scoring Operator (FSO) fuses the calibration into tiled online Softmax to reduce pruning cost. Extensive experiments across representative UMMs and benchmarks demonstrate that CATP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art token-reduction methods, achieving up to 2.09 attention-core speedup.
Figures & tables
| Method | MacroBench | MICo-Bench | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | Object | Human | HOI | De&Re | Overall | |
| Full Model | 8.89 | 8.51 | 7.97 | 7.20 | 8.14 | 47.52 | 40.68 | 42.47 | 53.69 | 46.66 |
| retain 25% tokens | ||||||||||
| Text-Aligned | 8.21 | 8.22 | 8.07 | 7.44 | 7.98 | 52.11 | 35.77 | 46.95 | 52.92 | 47.64 |
| VisionZip | 8.18 | 8.07 | 8.00 | 6.97 | 7.81 | 49.65 | 22.99 | 38.79 | 56.40 | 43.38 |
| SDTM | 8.13 | 7.99 | 7.68 | 7.50 | 7.83 | 38.96 | 24.79 | 25.86 | 41.52 | 32.90 |
| Method | Single | Multiple | Scene | Avg. | |||||
| Char. | Obj. | Char. | Obj. | Char.+Obj. | Char. | Obj. | Char.+Obj. | ||
| Bagel (Latent Space) | |||||||||
| Full Model | 8.50 | 9.28 | 7.97 | 9.22 | 8.60 | 7.49 | 8.21 | 8.15 | 8.43 |
| Text-Aligned | 8.16 | 8.77 | 7.56 | 9.10 | 8.25 | 7.46 | 8.23 | 7.64 | 8.14 |
| VisionZip | 7.06 | 7.90 | 6.78 | 8.64 | 7.97 | 7.40 | 8.50 | 7.58 | 7.73 |
| SDTM | 7.16 | 8.32 | 6.44 | 7.10 | 7.56 | 6.32 | 7.45 | 6.97 | 7.16 |
| GCP | TCAM | Retain 25% Tokens | Retain 10% Tokens | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | ||
| 8.32 | 8.19 | 8.14 | 7.62 | 8.07 | 6.65 | 6.87 | 7.25 | 6.85 | 6.91 | ||
| 8.75 | 8.65 | 8.36 | 7.45 | 8.30 | 8.23 | 8.28 | 8.39 | 7.38 | 8.07 | ||
| 8.76 | 8.69 | 8.51 | 7.87 | 8.46 | 8.40 | 8.33 | 8.31 | 7.54 | 8.15 | ||
| Pooling | TCAM | FSO | Latency | Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102.97 | 8.48 | |||
| 7.24 | 8.30 | |||
| 30.12 | 8.46 | |||
| 5.39 | 8.46 |
Appendix figures & tables9 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Method | Single | Multiple | Scene | Avg. | |||||
| Char. | Obj. | Char. | Obj. | Char.+Obj. | Char. | Obj. | Char.+Obj. | ||
| Bagel (Latent Space) | |||||||||
| Full Model | 8.50 | 9.28 | 7.97 | 9.22 | 8.60 | 7.49 | 8.21 | 8.15 | 8.43 |
| Text-Aligned | 7.06 | 7.36 | 5.17 | 8.33 | 7.33 | 6.13 | 7.95 | 7.26 | 7.07 |
| VisionZip | 4.38 | 4.62 | 3.67 | 7.50 | 4.01 | 4.27 | 7.11 | 6.06 | 5.20 |
| SDTM | 6.57 | 6.23 | 5.89 | 5.77 | 6.68 | 5.31 | 6.31 | 5.75 | 6.06 |
| 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8.75 | 8.65 | 8.36 | 7.45 | 8.30 |
| 0.25 | 8.73 | 8.70 | 8.34 | 7.73 | 8.38 |
| 0.50 | 8.76 | 8.69 | 8.51 | 7.87 | 8.46 |
| 0.75 | 8.79 | 8.76 | 8.49 | 7.77 | 8.45 |
| 1.00 | 8.81 | 8.67 | 8.37 | 7.74 | 8.40 |
| 1.25 | 8.83 | 8.65 | 8.35 | 7.68 | 8.38 |
| 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | Latency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 8.75 | 8.73 | 8.49 | 7.98 | 8.49 | 17.87 |
| 4 | 8.76 | 8.69 | 8.51 | 7.87 | 8.46 | 5.39 |
| 8 | 8.68 | 8.57 | 8.27 | 7.68 | 8.30 | 2.31 |
| Method | 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Pooling | 8.75 | 8.65 | 8.36 | 7.45 | 8.30 | 7.24 |
| Max Pooling | 8.59 | 8.56 | 8.29 | 7.50 | 8.24 | 7.23 |
| Mixed Query | 8.80 | 8.74 | 8.48 | 7.66 | 8.42 | 31.47 |
| TCAM + FSO | 8.76 | 8.69 | 8.51 | 7.87 | 8.46 | 5.39 |
| Method | Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct | Gemini-3-Flash | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | |
| Full Model | 8.43 | 7.65 | 6.45 | 5.42 | 6.99 | 9.01 | 8.48 | 6.93 | 4.45 | 7.21 |
| retain 25% tokens | ||||||||||
| Text-Aligned | 8.07 | 7.52 | 6.26 | 5.34 | 6.80 | 8.05 | 8.34 | 6.76 | 4.82 | 6.99 |
| VisionZip | 7.81 | 7.36 | 5.88 | 5.02 | 6.52 | 7.43 | 7.71 | 6.36 | 3.72 | 6.31 |
| SDTM | 7.68 | 6.75 | 5.28 | 3.88 | 5.90 | 7.84 | 7.69 | 6.42 | 4.59 | 6.63 |
| Method | 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Model | 8.810 0.045 | 8.412 0.083 | 8.048 0.078 | 7.256 0.099 | 8.132 0.047 |
| Text-Aligned | 8.210 0.041 | 8.164 0.060 | 8.064 0.048 | 7.406 0.064 | 7.960 0.027 |
| VisionZip | 8.128 0.065 | 8.010 0.091 | 7.966 0.168 | 7.012 0.153 | 7.780 0.065 |
| SDTM | 8.110 0.222 | 8.048 0.120 | 7.876 0.157 | 7.252 0.165 | 7.822 0.066 |
| ToPi | 8.570 0.056 | 8.278 0.073 | 8.240 0.087 | 7.532 0.113 | 8.152 0.032 |
| CATP (Ours) | 8.814 0.073 | 8.640 0.104 | 8.540 0.039 | 7.838 0.058 | 8.458 0.020 |
| Method | 1–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–10 | Avg. | Speedup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Model | 8.89 | 8.51 | 7.97 | 7.20 | 8.14 | 1.00 |
| SDTM | 8.95 | 8.79 | 8.41 | 7.65 | 8.45 | 1.04 |
| SDTM + CATP (Ours) | 8.91 | 8.98 | 8.63 | 8.06 | 8.64 | 1.41 |
| TaylorSeer | 8.76 | 8.48 | 8.21 | 7.70 | 8.29 | 2.39 |
| TaylorSeer + CATP (Ours) | 8.78 | 8.95 | 8.65 | 7.81 | 8.55 | 3.06 |
Efficient Multimodal Inference
Efficient multimodal inference reduces the compute, memory, latency, and energy needed to process image, video, audio, text, and sensor inputs.
See all 231 papers