Multiple Centrality Measures

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful models for handling attributed graphs in tasks such as classification, link prediction, and community detection, as they enable the aggregation of information from both structural and semantic sources. However, progress in community detection is hindered by the lack of high-quality datasets, since ground-truth community labels are often unavailable and most algorithms proposed in recent literature rely on the same benchmark datasets for model training and evaluation. To address this issue, attributed random graph generators are commonly employed to create synthetic graphs for assessing the strengths and limitations of GNN-based models. Nevertheless, most existing generators rely heavily on power-law degree distributions, despite recent evidence indicating that scale-free networks are rare, particularly in social network contexts. Moreover, state-of-the-art attributed graph generators provide limited flexibility, as they do not allow users to construct communities with varying densities, degree distributions, and sub-community structures. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the Synthetic Community-Aware Attributed Graph Generator (SynCo), a graph generation algorithm that allows users to control the node degree distribution and sub-community structure. We evaluate SynCo across three different tasks: graph mimicking, hyperparameter evaluation, and node clustering tuning. The results show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in synthetic graph generation and data augmentation, while preserving the original distributions of duplicated and augmented datasets, as confirmed by statistical tests well know in literature. We also demonstrate the ability of SynCo to generate nodes in large scale, up to 2.1 million nodes.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) suffer from two fundamental limitations: over-smoothing, where node representations become indistinguishable with depth, and over-squashing, where long-range information is compressed through limited message-passing channels. Existing metrics such as Dirichlet energy provide global characterizations of over-smoothing but lack the resolution to analyze node-level behavior and guide architectural improvements. In this paper, we propose LEED (Local Embedding Evolution Distance), a novel local metric that quantifies over-smoothing by tracking the evolution of individual node embeddings across layers. By operating at the node level, LEED enables fine-grained analysis of representation dynamics during training, revealing heterogeneous over-smoothing patterns that are invisible to global energy-based measures. This locality induces informative node importance scores, interpreted as embedding-driven centrality measures. We leverage LEED to design a more efficient strategy for virtual node selection. Unlike existing approaches that depend on multiple heuristic centrality measures, our method uses LEED as a unique criterion to guide the construction of Local Virtual Nodes to mitigate over-squashing. Experiments show that LEED provides more informative diagnostics than Dirichlet energy while preserving global evaluation, and enables more effective virtual node integration, improving GNN performance across datasets.

Node ranking is a fundamental problem in graph information retrieval, measuring the relative importance of nodes and supporting a wide range of applications such as influence analysis, recommendation, and graph-based retrieval augmented generation. However, exact computation of graph-based ranking measures is often computationally prohibitive at scale. Existing GNN-based ranking methods provide scalable approximations, but they are typically tailored to individual ranking criteria and require retraining for each downstream task, which limits their transferability and efficiency. Recent graph pre-training approaches aim to enable knowledge transfer across tasks, yet their learning objectives are largely misaligned with node ranking, resulting in suboptimal adaptability to ranking-oriented applications. To address these limitations, we propose PreGress, the first ranking-native pre-training and prompting framework for supporting a wide range of node ranking tasks. PreGress performs multi-task pre-training using our carefully designed objectives, including degree centrality prediction and attribute reconstruction, to jointly capture structural and attribute information. To support heterogeneous ranking criteria, we design lightweight, task-specific prompt modules that adapt a frozen ranking backbone to downstream tasks without full retraining. Experiments on six public graphs and two real-world query-to-item benchmarks---Yelp2018 and MovieLens-100K---together with a controlled five-criterion graph-access study demonstrate strong ranking quality with low task-specific state overhead.

