Doubly Robust Estimation

Beyond conditional average treatment effects, treatments may impact the entire outcome distribution in covariate-dependent ways, for example, by altering the variance or tail risks for specific subpopulations. We propose a novel estimand to capture such conditional distributional treatment effects, and develop a doubly robust estimator that is minimax optimal in the local asymptotic sense. Using this, we develop a test for the global homogeneity of conditional potential outcome distributions that accommodates discrepancies beyond the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), has provably valid type 1 error, and is consistent against fixed alternatives---the first test, to our knowledge, with such guarantees in this setting. We then provide a test that aggregates evidence across a grid of kernel-bandwidth choices. Furthermore, we derive exact closed-form expressions for two natural discrepancies (including the MMD), and provide a computationally efficient, permutation-free algorithm for our test.

When outcome data are expensive or onerous to collect, scientists increasingly substitute predictions from machine learning and AI models for unlabeled cases, a process which has consequences for downstream statistical inference. While recent methods provide valid uncertainty quantification under independent sampling, real-world applications involve missing at random (MAR) labeling and spatial dependence. For inference in this setting, we propose a doubly robust estimator with cross-fit nuisances. We show that cross-fitting induces fold-level correlation that distorts spatial variance estimators, producing unstable or overly conservative confidence intervals. To address this, we propose a jackknife spatial heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) variance correction that separates spatial dependence from fold-induced noise. Under standard identification and dependence conditions, the resulting intervals are asymptotically valid. Simulations and benchmark datasets show substantial improvement in finite-sample calibration, particularly under MAR labeling and clustered sampling.

We study off-policy evaluation in the setting of contextual bandits, where we aim to evaluate a new policy using historical data that consists of contexts, actions and received rewards. This historical data typically does not faithfully represent action distribution of the new policy accurately. A common approach, inverse probability weighting (IPW), adjusts for these discrepancies in action distributions. However, this method often suffers from high variance due to the probability being in the denominator. The doubly robust (DR) estimator reduces variance through modeling reward but does not directly address variance from IPW. In this work, we address the limitation of IPW by proposing a Nonparametric Weighting (NW) approach that constructs weights using a nonparametric model. Our NW approach achieves low bias like IPW but typically exhibits significantly lower variance. To further reduce variance, we incorporate reward predictions -- similar to the DR technique -- resulting in the Model-assisted Nonparametric Weighting (MNW) approach. The MNW approach yields accurate value estimates by explicitly modeling and mitigating bias from reward modeling, without aiming to guarantee the standard doubly robust property. Extensive empirical comparisons show that our approaches consistently outperform existing techniques, achieving lower variance in value estimation while maintaining low bias.

Continuous and efficient experimentation is key to the practical success of user-facing applications on the web, both through online A/B-tests and off-policy evaluation. Despite their shared objective -- estimating the incremental value of a treatment -- these domains often operate in isolation, utilising distinct terminologies and statistical toolkits. This paper bridges that divide by establishing a formal equivalence between their canonical variance reduction methods. We prove that the standard online Difference-in-Means estimator is mathematically identical to an off-policy Inverse Propensity Scoring estimator equipped with an optimal (variance-minimising) additive control variate. Extending this unification, we demonstrate that widespread regression adjustment methods (such as CUPED, CUPAC, and ML-RATE) are structurally equivalent to Doubly Robust estimation. This unified view extends our understanding of commonly used approaches, and can guide practitioners and researchers working on either class of problems.

We study adaptive estimation and inference in ill-posed linear inverse problems defined by conditional moment restrictions. Existing regularized estimators such as Regularized DeepIV (RDIV) require prior knowledge of the smoothness of the nuisance function, typically encoded by a beta source condition to tune their regularization parameters. In practice, this smoothness is unknown, and misspecified hyperparameters can lead to suboptimal convergence or instability. We introduce a discrepancy-principle-based framework for adaptive hyperparameter selection that automatically balances bias and variance without relying on the unknown smoothness parameter. Our framework applies to both RDIV (Li et al. [2024]) and the Tikhonov Regularized Adversarial Estimator (TRAE) (Bennett et al. [2023a]) and achieves the same rates in both weak and strong metrics. Building on this, we construct a fully adaptive doubly robust estimator for linear functionals that attains the optimal rate of the better-conditioned primal or dual problem, providing a practical, theoretically grounded approach for adaptive inference in ill-posed econometric models.