Cross-view geolocalization aims to determine the geographic location of a ground-level image by retrieving its corresponding satellite image, offering a promising alternative for localization in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-denied or degraded environments such as urban canyons, dense forests, and disaster scenarios. Despite recent progress, existing approaches remain limited by the lack of globally diverse training datasets and benchmarks that are often geographically restricted. Furthermore, most benchmarks rely on panoramic ground views, which do not reflect the limited field-of-view imagery captured by real world cameras. To address these challenges, we introduce Cross-View World 500k (CVW500k), a large-scale globally distributed dataset containing over 500,000 ground-satellite image pairs collected across diverse geographic regions and environments. Unlike previous datasets, CVW500k uses limited field-of-view ground images, providing a more realistic and challenging setting for cross-view geolocalization. In addition, we propose GeoQueryNet, a query-based cross-view fusion transformer framework designed to bridge the viewpoint gap between ground and satellite images. The model leverages a CLIP-based visual encoder with parameter-efficient LoRA adaptation and introduces a Cross-View Alignment Module that uses learnable query tokens to extract geographically consistent features across viewpoints. Our code can be found here: https://github.com/Fahim17/Cross_View_World_Dataset.git .
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Global spatial distribution of CVW500k datapoints. BLUE markers indicate inland locations, while RED markers represent coastal locations within 35 miles of the coastline. The overlaid ground-view examples illustrate the geographic and visual diversity of the dataset across different regions, road environments, landscapes, and urban-rural settings.
CVUSA
CVACT
VIGOR
GAMa
CVW500k
Viewpoints
Ground, Satellite
Ground, Satellite
Ground, Satellite
Ground, Satellite
Ground, Satellite
Area Coverage
City
City
City
City
World wide
Satellite images
44,416
128,334
90,618
1.97M
500,098
Ground images
44,416
128,334
238,696
51,535
500,098
Multiple Cities
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Field of View
Panorama
Panorama
Panorama
Limited
Limited
Table 1. Comparison between the proposed CVW500k dataset and existing datasets for cross-view geolocalization. Details are provided in the supplementary material.
Figure 2. GeoQueryNet : Overview of the proposed GeoQueryNet framework. Ground and satellite images are processed through shared-weight image encoders with LoRA-based adaptation, producing view-specific features that are refined by the Cross-View Alignment Module. The aligned ground and satellite embeddings are then matched against the satellite gallery to retrieve the most likely geographic location.
Methods
CVUSA
CVACT
CVW500k
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1%
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1%
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1%
Sample4Geo ( Deuser et al., 2023 )
55.10
78.30
85.0
96.6
27.90
52.0
62.30
87.0
0.22
0.86
1.52
23.98
GeoDTR ( Zhang et al., 2023 )
13.20
30.33
39.58
73.58
5.3
15.67
22.95
57.64
2.01
6.95
11.08
70.44
GeoDTR+ ( Zhang et al., 2024 )
8.47
22.60
31.58
69.48
6.04
16.79
24.94
60.58
2.63
8.71
13.81
75.45
ConGeo ( Mi et al., 2024 )
55.50
75.40
81.50
93.90
40.60
62.60
69.80
86.60
4.80
13.35
18.97
69.87
MEAN ( Chen et al., 2025 )
5.23
15.33
22.74
60.15
5.38
15.87
23.36
61.09
3.45
11.38
17.43
80.96
Table 2. Comparison of baseline cross-view geolocalization methods on CVUSA, CVACT, and the proposed CVW500k dataset. All methods are fine-tuned under the same training protocol.
CVW500k
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1%
Sample4Geo ( Deuser et al., 2023 )
0.22
0.86
1.52
23.98
GeoDTR ( Zhang et al., 2023 )
2.01
6.95
11.08
70.44
GeoDTR+ ( Zhang et al., 2024 )
2.63
8.71
13.81
75.45
ConGeo ( Mi et al., 2024 )
4.80
13.35
18.97
69.87
MEAN ( Chen et al., 2025 )
3.45
11.38
17.43
80.96
CAMP ( Wu et al., 2024 )
5.47
15.87
23.38
85.07
Table 3. Performance comparison on the CVW500k dataset for GeoQueryNet and existing works.
Figure 3. Qualitative comparison of cross-view geolocalization retrieval by GeoQueryNet, GeoDTR, and QDFL. Each group includes a ground-view query, ground-truth satellite image, and Top-5 retrieved satellite candidates per model.
Figure 4. The impact of LoRA adaptation and the Cross-View Alignment Module on geolocalization retrieval performance. Results compare CVW500k retrieval scores when (Orange) LoRA is removed and only the alignment module is trained, and when (Blue) LoRA is used without the alignment module.
Figure 5. Qualitative ablation comparison of GeoQueryNet, GeoQueryNet without LoRA, and GeoQueryNet without Cross-View Alignment Module (CVAM).
Rank
Top 1
Top 5
Top 10
Top 1%
8
9.97
26.63
36.98
87.56
16
10.45
27.60
37.99
89.00
32
15.19
42.10
54.04
90.87
64
13.41
33.78
45.49
96.06
Table 4. LoRA rank ablation study showing the retrieval performance of GeoQueryNet on the CVW500k dataset using different LoRA ranks.
GeoQueryNet
T@1
T@5
T@10
Train
Test
Argentina
26.09
55.85
68.81
40561
4521
Colombia
28.91
57.15
67.47
24860
2890
Chile
32.58
59.04
69.47
22434
2563
Bolivia
36.85
63.68
74.64
16958
1881
United States
36.91
62.94
74.74
16745
2178
Russia
32.17
61.59
72.46
12465
1318
Table 5. Country-wise cross-view geolocalization retrieval performance measured using Top-5 and Top-10 accuracy. Train and Test column shows the Training and Test split for individual experiment.
