Reuse

This work addresses the challenge of disseminating reusable artificial intelligence (AI) models accompanied by AI documentation (a.k.a., AI model cards). The work is motivated by the large number of trained AI models that are not reusable due to the lack of (a) AI documentation and (b) the temporal lag between rapidly changing requirements on AI model reusability and those specified in various AI model cards. Our objectives are to shorten the lag time in updating AI model card templates and align AI documentation more closely with current AI best practices. Our approach introduces a methodology for delivering agile, data-driven, and community-based AI model cards. We use the Hugging Face (HF) repository of AI models, populated by a subset of the AI research and development community, and the AI consortium-based Zero Draft (ZD) templates for the AI documentation of AI datasets and AI models, as our test datasets. We also address questions about the value of AI documentation for AI reusability. Our work quantifies the correlations between AI model downloads/likes (i.e., AI model reuse metrics) from the HF repository and their documentation alignment with the ZD documentation templates using tables of contents and word statistics (i.e., AI documentation quality metrics). Furthermore, our work develops the infrastructure to regularly compare AI documentation templates against community-standard practices derived from millions of uploaded AI models in the Hugging Face repository. The impact of our work lies in introducing a methodology for delivering agile, data-driven, and community-based standards for documenting AI models and improving AI model reuse.

Ordinary decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning presents each focal agent with a continual learning problem: peer updates change its induced rewards and dynamics even when the joint Markov game is stationary. We connect the lifetime of success-conditioned reusable structure to peer learning and policy reuse. An invariant core represents maximal abstract patterns shared by a high fraction of successful trajectories; survival refers to a fixed pattern's coverage, not an unchanged maximal frontier. An established sharp conditioning bound limits coverage loss to $\frac{\varepsilon}{p_0}$, where $\varepsilon$ is trajectory-law drift, $p_0$ is reference success mass, and drift is smaller than the initial compatible-success mass. Combining this bound with peer-policy movement certifies $Ω(\frac{1}η)$ survival under bounded peer updates of size $η$ and positive coverage margin. An effective-conflict condition yields a matching $Θ(\frac{1}η)$ first-exit law and holds in an analytic exact-policy-gradient class. With success-mass and performance calibration, structural survival also yields policy-value and finite-library transfer guarantees. An exactly solvable corridor tests the structural predictions. Two registered 64-stream studies in continual control and cue-MNIST show that coverage erosion predicts impending failure and enables near-oracle intervention. An exploratory reanalysis of eight learned-partner Level-Based Foraging pairings suggests the same erosion--failure link under peer learning.