Organizations: School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China · Artificial Intelligence and Digital Finance Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province · Chengdu Everimaging Science and Technology Co., Ltd. · X-Humanoid Research Institute, Beijing, China · Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China · School of Management Science and Engineering, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China · School of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073 · Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Incubation Institute, Fudan University · Shanghai Academy of AI for Science, Shanghai, China · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
Multimodal self-supervised learning is challenged by heterogeneity, unequal informativeness, and complex information interactions across multimodal data sources such as images, text, audio, and tabular data. While contrastive methods effectively align shared semantics, they typically rely on strong multi-view redundancy assumptions, overlooking modality-specific and synergistic information, thus leading to suboptimal representations. We propose the Multimodal Information Interactions Bottleneck (MIIB), a principled framework grounded in Partial Information Decomposition that explicitly encodes redundant, unique, and synergistic information within multimodal interactions. MIIB employs a dual-path model architecture for modality-specific encoding and multimodal fusion, optimized using surrogate tractable entropy-based objectives that enforce minimal sufficient representations without requiring explicit mutual information estimation. By leveraging variational bounds and score-based entropy estimation, MIIB efficiently captures complex cross-modal interactions while suppressing superfluous information. Experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art multimodal self-supervised methods. Code is available at https://github.com/wanglingzaishi/MIIB.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: The process framework for multimodal representation learning organizes modality-specific learning and fusion as a sequential yet interdependent process.
Fig. 2: The overall architecture of MIIB. Given n input modalities X=(X1,…,Xn) , we first augment them to generate two views, X′ and X′′ . These views are encoded independently by modality-specific encoders and latent converters to extract latent features e1′…en′ and e1′′…en′′ , which provide unified embeddings for subsequent multimodal interaction. These features are then processed by two parallel Transformer streams. The Fusion Transformer processes concatenated multimodal features to produce fused representations Z′,Z′′ while processing individual modality features to yield modality-specific representations Z1′…Zn′ and Z1′′…Zn′′ . The Synergy Transformer operates on the concatenated multimodal features to model cross-modal interactions, producing synergistic representations Zs′ and Zs′′ . Finally, these representations are used to compute the modality-specific loss ( LMS ), modality fusion loss ( LMF ), and synergistic loss ( LSynergy ).
Model
Redundancy ↑
Uniqueness ↑
Synergy ↑
Cross † [ 5 ]
100.0
11.6
50.0
Cross+Self † [ 54 ]
99.7
86.9
50.0
FactorCL † [ 15 ]
99.8
62.5
46.5
CoMM [ 16 ]
99.9±0.06
86.8±2.99
71.4±3.47
MIIB (ours)
99.9±0.12
89.8±3.23
79.1±2.97
TABLE I: Linear probing accuracy (in %) of redundancy (shape), uniqueness (texture) and synergy (color and texture) on Trifeature dataset. † denotes results are from [ 16 ] .
Model
Regression
Classification
V&T EE ↓
MIMIC ↑
MOSI ↑
UR-FUNNY ↑
MUSTARD ↑
Average ∗ ↑
Cross † [ 5 ]
33.09±3.67
66.7±0.1
47.8±1.8
50.1±1.9
53.5±2.9
54.52
Cross+Self † [ 54 ]
7.56±0.31
65.49±0.0
49.0±1.1
59.9±0.9
53.9±4.0
57.07
FactorCL † [ 15 ]
10.82±0.56
67.3±0.0
51.2±1.6
60.5±0.8
55.80±0.9
58.7
CoMM [ 16 ]
7.96±2.13
66.4±0.4
63.7±2.5
63.3±0.5
64.4±1.1
64.45
MIIB (ours)
5.74±0.69
68.1±0.3
67.4±1.8
65.4±0.9
66.0±2.0
66.73
TABLE II: Linear probing MSE( ×10−4 ) for regression task and top-1 accuracy (in %) for classification tasks on Multibench. † denotes results are from [ 16 ] . ∗ denotes average is only selected from the results of classification tasks. Colored rows indicate fine-tuning results.
Model
#Mod.
