Hard Negative Mining

Embedding-based retrieval (EBR) for large-scale e-commerce search faces three intertwined challenges: graded (non-binary) relevance where engagement signals are noisy and intent-varying while business relevance guidelines admit acceptable-but-not-exact matches, false negatives in hard sample mining, and unstable similarity score separability across relevance levels, the last of which complicates hybrid search score fusion and downstream ranking. We propose Mine and Refine, a two-stage contrastive training framework that addresses all three. A lightweight LLM, fine-tuned with engagement-driven audit, serves as a guideline-aligned scalable labeler throughout training. Stage 1 establishes a robust global embedding space via label-aware supervised contrastive learning; Stage 2 mines hard samples, re-annotates them with the LLM labeler to mitigate spurious negatives, and refines the model through a multi-level extension of circle loss that enforces margin-controlled separation across relevance levels. Deployed in production e-commerce search across multiple product verticals, the approach delivers statistically significant lifts in user engagement and gross order value, and substantially improves retrieval and end-to-end relevance metrics.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in recommender systems, where supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is commonly used for adaptation. Subsequent studies further introduce preference learning to incorporate negative samples into the training process. However, existing methods rely on sequence-level, offline-generated negatives, making them less discriminative and informative when adapting LLMs to recommendation tasks with large negative item spaces. To address these challenges, we propose ILRec, a novel preference fine-tuning framework for LLM-based recommendation, leveraging self-hard negative signals extracted from intermediate layers to improve preference learning. Specifically, we identify self-hard negative tokens from intermediate layers as fine-grained negative supervision that dynamically reflects the model's preference learning process. To effectively integrate these signals into training, we design a two-stage framework comprising cross-layer preference optimization and cross-layer preference distillation, enabling the model to jointly discriminate informative negatives and enhance the quality of negative signals from intermediate layers. In addition, we introduce a lightweight collaborative filtering model to assign token-level rewards for negative signals, mitigating the risk of over-penalizing false negatives. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate ILRec's effectiveness in enhancing the performance of LLM-based recommender systems.

Self-evolving agents improve their performance on long-horizon tasks by learning from their own interactions with an environment. A common approach uses the resulting failed trajectories as negatives for preference training. However, collecting an agent's own failures does not ensure that they provide informative supervision for further improvement. Obvious failures may be easy to reject without learning to identify errors in more plausible attempts. These plausible but incorrect trajectories can serve as hard negatives, helping agents learn to distinguish successful behavior from failures with less obvious errors. To enable agents to generate and learn from such informative negatives, we propose a co-evolving framework that couples a target agent's self-improvement with a failure agent trained to generate hard negatives. The failure agent learns exclusively from both agents' failed trajectories to generate higher-reward failures, which the target agent uses as negatives for preference training. As the target policy improves, its failures provide new training data for the failure agent. The updated failure agent, in turn, provides new negatives for target training, allowing negative generation to adapt alongside the target policy. Across online shopping, scientific reasoning, and interactive SQL querying, our framework improves average task reward by 5.7 over the baseline. These results demonstrate the value of learning to generate and use informative failures for agent self-improvement. We will make our code publicly available.

Contrastive learning relies on informative negatives to shape the representation space, yet obtaining hard negatives is costly, often requiring large batch sizes or extensive memory banks. We propose SynCo (Synthetic negatives in Contrastive learning), an approach that synthesizes hard negatives directly in the representation space from cached queue embeddings, with no additional forward passes or input-space processing. We find that six lightweight synthesis strategies, exhaustively covering the geometric, stochastic, and adversarial perturbation families, consistently improve learned representations at negligible computational cost. Although applicable to any InfoNCE-based contrastive objective, we demonstrate SynCo within the MoCo framework. On ImageNet ILSVRC-2012 linear evaluation at 200 epochs, SynCo yields improvements of +0.4% over MoCo-v2 and +1.0% over MoCHi. Unlike MoCHi, which degrades at extended pretraining schedules (underperforming MoCo-v2 by 2.4% at 800 epochs), SynCo does not: with a simple synthetic negative schedule, performance improves by +0.5% over MoCo-v2 at 800 epochs. SynCo also transfers well to a range of downstream tasks.