Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers

Signed graphs are equipped with both positive and negative edge weights, encoding pairwise correlations as well as anti-correlations in data. A balanced signed graph is a signed graph with no cycles containing an odd number of negative edges. Laplacian of a balanced signed graph has eigenvectors that map via a simple linear transform to ones in a corresponding positive graph Laplacian, thus enabling reuse of spectral filtering tools designed for positive graphs. We propose an efficient computation method to learn a balanced signed graph Laplacian directly from data. Specifically, extending a previous linear programming (LP) based sparse inverse covariance estimation method called CLIME, we formulate a new LP problem for each Laplacian column $i$, where the linear constraints restrict weight signs of edges stemming from node $i$, so that nodes of same / different polarities are connected by positive / negative edges. We derive a feasible CLIME parameter $ρ_i$ for each sign-constrained column problem. We solve the LP problem efficiently by tailoring a sparse LP method based on ADMM. We theoretically prove that the row / column updates produce a non-increasing objective sequence, and show that the iterations are terminated in a finite number of steps. Extensive experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets show that our balanced graph learning method outperforms competing methods and enables reuse of spectral filters, wavelets, and graph neural nets (GNN) constructed for positive graphs.

Distributed empirical risk minimization (ERM) is often studied through two influential yet seemingly separate families of methods: CoCoA-type algorithms, derived from distributed dual coordinate ascent, and ADMM-type algorithms, derived from consensus and proximal splitting. In this paper, we investigate the connection of the two types of algorithms from a unified primal-dual perspective. We show that consensus ADMM, linearized consensus ADMM, two distributed proximal ADMM variants, and ridge-regularized CoCoA can all be written in a common update form involving a global primal variable and block dual variables. This reformulation makes several previously hidden connections explicit: For ridge-regularized ERM, CoCoA coincides with a particular proximal ADMM scheme at the level of the dual update. Moreover, consensus ADMM on the primal problem is equivalent to proximal ADMM on the dual problem under an explicit parameter mapping together with a sign reversal of the saddle objective; similar correspondences also hold for the linearized variants. These results indicates that the ADMM-type algorithms, when fine tuned, performs at least as good as CoCoA, under ridge regularized ERM problems. The unified view also yields a natural primal-dual gap stopping criterion for consensus ADMM and a unified $O(1/T)$ ergodic convergence analysis for the ADMM-type methods. Experiments on synthetic regression problems and real SVM datasets support the predicted relationships, clarify the role of tuning parameters, and show that suitably tuned ADMM variants can outperform CoCoA in the ridge-regularized setting.