Sparse Autoencoders

Also known as SAE

Overview

Sparse autoencoders learn a dictionary of features that can reconstruct a model’s dense activations using only a few active features at a time, helping researchers investigate superposition in language, vision, and multimodal models. Common approaches include L1- and Top-k-based training, BatchTopK, and structured variants that model feature groups, hierarchies, or relationships across layers and modalities. Researchers use the resulting features to explain model behavior and to steer, audit, or remove targeted behaviors, while testing them with reconstruction and interpretability benchmarks as well as causal interventions. A central open tension is that sparse, human-readable features are not necessarily stable across training runs or faithful causes of behavior, and better reconstruction does not by itself guarantee reliable explanations or control.

Latest papers

CardsList

220 papers42 papers in the last four weeks, up 133% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.

  1. Sparsity as a Key: Unlocking New Insights from Latent Structures for Out-of-Distribution Detection

    Apr 29, 2026Ahyoung Oh, Wonseok Shin, Songkuk KimSparse AutoencodersOOD Detection

  2. A Unifying Framework for Unsupervised Concept Extraction

    Apr 27, 2026Chandler Squires, Pradeep RavikumarUnsupervised LearningParameter Identifiability

  3. Domain-Filtered Knowledge Graphs from Sparse Autoencoder Features

    Apr 26, 2026John Winnicki, Abeynaya Gnanasekaran, Eric DarveKG ConstructionLLM Interpretability

  4. From Concept-Aligned Tokens to Vulnerable Features: Mechanistic Localization of Jailbreaks

    Apr 25, 2026Nilanjana Das, Mathew Dawit, Aman Chadha +1LLM InterpretabilitySparse Autoencoders

  5. From Tokens to Concepts: Leveraging SAE for SPLADE

    Apr 23, 2026Yuxuan Zong, Mathias Vast, Basile Van Cooten +2Learned Sparse RetrievalSparse Autoencoders

  6. Towards Understanding the Robustness of Sparse Autoencoders

    Apr 20, 2026Ahson Saiyed, Sabrina Sadiekh, Chirag AgarwalAdversarial Attacks on LLMsJailbreak Robustness

  7. Structural Instability of Feature Composition

    Apr 18, 2026Yunpeng ZhouFeature SuperpositionTransformer Interpretability

  8. Improving Sparse Autoencoder with Dynamic Attention

    Apr 16, 2026Dongsheng Wang, Jinsen Zhang, Dawei Su +1Sparse AutoencodersNeural Network Interpretability

  9. Sparse Autoencoder Decomposition of Clinical Sequence Model Representations: Feature Complexity, Task Specialisation, and Mortality Prediction

    Apr 13, 2026Chris Sainsbury, Feng Dong, Andreas KarwathEHR Foundation ModelsSparse Autoencoders

  10. Dictionary-Aligned Concept Control for Safeguarding Multimodal LLMs

    Apr 10, 2026Jinqi Luo, Jinyu Yang, Tal Neiman +5MLLM SafetyMultimodal Large Language Models

  11. Improving Robustness In Sparse Autoencoders via Masked Regularization

    Apr 7, 2026Vivek Narayanaswamy, Kowshik Thopalli, Bhavya Kailkhura +1Sparse AutoencodersMechanistic Interpretability

  12. Interpreting Video Representations with Spatio-Temporal Sparse Autoencoders

    Apr 5, 2026Atahan Dokme, Sriram VishwanathSparse AutoencodersVideo Representation Learning

  13. Stop Probing, Start Coding: Why Linear Probes and Sparse Autoencoders Fail at Compositional Generalisation

    Mar 30, 2026Vitória Barin-Pacela, Shruti Joshi, Isabela Camacho +2Sparse AutoencodersSparse Coding

  14. Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Medical Image Representation Learning

    Mar 24, 2026Philipp Wesp, Robbie Holland, Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa +1Medical Image RetrievalExplainable Medical Image Analysis

  15. DSPA: Dynamic SAE Steering for Data-Efficient Preference Alignment

    Mar 23, 2026James Wedgwood, Aashiq Muhamed, Mona T. Diab +1Preference AlignmentInference-Time Language Model Alignment

  16. Sparse Autoencoders Reveal Interpretable and Steerable Features in VLA Models

    Mar 19, 2026Aiden Swann, Lachlain McGranahan, Hugo Buurmeijer +2Vision-Language-Action ModelsInstruction Generalization in VLA Models

  17. Towards Interpretable Framework for Neural Audio Codecs via Sparse Autoencoders: A Case Study on Accent Information

    Mar 18, 2026Shih-Heng Wang, Tiantian Feng, Aditya Kommineni +4Neural Audio CodecsSparse Autoencoders

  18. Fundamental Limits of Neural Network Sparsification: Evidence from Catastrophic Interpretability Collapse

    Mar 18, 2026Dip Roy, Rajiv Misra, Sanjay Kumar SinghActivation SparsityNeural Network Interpretability

  19. Sparse Crosscoders for diffing MoEs and Dense models

    Mar 6, 2026Marmik Chaudhari, Nishkal Hundia, Idhant GulatiMixture-of-Experts InterpretabilityMixture-of-Experts Models

  20. Stable and Steerable Sparse Autoencoders with Weight Regularization

    Mar 4, 2026Piotr Jedryszek, Oliver M. CrookSparse AutoencodersLLM Interpretability

  21. Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process Interpretation

    Mar 3, 2026Xuan Yang, Jiayu Liu, Yuhang Lai +3LLM InterpretabilitySparse Autoencoders

  22. Learning Retrieval Models with Sparse Autoencoders

    Feb 27, 2026Thibault Formal, Maxime Louis, Hervé Dejean +1Learned Sparse RetrievalMultilingual IR

  23. SynthSAEBench: Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Scalable Realistic Synthetic Data

    Feb 16, 2026David Chanin, Adrià Garriga-AlonsoSparse AutoencodersSynthetic Benchmark Generation

  24. Sparse Autoencoders are Capable LLM Jailbreak Mitigators

    Feb 12, 2026Yannick Assogba, Jacopo Cortellazzi, Javier Abad +3Sparse AutoencodersLLM Jailbreak Attacks

  25. Variational Sparse Paired Autoencoders (vsPAIR) for Inverse Problems and Uncertainty Quantification

    Feb 3, 2026Jack Michael Solomon, Rishi Leburu, Matthias ChungVariational AutoencodersUncertainty Quantification