cs.CLNov 5, 2026

Beyond K/V Caches: Cross-Model State Handoff in Hybrid Linear-Attention LLMs

Authors: Jiacheng Cai, Tao Zhang, Siqi Liang, Yun Dai, Ziqian Zeng

Organizations: South China University of Technology, China

Abstract

Production deployments often use different models to balance cost and quality through cascading, routing, and switching models during long conversations. Context accumulates across turns. Each switch requires the target to repeat prefill over this context. Existing methods transfer full-attention (FA) K/V caches across models. Hybrid linear-attention models also retain recurrent states (REC) and convolution histories (Conv). The interaction between Conv and REC complicates cross-model state transfer. Conv perturbations can change keys and values in recurrent layers and alter REC updates. Conv histories are overwritten, but changes in REC can still affect later outputs. More accurate REC reconstruction need not improve continuation. Building on this, we propose Hybrid State Transfer (HST) for all three state types. It uses structured REC maps and preserves history order during Conv alignment. We calibrate the adapters using the frozen target's outputs during continuation. FA cache map updates are merged offline. Across five benchmarks, Qwen3.5 4B→\rightarrow27B and 9B→\rightarrow27B achieve mean task retentions of 89.88% and 94.11%, respectively. With source caches already available, separate timing on synthetic 16K inputs yields handoff body speedups of 21.66×21.66\times and 21.91×21.91\times.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables7 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 7, 2026

LatentPort: Beyond KV Cache - Cross-Model Transfer of Recurrent Memory in Hybrid Language Models: A 4B-to-9B Hybrid-State Handoff Without Target Prefix Replay

Can one language model hand its live memory to another without the receiver rereading the context? We demonstrate useful persistent hybrid-state transfer across one architecture-matched Qwen3.5 4B-to-9B sibling pair. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstrated cross-model handoff of persistent recurrent inference state between differently sized hybrid language models without target prefix replay. Translated attention KV alone leaves a large gap; adding the Gated DeltaNet (GDN) persistent-state package lowers teacher-forced negative log-likelihood (NLL), the average next-token log-loss, by 0.747 nats/token (95% paired document bootstrap CI [0.6921, 0.8047]), improving all 64 PG19 documents. Direct recurrent and convolution reuse outperforms the tested learned GDN maps, consistent with partial functional compatibility of persistent-state coordinates. A fresh component factorial selects translated KV with direct recurrent and convolution state. An additional 434,176-parameter correction improves that base on 64 fresh web documents: continuation loss is 0.076 nats/token above native 9B (excess NLL), Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence is 0.022, and native context recovery (NCR) is 0.918. Corrected 9B significantly beats continued 4B inference while processing zero historical prefix tokens. Evidence covers one direction, one geometry-matched Base-model pair, and 4K teacher-forced continuation; the near-native gate failed, the 16K branch was not run, and free-generation equivalence and a general state interface remain unproven.
Sep 3, 2026

What Attention Recalls and Recurrence Controls in Hybrid Language Models

Hybrid language models combine attention with a fixed-size recurrent state, but the role of each channel remains unclear. We introduce two cache-level interventions. Split-prefill keeps only the KV cache or only the recurrent state from a prefilled context, then generates an answer. State-swap pairs the KV cache from one context with the recurrent state from another in a single forward pass. On Qwen3.5 and Falcon-H1, the two channels split sharply by function. Exact retrieval survives only through attention (64-98% of full accuracy) and collapses to zero through recurrence. Output language and persona reverse the pattern: both survive recurrence (70-80% and 3-5x) while KV-only drops to ~1% language accuracy. State-swap confirms this causally: the answer takes its value from the KV side and its language from the recurrent side. Recurrent-only generation also accepts words that were never in the context but share meaning or parts with seen items. Attention provides a lookup over what was said; the recurrent state shapes how the model says it next.
Aug 4, 2026

Cross-Model KV Cache Transfer in LLM Families: A Closed-Form Linear Mapping for Prefill Reuse

Production deployments often swap between different-sized models in a family for cost-quality cascading, mid-conversation switching, and routing, and each swap forces the receiver to repay the prefill from scratch. We propose cross-model KV cache transfer, where the receiver reuses the source's KV cache, skipping prefill. We find that cross-model KV has substantial linear structure across matched-KV pairs, where source and target share KV head count and per-head dimension. On Qwen3 14B->32B, one source layer explains 56% of variance in the target's keys and 32% in values, rising to 79% and 65% with multiple source layers. Building on this, we design a closed-form ridge mapper that operates per head and proceeds in three steps. First, for each target layer we select the top-k most predictive source layers and concatenate their KV as input. Second, we strip RoPE from the keys before mapping, so the fit is position-free and reusable across context lengths. Third, we fit ridge regression on a small calibration set of 500 FineWeb-Edu sequences of 1,024 tokens each. Surprisingly, across six pairs in three families, this linear mapper retains 73-98% of the receiver's standalone-prefill accuracy on four pairs, while two degrade sharply. A nonlinear MLP recovers up to +37 pp HellaSwag retention on the failures. The mapper runs 2.7-25x faster than re-prefill and remains stable across multi-turn handoff, making cross-model KV cache transfer practical.