cs.CVOct 29, 2026

Drone-PUR: From Visual Clue Discovery to Understanding and Reasoning in UAV Scenes

Authors: Jiahe Wu, Bing Cao, Xingyue Guo, Ruipu Zhao, Beiming Yu, Jiekang Feng, Qinghua Hu, Pengfei Zhu

Organizations: School of Artificial Intelligence, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China · College of Computer Science, VCIP, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China · School of Computer Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China · School of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China · 

Abstract

The reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) can be limited by incomplete or inaccurate visual observations in the general domain. In unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) scenes, small targets, subtle attributes, and changing viewpoints further complicate perception and understanding. Therefore, we introduce Drone-PUR, a dataset and benchmark organized around visual clue discovery, interpretation, and integration, corresponding to the three capability dimensions of perception, understanding, and reasoning. Reasoning samples are designed to require models to combine multiple visual clues to derive visually grounded conclusions. Its 11 tasks provide 175k training and 20k test samples spanning single images, image sequences, cross-modal images, and multiple viewpoints. All test samples undergo human review. Evaluating 22 general-purpose VLMs reveals persistent limitations in spatial judgment and cross-modal and cross-view reasoning. Across models, stronger perception is associated with better reasoning, while single-task fine-tuning further reveals selective bidirectional transfer between these capabilities. To examine domain adaptation, we develop UAV-PUR from Qwen3-VL through staged fine-tuning with auxiliary supervision. Its 4B and 8B variants improve overall multiple-choice accuracy by 18.33 and 17.52 percentage points over their pretrained counterparts, respectively. The dataset and project resources are available at https://drone-pur.github.io.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Apr 7, 2026

Can Vision-Language Models Think from the Sky? Unifying UAV Reasoning and Generation

Vision-Language Models have achieved strong progress in ground-view visual understanding, yet they remain brittle in high-altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle scenes, where objects are tiny and densely packed, textures are repetitive, and top-down orientations are ambiguous. We introduce UAVReason, a large-scale UAV-native dataset and evaluation suite for studying unified aerial reasoning and generation under this nadir-view domain shift. UAVReason aligns RGB imagery, depth maps, semantic segmentation masks, captions, and question-answer pairs within a consistent aerial domain. It contains 23.6K captioned frames, 273K VQA pairs including 68.2K two-frame temporal questions, and 188.8K cross-modal generation samples across RGB, depth, and segmentation modalities. We further adapt UAVReason-Bagel as a unified understanding-and-generation baseline that jointly optimizes language reasoning and dense visual generation objectives. Experiments show that general-purpose VLMs and off-the-shelf unified generators struggle with UAV-native grounding, while UAVReason-Bagel substantially improves over its pretrained counterpart, increasing VQA-1F F1 from 0.394 to 0.711, VQA-2F F1 from 0.427 to 0.822, and heading-aware VQA F1 from 0.798 to 0.973. For generation, it improves segmentation mIoU to 0.143 and reduces KID from 0.078 to 0.048 for depth-segmentation-text-conditioned RGB synthesis. More importantly, our ablations reveal a bidirectional synergy between synthesis and reasoning. Dense generation objectives improve temporal semantic consistency, while language-level reasoning regularizes sparse-condition image synthesis. These results suggest that unified reasoning and generation provide effective geometry-aware structural priors for physically grounded aerial intelligence. All data, code, and evaluation tools will be released.
Apr 17, 2026

PixDLM: A Dual-Path Multimodal Language Model for UAV Reasoning Segmentation

Reasoning segmentation has recently expanded from ground-level scenes to remote-sensing imagery, yet UAV data poses distinct challenges, including oblique viewpoints, ultra-high resolutions, and extreme scale variations. To address these issues, we formally define the UAV Reasoning Segmentation task and organize its semantic requirements into three dimensions: Spatial, Attribute, and Scene-level reasoning. Based on this formulation, we construct DRSeg, a large-scale benchmark for UAV reasoning segmentation, containing 10k high-resolution aerial images paired with Chain-of-Thought QA supervision across all three reasoning types. As a benchmark companion, we introduce PixDLM, a simple yet effective pixel-level multimodal language model that serves as a unified baseline for this task. Experiments on DRSeg establish strong baseline results and highlight the unique challenges of UAV reasoning segmentation, providing a solid foundation for future research.
Aug 12, 2026

AeroGround: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Aerial-Ground Collaborative Reasoning

Vision-language models (VLMs) have been widely employed in understanding and reasoning tasks for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Existing UAV benchmarks primarily focus on aerial-view scenarios. However, whether current VLMs can perform well on understanding and reasoning tasks in aerial-ground collaborative scenarios which are practical in real-world applications like rescue and infrastructure inspection remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce AeroGround, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating VLMs in aerial-ground collaborative reasoning. AeroGround is built upon a simulated aerial-ground dataset containing approximately 29,000 multimodal observation groups from diverse open environments, and provides 2,250 high-quality question-answering instances covering cross-view correspondence, spatial understanding, and reasoning. Experiments on 16 pretrained VLMs, together with two domain-adapted variants, reveal a substantial gap between current models and human performance: the best model achieves an average accuracy of 54.4%, whereas humans reach 93.3%. By systematically revealing the strengths and limitations of existing models in aerial-ground collaborative reasoning, AeroGround provides a foundation for developing more capable aerial-ground collaborative embodied intelligence systems.