VLA Policies Do Not Know When Not to Act: Unintended Task Execution and Start Suppression

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are increasingly expected to not only complete robot tasks, but also follow human instructions about how those tasks should be executed. However, existing robot datasets usually pair trajectories with coarse goal-level language, leaving execution-critical details such as active arm, approach direction, and contact region unspecified. This limits steerable policy learning and robotic video understanding. We introduce FineVLA, an open framework for action-aligned fine-grained VLA supervision. The framework includes: (1) a data construction tool that unifies 972,247 trajectories across 85K tasks from 10 open-source robot datasets and builds FineVLA-Data, a human-verified dataset of 47,159 fine-grained trajectories; (2) a held-out benchmark with 500 videos, 11,631 atomic facts, and 1,030 VQA questions; (3) a robotics-specialized VLM annotator for scalable fine-grained annotation; and (4) a steerable VLA policy trained with controlled mixtures of fine-grained and raw goal-level instructions. Our experiments yield three findings. First, fine-grained supervision does not sacrifice goal-level success: FG-only improves over Raw-only by +1.4 to +8.1 success-rate points across settings. Second, fine-grained and raw instructions are complementary, following a consistent inverted-U trend peaking at FG:Raw = 1:2 to 1:1. The best mixed setting reaches 86.8%/82.5% in RoboTwin simulation and 62.7/100 in real-world dual-arm manipulation (vs. 49.9 Raw-only). Third, fine-grained supervision improves steerable control: the largest real-world gains appear on pose (+23), color (+18), and approach direction (+18)--factors where goal-level instructions provide no guidance. Overall, fine-grained language should augment goal-level instructions: specifying how to execute alongside what to achieve. Project page: https://finevla.xlang.ai/

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies can execute many tasks from standard initial states, yet a new instruction may fail after another task has altered the robot's physical state. We study instruction switching, where a new task is issued during or after the execution of a different one. We observe that a target task that is reliably completed from its standard initial states can become inaccessible from states produced by a preceding task. We call such states task islands. We propose Causeway, a training-free inference-time intervention. Given the current state and a re-entry pose for the target task, Causeway back-propagates through the frozen decoding computation and applies a state-directed write within the action-stream representation. The VLA decodes the return motion itself, without parameter updates, a new action head, or external action generation. Across 71 cross-object pairs, three switch timings, and three VLA architectures on LIBERO-Goal, Causeway raises bare-switch success from 3-26% to 47-65% and increases the rate of reaching the handoff neighborhood by 42-72 percentage points across models. Additional experiments on LIBERO-Object and a real xArm platform show that the recovery extends beyond the main LIBERO-Goal setting, both in simulation and on a robot.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control, but the mapping from language to behavior is often brittle and unintuitive: semantically similar instructions can induce drastically different behaviors, while some capabilities may not be elicitable through prompting alone. As a result, both human instructions and zero-shot language models can fail to reliably steer VLAs toward successful task execution. In this work, we propose a framework that interactively searches for language sequences that improve closed-loop VLA task performance, distills these sequences into a test-time language feedback policy (LFP), and learns an improvement head that predicts when language steering will improve performance. We conformalize this improvement head to prevent harmful steering interventions, where the LFP decreases task performance relative to the original instruction on out-of-distribution scenarios. Crucially, our approach operates on arbitrary frozen pre-trained VLAs, requiring neither access to the original training distribution nor fine-tuning of the underlying model. On seen environments, our conformalized LFP improves base VLA performance by 24.7% in simulation and 65.0% in hardware. On visual and semantic perturbations with calibration samples, our conformalized LFP has strong harmlessness guarantees, and produces recovery behaviors not observed with open-loop prompting.