Scientific ML

ML: Machine Learning

Overview

Scientific machine learning studies how to use machine learning for scientific prediction, simulation, and discovery while accounting for governing equations, physical constraints, and measurement processes. Common approaches include physics-informed neural networks, neural operators, hybrid models that augment classical solvers, and symbolic methods for learning equations; differentiable solvers and uncertainty estimates support inference and decision-making. Applications span problems such as fluid dynamics, climate, chemistry, materials, and astronomy, often where data are sparse or simulations are expensive. A central challenge is that physical structure can improve reliability when correctly specified but mislead when it does not fit the system, so predictive accuracy must be weighed against physical fidelity, generalization, uncertainty, and careful validation.

Latest papers

125 papers11 papers in the last four weeks, level with the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Dec 3, 2025

ATHENA: Agentic Team for Hierarchical Evolutionary Numerical Algorithms

Progress in computational science depends on complex numerical workflows that must faithfully encode physical laws, yet translating conceptual insight into reliable code remains a major bottleneck. Although large language models can generate isolated code fragments, they lack the structured reasoning required to design, verify, and iteratively refine complete scientific pipelines. Here we introduce ATHENA, an agentic framework explicitly designed to emulate scientific research modeled as a knowledge-driven contextual bandit process. Its core loop separates conceptual policy from numerical realization through expert-derived conceptual scaffolding, enabling principled diagnosis, reformulation, and repair of computational strategies. Across scientific computing and scientific machine learning tasks, ATHENA autonomously derives and correctly applies exact analytical solutions, constructs stable numerical solvers, diagnoses ill-posed formulations, and orchestrates hybrid symbolic-numeric workflows. Quantitatively, ATHENA matches and frequently surpasses the accuracy of expert-authored reference solutions reported in the literature on canonical benchmarks. By reframing computation as an object of agentic reasoning, our framework enables autonomous orchestration of heterogeneous algorithms across scientific domains.
Jul 5, 2025

Siamese Neural Network for Label-Efficient Critical Phenomena Prediction in 3D Percolation Models

Predicting critical phenomena from limited labeled data remains a challenging task in statistical physics. As percolation theory provides a canonical model for phase transitions with well-established critical exponents, it serves as an ideal benchmark for validating new machine learning frameworks. Here, we introduce a label-efficient learning framework based on a Siamese Neural Network (SNN) to identify phase transitions in three-dimensional site and bond percolation models. Using only 22 labeled probability points drawn entirely from non-critical regions, the method locates percolation thresholds with percent-level accuracy and yields estimates of the critical exponent νν consistent with literature values within statistical uncertainty. Analysis of the learned representations clarifies what the network learns: although trained solely on binary similarity labels, the network autonomously converges to a statistic that coincides quantitatively with the normalized largest-cluster size Smax/L3S_{max}/L^3 (r>0.99r > 0.99), the finite-size order parameter of percolation. This underlies the framework's most distinctive capability -- a model trained solely on simple cubic lattices identifies the phase transition in face-centered cubic lattices without retraining. The framework thus offers a complementary route to criticality detection in settings where no quantitative order parameter is explicitly defined or labeled data is scarce.
Jun 18, 2025

Interpretability and Generalization Bounds for Learning Spatial Physics

While there are many applications of ML to scientific problems that look promising, visuals can be deceiving. Using numerical analysis techniques, we rigorously quantify the accuracy, convergence rates, and generalization bounds of certain ML models applied to linear differential equations for parameter discovery or solution finding. Beyond the quantity and discretization of data, we identify that the function space of the data is critical to the generalization of the model. A similar lack of generalization is empirically demonstrated for commonly used models, including physics-specific techniques. Counterintuitively, we find that different classes of models can exhibit opposing generalization behaviors. Based on our theoretical analysis, we also introduce a new mechanistic interpretability lens on scientific models whereby Green's function representations can be extracted from the weights of black-box models. Our results inform a new cross-validation technique for measuring generalization in physical systems, which can serve as a benchmark.
Jun 2, 2025

Learning thermodynamic master equations for open quantum systems

The characterization of Hamiltonians and other components of open quantum dynamical systems plays a crucial role in quantum computing and other applications. Scientific machine learning techniques have been applied to this problem in a variety of ways, including by modeling with deep neural networks. However, the majority of mathematical models describing open quantum systems are linear, and the natural nonlinearities in learnable models have not been incorporated using physical principles. We present a data-driven model for open quantum systems that includes learnable, thermodynamically consistent terms. The trained model is interpretable, as it directly estimates the system Hamiltonian and linear components of coupling to the environment. We validate the model on synthetic two and three-level data, as well as experimental two-level data collected from a quantum device at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Aug 2, 2024

Autoencoders in Function Space

Autoencoders have found widespread application in both their original deterministic form and in their variational formulation (VAEs). In scientific applications and in image processing it is often of interest to consider data that are viewed as functions; while discretisation (of differential equations arising in the sciences) or pixellation (of images) renders problems finite dimensional in practice, conceiving first of algorithms that operate on functions, and only then discretising or pixellating, leads to better algorithms that smoothly operate between resolutions. In this paper function-space versions of the autoencoder (FAE) and variational autoencoder (FVAE) are introduced, analysed, and deployed. Well-definedness of the objective governing VAEs is a subtle issue, particularly in function space, limiting applicability. For the FVAE objective to be well defined requires compatibility of the data distribution with the chosen generative model; this can be achieved, for example, when the data arise from a stochastic differential equation, but is generally restrictive. The FAE objective, on the other hand, is well defined in many situations where FVAE fails to be. Pairing the FVAE and FAE objectives with neural operator architectures that can be evaluated on any mesh enables new applications of autoencoders to inpainting, superresolution, and generative modelling of scientific data.