Next-destination prediction in continuous-time dynamic graphs (CTDGs) commonly ranks an observed interaction against sampled negative destinations. The resulting score is conditional on both the negative distribution and the number of candidates chosen by the researcher. We show that a non-uniform negative distribution changes the Bayes-optimal ranking, while even a finite candidate set drawn uniformly can destabilize model rankings and measured module effects. Time-varying source-destination history membership and model operations that use this information directly transmit the sampler's influence to the evaluation score. We examine this mechanism using a factorial evaluation of repeated and new positives against seen and unseen negatives, a minimal scorer based solely on pair-history membership, and controlled representation interventions. Across six models on LastFM, MOOC, Reddit, and Wikipedia, at least one model pair changes relative order between the expected Uniform-20 metric and the full catalog on three of the four datasets. The measured effect of the same module also changes in magnitude and direction with the candidate-set size and training objective. These results establish that model-superiority and ablation conclusions from sampled-negative benchmarks are conditional on the stated candidate configuration. All-entity ranking evaluates every destination in a fixed catalog, eliminating negative-selection freedom and sampling variation while retaining the original CTDG scorer. We therefore recommend all-entity ranking as the primary evidence for architecture comparisons on CTDG benchmarks with an enumerable, fixed destination catalog.

Context compression discards most of a document before a language model reads it, and is normally evaluated by downstream task accuracy - which makes another model the judge of what mattered. Naturalistic social highlighting offers a non-circular reference: many people independently marking passages on the same page. But the obvious metric, the fraction of crowd-marked sentences a compressor keeps, is confounded twice: crowd marks are front-loaded and crowd-marked sentences are longer, so any method favouring early or long sentences scores well regardless of readers. We remove both by matching each marked sentence against unmarked sentences of the same document at equal relative depth and equal within-document length rank, and we calibrate every estimator on synthetic nulls built from position and length alone - a step that matters, since depth-only stratification returns a false positive on 20-36% of nulls containing no effect. On 120 web documents (at least 12 independent readers each), a language-model importance ranking keeps 38.4% of crowd-marked sentences against 19.9% of their matched neighbours: an enrichment of +0.196 [+0.148, +0.239], at p = 0.0005 under an exact randomization test that assumes nothing about clustering, and replicated cross-vendor. Naive truncation, whose keep rule is position, correctly falls to +0.003. To give the number a scale: scored identically, on the same budget, against a crowd label recomputed to exclude them, a single human reader reaches +0.182 - indistinguishable from GPT-5.4 (+0.002 [-0.081, +0.088]) and below Claude Opus 5. Classical methods are not null - Luhn's 1958 heuristic reaches +0.088 - so reader selection is partly recoverable by counting words; conditioning additionally on lexical centrality removes only 0.010, so the agreement is not centrality. We also report that a claim in our own prior work does not reproduce on this corpus.

Unsupervised Graph Domain Adaptation (UGDA) aims to facilitate knowledge transfer from a labeled source graph to an unlabeled target graph by mitigating cross-domain distribution shifts. Existing methods primarily focus on node-level feature alignment in latent spaces, relying on the implicit assumption that all source nodes contribute positively to the alignment. However, this assumption often fails because a node's semantic information is intrinsically coupled with its topological graph structure. Due to structural shifts, source nodes with severe structural deviations (e.g., structural outliers) lack semantic counterparts in the target graph, and forcing alignment on them introduces severe noise and causes negative transfer. To bridge this gap, we argue that selective source node utilization is superior to full-graph training, thereby shifting the research paradigm from feature-level alignment to data-level refinement. To this end, we propose Source Node Influence Pruning (SNIP), a novel model-agnostic, data-centric refinement framework. Specifically, SNIP quantifies the structural discrepancy between individual source nodes and the target domain by integrating multiple centrality measures, assigning each source node an influence score. A rank-based normalization mechanism is further employed to eliminate scale variations across different measures, allowing SNIP to effectively identify and filter out structurally incompatible nodes with low influence scores. As a plug-and-play method, SNIP constructs a refined "sub-source" graph that is inherently more beneficial for subsequent alignment. Comprehensive experiments across eight transfer scenarios on five real-world datasets demonstrate that SNIP consistently outperforms competitive baselines and significantly enhances adaptation performance, validating the superiority of selective node utilization over full-graph training.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) provide a learning-based framework for approximating graph quantities that are expensive to compute exactly. This paper investigates GNNs for scalable approximation of betweenness and closeness centrality, formulated as a node-ranking problem. Exact centrality values are used as supervision, and ranking quality is evaluated using Kendall's tau rank correlation. We study whether message-passing GNNs can learn transferable structural representations across different graph topologies rather than only fitting the distribution used during training. On unseen Erdos renyi graphs, the proposed models achieve tau = 0.851 for betweenness and tau = 0.894 for closeness. A large-scale betweenness model trained on graphs with N = 5,000 nodes achieves tau = 0.938, demonstrating scalability. Mixed-distribution training on Erdos renyi, Barabasi-Albert, and Gaussian Random Partition graphs improves betweenness transfer across graph families. In contrast, closeness centrality remains more sensitive to community-structured graphs and shows reduced transfer to real-world topologies. Finally, GNN inference achieves up to a 97.7x speedup over exact computation. These results show that mixed-distribution training can improve structural transfer in GNN-based centrality approximation, while identifying closeness centrality's sensitivity to topology as an open challenge.

While the growing availability of image data has driven significant advances, labeling datasets remains costly and time-consuming. Therefore, semi-supervised approaches such as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), which learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, have emerged as a promising solution. One of the primary challenges in applying GCNs to image classification is graph construction, since, unlike in citation networks or similar domains, images typically do not come with a predefined structural representation. For visual data, most studies construct graphs based on the similarity between feature vectors from pretrained deep learning backbones, typically by employing kNN or reciprocal kNN algorithms. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capability in capturing high-level semantics, their integration with GCNs for image classification remains underexplored. Aiming to fill this gap, our approach uses a Vision Language Model (VLM) to generate textual image descriptions, which are then processed by an LLM to estimate semantic similarity scores between connected images. These scores guide the pruning of edges in kNN and reciprocal kNN graphs, filtering out semantically irrelevant neighbors. Experimental results reveal that leveraging LLMs for graph refinement can improve classification accuracy, particularly for kNN graphs and some backbones. The source code is publicly available at http://gcnllm.lucasvalem.com.

We propose NetinfoGC, a framework for graph classification that extends the Network Usable Information (NUI) paradigm to graph-level learning. Unlike conventional graph neural network approaches that rely on end-to-end training of black-box embeddings, NetinfoGC constructs a family of permutation-invariant graph representations derived from propagation-based mechanisms and classical structural descriptors, including graph centrality measures. To evaluate representation quality, we introduce a training-free NUI estimation procedure based on clustering consistency with ground-truth labels, providing a proxy for task-relevant information without supervised learning. We further exploit the same representations using sparse-group LASSO regularization, enabling automatic selection of informative structural descriptors while suppressing redundant ones. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that classical centrality measures are highly competitive with learned propagation-based representations, and in several cases yield superior performance. Moreover, we observe a strong correlation between estimated NUI and downstream classification accuracy, validating NUI as an effective measure of representation utility. Overall, NetinfoGC provides a unified and interpretable framework for evaluating and exploiting graph representations without requiring end-to-end neural training.

Algorithms have become central to scientific research in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). Although algorithm mentions in papers are often used to indicate popularity and influence, existing studies usually evaluate individual algorithms in isolation and pay limited attention to the collective influence formed through their interconnections. This study constructs large-scale algorithm co-occurrence networks in natural language processing (NLP) based on the full text of academic papers and investigates algorithm influence from a network perspective. Using deep learning models, we extract algorithm entities and build overall, cumulative, and annual co-occurrence networks. We analyze their structural characteristics and apply multiple centrality measures to assess the group influence of algorithms across the whole field and over time. The results show that algorithm networks display typical features of complex networks, with increasingly dense connections developing over approximately two decades. Classic, high-performing algorithms and those located at the intersections of different research periods tend to have high popularity, control, centrality, and balanced influence. When the influence of an algorithm declines, it usually loses its core network position first, followed by weaker associations with other algorithms. This study is the first large-scale analysis of algorithm co-occurrence networks. Covering more than four decades of academic publications, it provides a temporal and structural view of algorithm influence and offers a foundation for future research on networks linking algorithms, scholars, and tasks.

A social highlighter's most useful signal -- which passages a crowd of readers marks -- exists only for documents people have already read. Can the aggregate crowd salience of a document be predicted from its text before its marks accumulate? Prior work on this data found that zero-shot language models recover highlight locations worse than a trivial lead (position) baseline, so we ask whether a model trained on the highlight corpus can beat that baseline. Using a pre-registered ladder of models and a by-document cluster bootstrap, we find a small but robust edge: a logistic ranker over sentence embeddings and positional/contextual features beats the lead baseline by +0.044 average precision (95% CI [+0.029, +0.058]; clears a pre-registered margin delta=0.03 in 97% of resamples, and stable across pipeline re-runs). Two unsupervised extractive baselines (centroid, LexRank-style centrality) lose to lead, and the trained model beats them by +0.108, so the edge is not recovered by generic unsupervised proxies -- it reflects learning from real reader marks. In product terms, precision@3 rises from 0.25 to 0.39 (+55% relative) and the model beats lead on 69% of documents. An ablation attributes the edge to the raw embedding (+0.014) and training augmentation (+0.010), each with a positive CI. The edge is not a temporal-generalization failure, and we find no evidence that content drift or near-duplicate leakage explains it. A standardized regression shows the advantage is governed mainly by document popularity (lower popularity, larger edge) and by label reliability. It nearly vanishes only on the most popular content; there it is the lead baseline that strengthens, not the model that weakens. Because our evaluation conditions on documents that eventually accumulated readers, these results are a retrospective cold-start simulation.

The performance of modern language models depends critically on pretraining data composition. Yet existing data selection methods rely on auxiliary classifiers for document scoring or mixture optimization, adding computational overhead and dependence on labeled data. We propose WebGraphMix, a lightweight data selection framework that computes structural centrality scores over the Common Crawl host-level web graph and uses them to vary the proportion of central versus peripheral documents in the pretraining mixture. We hypothesize that central hosts expose models to reusable abstractions, while peripheral hosts encode specialized, long-tail knowledge. WebGraphMix computes centrality scores efficiently at web scale, requiring no model training, labeled data, or downstream supervision. We integrate WebGraphMix into the DataComp-LM pipeline and train models at 400M and 1B parameter scales with 8B and 28B tokens respectively, evaluating on 23 tasks ranging from factual knowledge to symbolic reasoning. Our experiments show that central and peripheral web regions encode complementary capabilities. Mixture combining both at a ratio of 1:1 achieves 41.4% on average, compared to 39.8% for uniform sampling. Combining structural scores with document-level quality classifier scores further improves performance to 43.8%. These findings demonstrate that web graph topology is a meaningful axis for pretraining data curation, capturing information that is largely orthogonal to existing content-based approaches.

Unsupervised term discovery involves segmenting unlabelled speech into word- or syllable-like units and clustering these into a lexicon of candidate types. True lexicons follow a Zipfian distribution, yet the dominant centre-based clustering approach -- K-means -- produces a more uniform distribution due to an inductive bias toward spherical clusters. In this paper we revisit graph-based clustering as a bottom-up alternative, where segment embeddings are connected by pairwise similarity and partitioned using the Leiden algorithm. We show that graph clustering substantially outperforms centre-based approaches (K-means, GMM, BIRCH) in both word- and syllable-level lexicon discovery across three languages, producing more Zipf-like distributions. Another bottom-up approach, agglomerative clustering with average linkage, also performs well, although it is computationally less efficient and allows for less control over the resulting distribution. Our work calls into question the dominance of centre-based clustering for term discovery, and promotes graph clustering as an attractive alternative.

Community detection is a fundamental problem in the analysis of complex networks. It has applications across social, biological, and financial domains. Traditional algorithms such as Louvain, LPA, and modularity optimization often require manual parameter tuning. They also suffer from inaccurate cluster center selection and struggle with scalability. To address these challenges, we propose Automatic Laplacian Centrality Means (ALCMeans), a novel community detection algorithm. ALCMeans combines Laplacian energy-based automatic center identification with DeepWalk embeddings for robust node representation. Unlike existing Laplacian-based and clustering methods, ALCMeans eliminates the need to predefine the number of communities, enhances cluster center selection using structural importance, and leverages representation learning for more accurate and stable assignments. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate 10 to 20 percent higher NMI and ARI scores compared to Louvain, Newman-Girvan, LPA, Fast-Greedy, and a recent GNN-based competitor (MAGI, KDD 2024). Additional evaluations with modularity and F1-scores confirm the superiority of ALCMeans. Ablation studies highlight the critical contributions of each component. Despite its reliance on DeepWalk parameters and increased runtime relative to lightweight heuristics, ALCMeans consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods. This makes it a promising tool for real-world network analysis.

Self-consistency improves large language models by sampling multiple reasoning paths and selecting the most frequent answer, but majority voting often fails to recover correct answers that are already present among the samples. We address this limitation with Ranking-Improved Self-Consistency (RISC), which reformulates answer selection in self-consistency as a ranking problem. Instead of relying on a single uncertainty or confidence signal, RISC uses a lightweight LambdaRank model to score candidate answers with five carefully designed features that capture answer frequency, semantic centrality, and reasoning-trace consistency. We evaluate RISC on three datasets under a range of test-time budgets. Across datasets, RISC consistently achieves a better accuracy-efficiency trade-off than standard self-consistency and strong baselines, with particularly large gains on question answering benchmarks. Further analysis shows that the proposed features are individually useful and, more importantly, complementary, highlighting the value of learning to combine multiple informative signals for test-time answer selection.

Neighbor embedding algorithms reveal correlations in high-dimensional data by constructing an equivalent graph representation in a lower-dimensional space. An increasingly popular algorithm is Uniform Manifold Learning and Projection (UMAP), which uses algebraic topology to map distances between the two spaces. While it works well on many types of data sets, UMAP has trouble adding out-of-sample points to a pre-existing mapping. In particular, UMAP often places new points on the periphery of the found clusters, rather than in their interiors with their correlated neighbors. Here, we overcome this ``repulsion effect'' by optimizing pairwise interactions within the original k-nearest-neighbor graph. Moreover, we show that parameterizing UMAP obtains better embeddings than non-parametric algorithms, particularly as the data gets more complex (e.g., medical images). We also show that the repulsion effect is naturally mitigated when a parameterized UMAP is employed to embed the data. We characterize different UMAP approaches using trustworthiness, nearest neighbor classifiers, and by analyzing attractive and repulsive forces in the embeddings.

Selecting a clustering algorithm and its hyperparameters without labels is a common difficulty in engineering machine learning pipelines that work with unsupervised analysis of sensor, image, or process data. Clustering validation indices (CVIs) provide internal scores for ranking candidate clusterings, but most popular CVIs are built from Euclidean compactness and separation terms and so tend to favour compact, convex partitions. Their performance is known to degrade on non convex, irregular, or variable density data, where kernel transformations or alternative distance measures are typically used at the cost of additional tuning and computation. This paper introduces the Central Description Length (CDL) clustering validation index. CDL uses the observed within cluster compactness, the estimated cluster centers, and the estimated cluster covariances to compute a probabilistic upper bound on the description length associated with the unobservable true cluster centers. The bound condenses intra cluster compactness and centroid displacement into a single computable quantity and is evaluated on the partition produced by any clustering algorithm. The implementation uses only observable quantities (the data, the partition, the estimated centers, and the estimated covariances) and does not use ground truth labels. On synthetic benchmarks with non convex and arbitrary shape clusters, CDL-CVI selected the reference number of clusters more often and reached higher Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) values than the conventional CVIs we tested, without an additional kernel preprocessing stage. On image benchmarks (MNIST, CIFAR-10, STL-10) clustered from frozen unsupervised embeddings, CDL-CVI returned cluster numbers close to the reference class counts across K-means, DBSCAN, and spectral clustering in the reported trials.

The exponential growth of data has intensified the gap between the availability of unlabeled data and the high cost of manual annotation. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising solution, as they exploit relational structures and learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, performing semi-supervised learning. A crucial component of many of these models is degree-based normalization, which influences message propagation but typically assumes uniform importance among neighboring nodes. In image classification, graphs are usually constructed from feature similarity, where treating all neighbors equally may overlook important variations in relevance. Motivated by this gap, we propose GRaNDe (Gaussian Rank-based Neighborhood Degree). This novel degree measure integrates neighborhood ranking with Gaussian distance weighting to better capture node importance. Experiments on five public image classification datasets show consistent accuracy improvements and competitive or superior results compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Identifying critical nodes in complex networks is a fundamental task in graph mining. Yet, methods addressing an all-or-nothing coverage mechanics in a bipartite dependency network, a graph with two types of nodes where edges represent dependency relationships across the two groups only, remain largely unexplored. We formalize the CriticalSet problem: given an arbitrary bipartite graph modeling dependencies of items on contributors, identify the set of k contributors whose removal isolates the largest number of items. We prove that this problem is NP-hard and requires maximizing a supermodular set function, for which standard forward greedy algorithms provide no approximation guarantees. Consequently, we model CriticalSet as a coalitional game, deriving a closed-form centrality, ShapleyCov, based on the Shapley value. This measure can be interpreted as the expected number of items isolated by a contributor's departure. Leveraging these insights, we propose MinCov, a linear-time iterative peeling algorithm that explicitly accounts for connection redundancy, prioritizing contributors who uniquely support many items. Extensive experiments on synthetic and large-scale real datasets, including a Wikipedia graph with over 250 million edges, reveal that MinCov and ShapleyCov significantly outperform traditional baselines. Notably, MinCov achieves near-optimal performance, within 0.02 AUC of a Stochastic Hill Climbing metaheuristic, while remaining several orders of magnitude faster.

Mental imagery vividness is a stable individual trait, yet whether imagined scenarios share relational structure across human and synthetic large language model (LLM) populations remains unknown. We applied psychological network analysis to vividness ratings from two validated questionnaires: the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ-2) and the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (PSIQ), across geographically and linguistically distinct human samples (Florida, Poland, and London; total N = 2,743) and six large language models (LLMs; Gemma3-12B/27B, their quantization-aware counterparts, Llama3.3-70B, and Llama4-16x17B). Imagination networks were constructed as regularized partial correlation graphs, with node centrality and community structure compared across populations using Pearson correlations and the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI). Human networks showed robust cross-population centrality correlations for expected influence, strength, and closeness (r = 0.31-0.93), and community detection recovered clusters aligned with VVIQ-2 scene contexts (ARI = 0.27-0.40) and PSIQ sensory modalities (ARI = 0.87-1.0). Betweenness centrality was unstable across all populations, consistent with its sensitivity to individual experiential history. LLMs failed to replicate human network structure: LLM-human centrality correlations were weak and largely non-significant after correction, and most LLM configurations produced degenerate single-cluster topologies (median ARI = 0). This failure was consistent across model architectures, parameter scales (12B-272B), and conversational conditions. We posit that these findings may be driven by human imagination networks reflecting memory organization accumulated through embodied experience, a representational structure that linguistic training alone does not reproduce regardless of model scale and conversational memory.

Background: Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) are widely used in health and environmental research to represent hypothesized causal structures underlying complex problems. However, as qualitative and static representations, CLDs are limited in their ability to support dynamic analysis and inform intervention strategies. We propose Diagrams-to-Dynamics (D2D), a method for converting CLDs into exploratory system dynamics models in the absence of empirical data. With minimal user input - following a protocol to label variables as stocks, flows or auxiliaries, and constants - D2D utilizes the structural information already encoded in CLDs, namely the existence and polarity of causal connections, to simulate hypothetical interventions and explore potentially influential places to intervene, known as 'leverage points,' under uncertainty. Results: D2D helps distinguish between high- and low-ranked leverage points. We compare D2D to a calibrated system dynamics model constructed from the same CLD and variable labels. D2D showed greater consistency with the calibrated model than did static network centrality analysis, while also providing uncertainty estimates and guidance for future data collection. Conclusions: The D2D method is implemented in an open-source Python package and a web-based application to support further testing and to lower the barrier to dynamic modeling for researchers working with CLDs. Future studies could help establish the approach's utility across a broad range of cases and domains.