V&T CP ↑
UR-FUNNY ↑
Cross [ 5 ]
2
86.3±0.25
50.1†
Cross+Self [ 54 ]
2
87.6±0.26
59.9†
CoMM [ 16 ]
2
87.0±1.58
63.3±0.51
MIIB (ours)
2
88.4±0.32
65.4±0.90
CMC † [ 61 ]
3
94.1
59.2
CoMM [ 16 ]
3
94.1±0.17
64.8±1.13
TABLE III: Linear probing top-1 accuracy (in %) for classification tasks on Vision&Touch and UR-FUNNY. † denotes results are from [ 16 ]
Model
Modalities
weighted-f1 ↑
macro-f1 ↑
SimCLR †△ [ 9 ]
V
40.35±0.23
27.99±0.33
CLIP † [ 5 ]
V
51.5
40.8
CLIP † [ 5 ]
L
51.0
43.0
CLIP † [ 5 ]
V+L
58.9
50.9
SLIP †△ [ 63 ]
V+L
56.54±0.19
47.35±0.27
CLIP †△ [ 5 ]
V+L
54.49±0.19
44.94±0.30
TABLE IV: Linear probing F1-score (weighted and macro) (in %) for MM-IMDb. △ indicates further training on unlabeled data. † denotes results are from [ 16 ] . For fair comparison, both CoMM and MIIB are implemented using the same pre-trained CLIP backbone. Colored rows indicate fine-tuning results.
Setting
Model
weighted-f1 ↑
macro-f1 ↑
Linear
CoMM [ 16 ]
61.29±0.73
53.79±0.22
MIIB (ours)
62.80±0.24
56.20±0.16
1%
CoMM [ 16 ]
60.68±0.31
53.66±0.40
MIIB (ours)
63.22±0.31
56.80±0.47
10%
CoMM [ 16 ]
61.60±0.41
54.48±0.72
MIIB (ours)
63.60±0.26
57.00±0.47
TABLE V: Performance comparison on the MM-IMDb dataset under different evaluation protocols. Results are reported in Macro-F1 and Weighted-F1 along with standard deviations. “Linear” denotes the best self-supervised linear probing results.
Model Setting
UR-FUNNY
MIMIC
w/o Synergy
5.78±2.05
1.34±0.80
w/ Synergy
7.32±1.98
2.54±1.26
Improvement
+1.54
+1.20
t-test
2.70
3.61
p -value
0.018
0.003
TABLE VI: InterSHAP analysis over 15 random seeds on two benchmark datasets. Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation together with paired t -tests.
Loss Weights
UR-FUNNY ↑
MUSTARD ↑
λ1
λ2
λ3
1
0
0
63.5±1.07
62.4±3.22
1
1
0
63.8±0.90
65.2±1.24
1
0
1
63.9±0.71
62.8±1.61
1
1
1
65.4±0.89
66.0±2.0
TABLE VII: Linear probing accuracy (in %) on UR-FUNNY and MUSTARD datasets under different combinations of loss functions. λ1 , λ2 , and λ3 denote the weights for LMF , LMS , and Lsynergy
Fig. 3: Parameter sensitivity analysis on the UR-FUNNY dataset with respect to the fusion penalty ( λfusion ), unimodality penalty ( λsingle ), and the synergy penalty ( λsynergy ).
Fig. 4: Parameter sensitivity analysis of the hyperparameter γ on the UR-FUNNY and MOSI datasets.
Dataset
Model
FLOPs
MACs
#Params
Total Training Time
UR-FUNNY
CoMM
0.15G
0.08G
7.11M
0.48h
MIIB
0.18G
0.09G
7.13M
0.54h
MMIMDb-clip
CoMM
36.27G
18.14G
236.5M
4.11h
MIIB
38.08G
19.04G
243.6M
4.31h
TABLE VIII: Comparative analysis of computational complexity and training efficiency. We report FLOPs, MACs, model size (#Params), and total training time. All measurements are conducted on a single NVIDIA 4090 GPU
Fig. 5: t-SNE visualization of unimodal and synergy representations on the MOSI (left) and MM-IMDb (right) datasets. The figure illustrates the distribution of unimodal representations (Modality 0, Modality 1) and the corresponding synergy representations in the learned embedding space.
