Agnostic Learning by Imitating

Agnostic online learning is classically solved via a reduction to the realizable setting, utilizing Littlestone's Standard Optimal Algorithm (SOA) as a base learner. However, the SOA is computationally intractable to execute even for a single round. To overcome this barrier, recent work in oracle-efficient online learning replaces the SOA with a realizable base learner that accesses the concept class exclusively through an offline empirical risk minimization (ERM) oracle. While such agnostic learners achieve near-optimal expected regret, they suffer from a doubly-exponential oracle complexity of $O\big(T^{2^{O(d_\mathrm{LD})}}\big)$, where $d_\mathrm{LD}$ is the Littlestone dimension and $T$ is the number of rounds. In this work, we significantly improve this oracle complexity while relying on an even weaker primitive: a weak-consistency oracle, which merely decides whether a given labeled dataset is realizable. At the core of our approach is an adaptive and dynamic agnostic-to-realizable reduction that actively prunes non-realizable label sequences on the fly. By using the VC dimension ($d_\mathrm{VC}$) to bound the number of dynamically maintained active paths, our algorithm reduces the total query complexity down to $O(T^{d_\mathrm{VC}+1})$ while perfectly preserving near-optimal expected regret. Crucially, this dynamic pruning also yields a memory reduction over the standard reduction. Furthermore, we formally quantify the regret--oracle complexity tradeoff, providing upper bounds that smoothly interpolate between restricted query budgets and attainable expected regret. We complement these with lower bounds proving that any learner restricted to $Q = o(\sqrt{T})$ queries must suffer an expected regret of $Ω(T/Q)$.

Modern machine learning systems, such as generative models and recommendation systems, often evolve through a cycle of deployment, user interaction, and periodic model updates. This differs from standard supervised learning frameworks, which focus on loss or regret minimization over a fixed sequence of prediction tasks. Motivated by this setting, we revisit the classical model of learning from equivalence queries, introduced by Angluin (1988). In this model, a learner repeatedly proposes hypotheses and, when a deployed hypothesis is inadequate, receives a counterexample. Under fully adversarial counterexample generation, however, the model can be overly pessimistic. In addition, most prior work assumes a full-information setting, where the learner also observes the correct label of the counterexample, an assumption that is not always natural. We address these issues by restricting the environment to a broad class of less adversarial counterexample generators, which we call symmetric. Informally, such generators choose counterexamples based only on the symmetric difference between the hypothesis and the target. This class captures natural mechanisms such as random counterexamples (Angluin and Dohrn, 2017; Bhatia, 2021; Chase, Freitag, and Reyzin, 2024), as well as generators that return the simplest counterexample according to a prescribed complexity measure. Within this framework, we study learning from equivalence queries under both full-information and bandit feedback. We obtain tight bounds on the number of learning rounds in both settings and highlight directions for future work. Our analysis combines a game-theoretic view of symmetric adversaries with adaptive weighting methods and minimax arguments.

For some hypothesis classes and input distributions, active agnostic learning needs exponentially fewer samples than passive learning; for other classes and distributions, it offers little to no improvement. The most popular algorithms for agnostic active learning express their performance in terms of a parameter called the disagreement coefficient, but it is known that these algorithms are inefficient on some inputs. We take a different approach to agnostic active learning, getting an algorithm that is competitive with the optimal algorithm for any binary hypothesis class $H$ and distribution $D_X$ over $X$. In particular, if any algorithm can use $m^*$ queries to get $O(η)$ error, then our algorithm uses $O(m^* \log |H|)$ queries to get $O(η)$ error. Our algorithm lies in the vein of the splitting-based approach of Dasgupta [2004], which gets a similar result for the realizable ($η= 0$) setting. We also show that it is NP-hard to do better than our algorithm's $O(\log |H|)$ overhead in general.