cs.LGNov 5, 2026

Using Transformers for Teaching and Learning via Symbolic Distillation of Neural A-life Agents

Authors: Shuwei Wang, Vadim Bulitko, Matthew R. G. Brown, Michael Youngblood, Ramon Lawrence, Roscoe Smith, Shinichi Nakagawa, William Yeoh

Organizations: Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, 116 Street and 85 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada · Filuta AI, 1606 Headway Circle, Austin, TX 78754, USA · Department of Computer Science, Data Science, University of British Columbia, 6200 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4, Canada · Department of Biology, University of Alberta, 116 Street and 85 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada · 

Abstract

Neural networks controlling behavior of A-life agents can evolve over multiple generations. While effective in making the agents survive, such networks are generally opaque to a human observer. Furthermore, the neural weights cannot be transferred between agents with different neural architectures. Distilling such neural networks into compact symbolic policies can help humans understand agent behavior in A-life. Additionally, it allows the agents to share their knowledge in a compact fashion, improving population-level learning. Distilling a neural policy into a symbolic policy is typically performed by searching the space of symbolic policies to find one that approximates the neural policy. However, even with a domain-specific language the space of policies can be large, necessitating incomplete stochastic search such as genetic algorithms. Yet the distillation remains computationally expensive. We propose to instead use a transformer pre-trained on readily available random percept-action data. Doing so speeds up distillation substantially. We derive the transformer architecture via a neural architecture search. Empirical results compare different distillation methods and the influence of the symbolic space on A-life population dynamics through self-reflection and teaching and learning.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Feb 24, 2026

SymTorch: Symbolic Distillation of Neural Networks

What mathematical functions do neural network components learn? Symbolic distillation addresses this question by expressing neural network components with interpretable, closed-form mathematical expressions that expose the functional structure learned during training. We develop symbolic distillation as a systematic, architecture-agnostic methodology, and release our approach as the open-source SymTorch package - a PySR-powered library built natively for the PyTorch ecosystem. Applying this methodology across diverse architectures, we find that SymTorch is successful in the automated discovery of physical laws. Specifically, our approach (1) recovers pairwise interaction forces from graph neural networks trained on empirical nn-body observations, (2) distills the exact closed-form PDE/ODE solutions of multiple physical systems, including the value of constants, from physics-informed neural networks trained on sparse data, and (3) uncovers the chaotic dynamics of the Lorenz system from high-dimensional data, ultimately outperforming the base neural network on downstream prediction tasks. We further demonstrate the utility of our framework for model interpretability by providing an optimized implementation of SLIME - a symbolic extension to the LIME explainability method. SLIME consistently outperforms LIME across predictive metrics across eight popular classification and regression benchmarks, while still providing an interpretable local symbolic model. Lastly, we investigate replacing transformer MLP layers with symbolic surrogates: replacing 1-7 layers with symbolic approximations yields 2-19% throughput improvements and up to 18.7% VRAM reduction, with the resulting hybrid models lying on the Pareto front of throughput versus perplexity among open-source LLMs of comparable scale.
Oct 2, 2026

Harness-Aware Distillation for Small Language Model Agents

Language model agents are deployed with a harness, the software around the model that manages its context, tools, and feedback. When such an agent is distilled into a smaller one, the harness stays in place, so the student mainly needs the teacher-specific abilities that the harness cannot provide, such as acting correctly on harness information. Standard distillation, however, imitates the teacher's full outputs and treats the harness as part of the input. We propose Harness-Aware Distillation (HAD), which focuses distillation on what the teacher adds beyond the harness. HAD complements on-policy distillation with two components: an action preference that contrasts the same teacher's actions with and without the harness information, scored after the student's own reasoning, and a validity check that drops preference pairs whose preferred action contradicts the harness records. We show that the contrast gives the student information that imitating the teacher alone cannot provide, and HAD needs no task rewards, success labels, or future information. Across multiple long-horizon agent benchmarks and models, HAD outperforms on-policy distillation baselines with the same fixed harness. Our analysis shows that HAD enters fewer unproductive loops and recovers from errors more often than the baselines, and suggests that it adaptively keeps learnable feedback in its weights while reading state information from the harness.
Oct 14, 2026

ActionOPD: Distilling Decisions, Not Tokens

Distilling capable language-model agents into smaller models requires aligning the student's behavior with the teacher's. This raises a fundamental question: at which states and at what granularity should this alignment be performed? Offline imitation provides dense but token-specific supervision and can suffer from state-distribution mismatch. Token-level on-policy distillation (OPD) addresses this mismatch but typically requires teacher token probabilities and compatible tokenization. We argue that semantic actions provide a natural unit of supervision for agent distillation. We introduce ActionOPD, an action-level on-policy distillation method motivated by maximizing expected teacher-action likelihood at student-encountered states. At each such state, ActionOPD samples actions from both the student and a black-box teacher, rewarding student actions according to their semantic agreement with the sampled teacher actions. Through policy optimization, ActionOPD aligns the student's action-level behavior with the teacher's decisions without requiring reproduction of teacher-written reasoning or access to teacher token probabilities. Training Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B with two teachers on diverse, curated tool-use tasks yields average gains of 3.3-6.9 percentage points across four out-of-distribution benchmarks. ActionOPD scales favorably with student size and teacher capability, without requiring the teacher and student to share a model family or tokenizer. On τ2τ^2-bench, ActionOPD achieves competitive performance against offline distillation and token-level OPD. We further explore Self-ActionOPD with a same-model teacher and privileged context. These results establish ActionOPD as a promising approach to agent distillation.