A central objective in multimodal learning is to capture synergy: task-relevant information that arises only from the joint use of multiple modalities, and is not available from any single modality alone. While most approaches operate at the architectural level through larger or more complex fusion models, we propose a complementary axis: shaping the training objective itself. Standard training often emphasizes unimodal or redundant information, falling short on examples that require cross-modal reasoning. We formalize multimodal synergy through information theory and introduce the Synergistic Information Bottleneck (SynIB), a scalable objective that targets synergy directly. To prioritize learning synergy, SynIB motivates the model to predict accurately from all modalities while penalizing confidence when information from any modality is withheld. Alongside the standard task loss, the model runs forward passes with one modality masked at a time and is penalized for remaining confident, which would indicate reliance on unimodal cues rather than cross-modal interactions. We validate SynIB in two regimes. On synthetic XOR tasks where the ground-truth synergy is known by construction, standard training fails to recover it while SynIB does. On five real-world benchmarks, including three MultiBench affective tasks, Hateful Memes with CLIP-ViT and DeBERTa backbones, and a controllable irony extension of CREMA-D we introduce, SynIB improves accuracy on synergy-dependent examples by up to 7.8% and overall accuracy by up to 3.8%.
Konstantinos Kontras, Teodora Gagaleska, Thomas Strypsteen +4
Self-supervised multimodal representation learning has achieved remarkable success across diverse domains, yet capturing synergistic information remains challenging due to the complexity of cross-modal interactions. Unlike the shared information across individual modalities, synergy arises when task-relevant signals emerge only from the joint configuration of multiple modalities and cannot be recovered from any modality in isolation. This work focuses on how to preserve the information capacity for such synergistic signals in multimodal representations. The key observation is that synergistic information is reflected in higher-order statistical dependence among modalities, which provides a principled target for explicitly modeling joint interactions. Motivated by this insight, we propose Higher-order Representation and Information Learning (HRIL), which constructs an empirical cross-moment tensor over modality embeddings to represent multi-way interactions. HRIL employs Tucker decomposition to obtain a core tensor, complemented by a synergy-aware regularizer that prevents energy concentration and preserves higher-order coupling capacity for synergistic information capture. Experiments on the controlled synergy task and real-world benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over existing multimodal contrastive methods, with notable gains on tasks dominated by synergistic interactions. Code is released at https://github.com/brightest66/HRIL.
Qun Dai, Liangjian Wen, Jiang Duan +7
School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics · Artificial Intelligence and Digital Finance Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province · Chengdu Everimaging Science and Technology Co., Ltd +5
Multimodal learning seeks to integrate information from heterogeneous sources, where signals may be shared across modalities, specific to individual modalities, or emerge only through their interaction. While self-supervised multimodal contrastive learning has achieved remarkable progress, most existing methods predominantly capture redundant cross-modal signals, often neglecting modality-specific (unique) and interaction-driven (synergistic) information. Recent extensions broaden this perspective, yet they either fail to explicitly model synergistic interactions or learn different information components in an entangled manner, leading to incomplete representations and potential information leakage. We introduce COrAL, a principled framework that explicitly and simultaneously preserves redundant, unique, and synergistic information within multimodal representations. COrAL employs a dual-path architecture with orthogonality constraints to disentangle shared and modality-specific features, ensuring a clean separation of information components. To promote synergy modeling, we introduce asymmetric masking with complementary view-specific patterns, compelling the model to infer cross-modal dependencies rather than rely solely on redundant cues. Extensive experiments on synthetic benchmarks and diverse MultiBench datasets demonstrate that COrAL consistently matches or outperforms state-of-the-art methods while exhibiting low performance variance across runs. These results indicate that explicitly modeling the full spectrum of multimodal information yields more stable, reliable, and comprehensive embeddings.
Carolin Cissee, Raneen Younis, Zahra Ahmadi
Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany · Lower Saxony Center for AI and Causal Methods in Medicine (CAIMed), Hannover, Germany