Models
Total Params (M)
Trainable Params (M)
GFLOPs / Batch(50)
GFLOPs / Image Pair
Inference Time / Batch (50) (ms)
Inference Time / Image Pair (ms)
Sample4Geo ( Deuser et al., 2023 )
11.1765
11.1765
391.0309
4.0732
23.4351
0.4928
GeoDTR ( Zhang et al., 2023 )
48.5086
48.5086
965.4937
48.2747
593.41
11.8682
GeoDTR+ ( Zhang et al., 2024 )
30.0477
30.0477
209.7180
10.4859
167.405
3.3481
CAMP ( Wu et al., 2024 )
91.3954
91.3954
5784.2772
45.1896
471.035
9.4207
DSTG ( Liang et al., 2025 )
42.4401
42.4401
391.4572
12.2330
249.995
4.9999
GeoQueryNet
2188.0769
216.2878
4219.0629
527.3829
1102.17
22.0434
Table 6. Computational complexity and inference efficiency comparison of GeoQueryNet with baseline cross-view geolocalization methods on CVW500k.
Figure 6. (a) Continent distribution: The pie chart illustrates the proportion of images collected from different continents. (b) Coastal vs. inland distribution: The dataset contains images from both inland and coastal regions.
Figure 7. Impact of Geographic Diversity on Cross-View Retrieval Performance.
Appendix figures & tables7 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 8. Success Case: Top 10 retrieval of our method on CVW500K dataset
Figure 9. Partial Success Case: Top 10 retrieval of our method on CVW500K dataset
Figure 10. Failed Case: Top 10 retrieval of our method on CVW500K dataset
Figure 11. Climate zone distribution of the dataset based on the Köppen climate classification . The dataset covers diverse environmental regions including tropical, arid, temperate, cold, and polar climates, demonstrating broad geographic and environmental diversity.
Cross-view geo-localization (CVGL) aims to establish spatial correspondences between images captured from significantly different viewpoints and constitutes a fundamental technique for visual localization in GNSS-denied environments. Nevertheless, CVGL remains challenging due to severe geometric asymmetry, texture inconsistency across imaging domains, and the progressive degradation of discriminative local information. Existing methods predominantly rely on spatial domain feature alignment, which is inherently sensitive to large scale viewpoint variations and local disturbances. To alleviate these limitations, this paper proposes the Spatial and Frequency Domain Enhancement Network (SFDE), which leverages complementary representations from spatial and frequency domains. SFDE adopts a three branch parallel architecture to model global semantic context, local geometric structure, and statistical stability in the frequency domain, respectively, thereby characterizing consistency across domains from the perspectives of scene topology, multiscale structural patterns, and frequency invariance. The resulting complementary features are jointly optimized in a unified embedding space via progressive enhancement and coupled constraints, enabling the learning of cross-view representations with consistency across multiple granularities. Comprehensive experiments show that SFDE achieves competitive performance and in many cases even surpasses state-of-the-art methods, while maintaining a lightweight and computationally efficient design. {Our code is available at https://github.com/Mashuaishuai669/SFDE
Hongying Zhang, ShuaiShuai Ma
School of Electronic Information and Automation, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, 300300, China
Robust cross-view geo-localization (CVGL) remains challenging despite the surge in recent progress. Existing methods still rely on field-of-view (FoV)-specific training paradigms, where models are optimized under a fixed FoV but collapse when tested on unseen FoVs and unknown orientations. This limitation necessitates deploying multiple models to cover diverse variations. Although studies have explored dynamic FoV training by simply randomizing FoVs, they failed to achieve robustness across diverse conditions -- implicitly assuming all FoVs are equally difficult. To address this gap, we present SinGeo, a simple yet powerful framework that enables a single model to realize robust cross-view geo-localization without additional modules or explicit transformations. SinGeo employs a dual discriminative learning architecture that enhances intra-view discriminability within both ground and satellite branches, and is the first to introduce a curriculum learning strategy to achieve robust CVGL. Extensive evaluations on four benchmark datasets reveal that SinGeo sets state-of-the-art (SOTA) results under diverse conditions, and notably outperforms methods specifically trained for extreme FoVs. Beyond superior performance, SinGeo also exhibits cross-architecture transferability. Furthermore, we propose a consistency evaluation method to quantitatively assess model stability under varying views, providing an explainable perspective for understanding and advancing robustness in future CVGL research. Codes will be available upon acceptance.
Yang Chen, Xieyuanli Chen, Junxiang Li +2
College of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology
Fine-grained Cross-View Localization (CVL) estimates the precise position and orientation of a ground-level image by aligning it with geo-referenced aerial imagery, offering a scalable alternative to Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) in challenging urban environments. Existing datasets rely on data collected with high-end sensor suites, which inherently limit image diversity and scalability. While in-the-wild images are abundant, their noisy geo-tags make them unsuitable for reliable evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce OpenCVL, a large-scale, diverse, and open dataset containing 617,388 ground-aerial image pairs spanning 41 cities across four European countries. All images are sourced from permissive platforms, ensuring long-term accessibility and supporting open and reproducible research. The training set combines images captured with high-end sensors with diverse in-the-wild imagery. We further develop a data curation framework that filters and corrects pose annotations to construct reliable in-the-wild evaluation data. In addition, OpenCVL includes dedicated cross-area and snowy test sets to assess generalization and robustness. Experiments with a state-of-the-art CVL model on OpenCVL show that incorporating noisy in-the-wild data consistently improves performance on clean test sets, suggesting a promising direction for scaling CVL with diverse real-world imagery.
Zimin Xia, Mubariz Zaffar, Junsheng Fu +2
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland · Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), China · Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands +1