Adaptive Gradient Methods
Overview
Adaptive gradient methods use information from current and past gradients to choose update sizes and directions, aiming to train more reliably than fixed-step gradient descent. Common approaches include momentum and learning-rate schedules, coordinate-wise methods such as Adam and AdaGrad, and block or matrix preconditioners such as Shampoo, often combined with orthogonalized updates. Researchers study their convergence and stability as well as their practical use in large language models, vision, scientific machine learning, and privacy-sensitive training. A central tension is that adaptivity can improve speed or robustness but costs memory and computation, and no optimizer consistently wins across tasks; guarantees and generalization depend on data, noise, geometry, and hyperparameter choices.
Latest papers
157 papers14 papers in the last four weeks, down 7% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.
A short proof of near-linear convergence of adaptive gradient descent under fourth-order growth and convexity
Evolution of Optimization Methods: Algorithms, Scenarios, and Evaluations
Muon: Boosting Muon via Adaptive Second-Moment Preconditioning
Delve into the Applicability of Advanced Optimizers for Multi-Task Learning
Deterministic Adam-Inspired Methods with Accelerated Convergence Rate
FlowAdam: Implicit Regularization via Geometry-Aware Soft Momentum Injection
Optimal Projection-Free Adaptive SGD for Matrix Optimization
Uniform a priori bounds and error analysis for the Adam stochastic gradient descent optimization method
Grokking as a Variance-Limited Phase Transition: Spectral Gating and the Epsilon-Stability Threshold
Spectral Gating'' mechanism that regulates the transition from memorization to generalization. We find that AdamW operates as a variance-gated stochastic system. Grokking is constrained by a stability condition: the generalizing solution resides in a sharp basin ($λ_{max}^H$) initially inaccessible under low-variance regimes. The delayed'' phase represents the accumulation of gradient variance required to lift the effective stability ceiling, permitting entry into this sharp manifold. Our ablation studies identify three complexity regimes: (1) Capacity Collapse (), where rank-deficiency prevents structural learning; (2) The Variance-Limited Regime (), where generalization waits for the spectral gate to open; and (3) Stability Override (), where memorization becomes dimensionally unstable. Furthermore, we challenge the "Flat Minima" hypothesis for algorithmic tasks, showing that isotropic noise injection fails to induce grokking. Generalization requires the anisotropic rectification unique to adaptive optimizers, which directs noise into the tangent space of the solution manifold.