Black Hole Love Numbers with Physics-Informed Neural Networks

The AInstein architecture introduced an unsupervised neural method for solving the Riemannian Einstein equations on arbitrary manifolds. This Physics Informed Neural Network approach (PINN) is extended here to Lorentzian signature, validated by recovering the maximally extended Schwarzschild geometry, and tested as novel search method for arbitrary black hole solutions. The topology is built into the architecture by treating $S^{2}$ globally through its standard embedding, such that the network learns an ambient metric on the manifold $\mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{R}^{3}$, where Penrose coordinates are chosen for $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the metric on $S^{2}$ is obtained by pullback. The architecture is first trained with the objective of recovering the Schwarzschild metric via losses encoding the vacuum Einstein equation, a quadratic Weyl scalar constraint, and the $SO(3)$ symmetry of the resultant metric; directly motivated by the Birkhoff--Jebsen theorem. Following this, the objective is generalised to use the Petrov speciality index, a horizon curvature anchor, and a trapped-surface constraint, to allow search for algebraically general Petrov type I solutions, finding potentially novel general-type Lorentzian Einstein metrics with a genuinely trapped interior.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed governing equations in their loss function, enabling mesh-free solutions to partial differential equations. Low training loss is treated as evidence that the learned solution is physically correct. This paper shows that assumption breaks down when encoded physics are incorrect. By perturbing PDE parameters before training, a setting we describe as physics parameter poisoning or parameter misspecification, we produce models that train to low loss but give incorrect answers; we treat the perturbation schedule as sensitivity analysis rather than only as a security threat, and none of our claims requires an adversary. Achieving low residual loss does not discriminate accurate from inaccurate solutions: poisoned models reach losses at or below the clean baseline yet differ by large margins, so driving the residual down is not evidence of physical accuracy. Across three PDE systems (Burgers equation, Navier-Stokes cavity, and convection-diffusion), poisoned models match or beat the clean-model training loss while their solutions differ by up to 71% in the fixed sweep and up to 128% under adversarial search; at Cavity Re=400 the poisoned loss falls below the clean baseline. We define a detection difficulty ratio R (solution error divided by training loss) to summarize how invisible the corruption is, though cross-PDE comparison is complicated by differences in loss scale. We test six candidate defenses, none of which reliably detects corruption across all regimes. We propose a post-hoc defense: sweeping the PDE residual loss across parameter values without retraining. The loss minimum recovers the true training parameter without external data, and generalizes across all three PDE systems. The effect holds across five network architectures (8.7K to 133K parameters), is bidirectional, and is confirmed across multiple random seeds.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers. The obstacle is increasingly understood to be one of optimisation, owing to the severely ill-conditioned loss landscape. We present $\textbf{DSGNAR}$: Doubly-Sketched Gauss-Newton with Adaptive Ratio, a scalable second-order optimisation framework that confronts this ill-conditioning and, in doing so, obtains unprecedented accuracy and speed. $\textbf{DSGNAR}$ couples a doubly-sketched Gauss-Newton model with a novel strategy that carefully controls both regularisation and step length. Across a suite of problems spanning nonlinear, chaotic, multi-scale, high-dimensional, and Navier-Stokes, the framework greatly improves on the state of the art: able to attain relative $\ell_2$ errors as low as $3\times10^{-16}$ in double precision, improve contemporary results by five orders of magnitude on the canonical Burgers' equation, and as much as eight orders on a high-dimensional Poisson problem, while remaining markedly faster. We further show that, in single precision, solutions at the limit of round-off error can be obtained very quickly: Burgers' equation to $\ell_2^{\text{rel}} = 4.75 \times 10^{-7}$ in under ten seconds. The framework is also robust to the choice of architecture, arithmetic precision, and initial hyperparameters. The code is available at https://www.github.com/wephy/physics-informed-neural-networks