FlexReader: Towards Adaptive Decoding Paths for Efficient Arbitrary-Length Scene Text Recognition

Scene Text Recognition (STR) models are trained almost exclusively on word crops of at most 25 characters, yet real deployments (signage, product labels, dense captions) require reading much longer text. This paper diagnoses that failure and then closes it. The diagnosis separates out-of-length failure into two simultaneously extrapolating axes (the encoder's width axis and the decoder's time axis) and shows that encoder width, not decoder length, is the dominant failure mode. Representation-side fixes bring only partial relief: training-free rotary rescalings recover at most 2-4 points of character error rate (CER), and a weighted fine-tuning recipe recovers 6-8 points while improving standard-benchmark accuracy, yet word accuracy on the Long Text Benchmark (LTB) stays near zero, because the residual gap lies in the decoding mechanism rather than the representation. We then close that gap at inference time, on an unmodified word-level checkpoint: the long image is sliced into overlapping crops at the model's training width, each decoded independently and in-distribution, and the reads stitched by geometry-anchored edit-distance alignment. This procedure reaches 42.79-43.05% bucket-average word accuracy on LTB across two base checkpoints, matching the published state of the art (41.57%) and beating it by 11-12 points on the hardest bucket, at wall-clock parity with plain decoding; applied unchanged to the public PARSeq checkpoint it reaches 47.11%. Once chunking is applied fine-tuning no longer helps: the decoding-side fix alone matches purpose-built architectures. We release the diagnosis harness and implementation.

Scene text recognition is reported as 89--97% accurate on the six standard benchmarks, and the problem is widely treated as saturated. We present an alternative reading. When the same test images are stratified jointly by ground-truth word rarity and character n-gram novelty against a reference corpus, accuracy at the rare-word x rare-trigram corner of the resulting 5x5 grid drops 10--18 pt below the q3/q3 centre across nine English specialised recognisers, and the same direction (corner below centre) holds on all 13 of 13 (language, model) pairs we test across four writing systems (Latin, Han, Han+kana, Arabic). The drop is not a capacity bottleneck. A 6x vision-backbone scale-up (CLIP4STR-Base 158M -> CLIP4STR-Huge 1.0B, OpenCLIP ViT-H/14 LAION-2B) leads every benchmark in aggregate accuracy yet leaves the stress corner unchanged (86.9 -> 86.5, within paired-bootstrap noise). Four converging probes--layer-wise probing, confidence-when-wrong, attention re-balancing, and a cross-script commit-vs-abstain error split--localise the failure to the autoregressive decoder's lexical prior. We then ask how much of the gap existing techniques recover. Of 16 non-architectural mitigations, the largest mean q5/q5 gain is +1.3 pt and none clears the paired-bootstrap noise floor; the only intervention that does is the architectural shift from autoregressive to CTC decoding (SVTRv2, +2.5 pt, p=0.02, n=474). A confidence-routed AR-CTC ensemble adds a directionally consistent +0.6 pt that stays within noise, and its dominant learned coefficient is each model's own minimum-softmax confidence--independently echoing the mechanism above. No configuration we test improves both the compositional corner and aggregate accuracy. The rare-input long tail thus points to architectural change rather than added capacity.

Scene Text Recognition (STR) remains challenging due to the diversity of text appearances, including curvature, rotation, and perspective distortion. Recent Transformer-based approaches perform well but usually rely on one-dimensional positional encodings that ignore the 2D spatial structure of text images. Axial 2D extensions of Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE) exist for vision Transformers, but they assume roughly square, isotropic image content and apply the rotation only within encoder self-attention. Scene text violates both assumptions: crops are markedly anisotropic, and STR models are encoder-decoder, so the decoder must relate its queries to the encoder's 2D layout through cross-attention. We introduce 2D-RoPE-STR, which adapts axial 2D-RoPE to this setting through (1) an anisotropic row/column dimension allocation matched to the aspect ratio of text, and (2) an extension of the rotary coupling into encoder-decoder cross-attention, letting autoregressive decoding steps attend to encoder tokens by their 2D layout, a setting not addressed by prior encoder-only formulations. Both changes are essentially parameter-free and require no architectural redesign beyond the positional-encoding module. We further introduce a diagnostic protocol (a controlled ablation pair isolating only the positional encoding, an image-level net-win disagreement analysis, and encoder attention visualization) that identifies where and why relative 2D position helps: curved, rotated, and perspective-distorted layouts where reading order departs from a straight horizontal line. On six standard benchmarks (IIIT5K, SVT, ICDAR 2013, ICDAR 2015, CUTE80, SVTP), gains concentrate on exactly these irregular layouts, with ablations isolating each design choice against 1D RoPE and 2D sinusoidal and learnable alternatives.